Hes not skilled enough or good enough to beat most of them. He also doesnt have the right style in most of these fights.
Who does he beat?
Pryor? No.
Leonard? No.
Duran? No
Hearns? No.
Arguello? No.
Tito? No.
Pep? No.
Sanchez? No.
Benitez? No.
Whitaker? Hell No.
Gomez? No.
Nelson? No.
Saddler? No.
Pacquaio? Hell no
I can go on and on. So stop whining as if its some kind of B-Scene conspiracy against him. Hes not skilled enough or good enough to beat these guys. So stopping hyping him as this great mythical warrior. FLoyd is not ATG, . But stop with the Top 20 stuff.
Im tried of all his fans complaining that he never gets favored over the ATG's. There is a reason for that dont ya think? It has nothing to do with "hating" him.
um..how can you prove who wins a fantasy match??and who really gives a shit??
Someone who finally gets it..
Green K bro...
Damn it says i must spread some green k around first...
Hes not skilled enough or good enough to beat most of them. He also doesnt have the right style in most of these fights.
Who does he beat?
Pryor? No.
Leonard? No.
Duran? No
Hearns? No.
Arguello? No.
Tito? No.
Pep? No.
Sanchez? No.
Benitez? No.
Whitaker? Hell No.
Gomez? No.
Nelson? No.
Saddler? No.
Pacquaio? Hell no
I can go on and on. So stop whining as if its some kind of B-Scene conspiracy against him. Hes not skilled enough or good enough to beat these guys. So stopping hyping him as this great mythical warrior. FLoyd is not ATG, . But stop with the Top 20 stuff.
Im tried of all his fans complaining that he never gets favored over the ATG's. There is a reason for that dont ya think? It has nothing to do with "hating" him.
I'm not even going to comment on all of the fighters here, but Mayweather would beat Arguello who wen't through hell with boxers. Vilomar Fernandez outboxed Arguello and he wasn't half the fighter Mayweather is. And Sanchez never fought above 126 so how do you have him beating Mayweather? And by the time Gomez fought at 130 he was pretty much finished. He got a gift decison against Rocky Lockridge, lost by TKO to Alfedo Layne. With you picking him to beat Mayweather shows you don't know what you're talking about. Mayweather had a very good chance of beating fighters like Nelson and Trinidad as well. You just threw names out there without a clue. I don't care how much you dislike a fighter. Either use common sense or look stupid.
you gutz, you need those bottles more than me i assure you----coz you suck---and you can't put up a decent argument---so you'd rather put in little pictures like a baby---
You are the one crying about a troll thread that i posted in responce to Burner thead.. yet you call me crying..
There is no point in arguing with dumb ass Flomos like you cause Floyd wins every fantasy fight even if he fighting Tyson or Ali.. Floyd will win..
And Pac loses every Fantasy fight even if he fighting Bugs Bunny...
have fun in your fantasy land where you take Floyd's dick up your ass daily..
you gutz, you need those bottles more than me i assure you----coz you suck---and you can't put up a decent argument---so you'd rather put in little pictures like a baby---
some of you guys really need to put the pipe down-----not only is floyd the most complete fighter on that list, he would dominate several of those dudes---do you guys actually watch the fights of these legends and floyd fights-----or is your hate for floyd so severe, you can't logically sit down and give decent arguments as to why he would lose to them, and i don't see him losing to any of them, let alone by ko----i could see srr beating him, and maybe hearns, but that's a huge maybe, floyd's movement is so complex, he would ave tommy slipping all over the place----tommy had a great jab, but bad movement----srl would lose to floyd because his most effective trait was his dynamic rhythm---which floyd would take away from him---people love to say srl would be too fast with his combos for floyd and too powerful for him and would be relentless on floyd--bullshit---srl was an excellent boxer with great footwork, not footmovement---not upperbody movement---floyd moves his body so well, just like a james toney style of movement, evading combinations and tiring out his opponents this way---don't let srl's fight with floyd sr. persuade you he would beat floyd jr.....bullshit----
and don't mention pep--i know how good pep slipped punches inside, but pep also got hit more than you think by fighters who timed his footwork---floyd is a brilliant virtuouso in the ring meaning, he may make it look boring, but when you go back and watch it in slow motion and rewind it and really analyze what he's doing, you'd know he's the closest to the perfect boxer in history----he is that scientific in the ring and he has a 6th sense---don't come with these retarted threads about floyd isn't good enough or skilled enough to beat these guys--coz that's utter bullshit-----
he could beat and most like would beat any of these guys you mentioned---they aren't invincible---they have losses for a reason----
and when he dominates the shit out manny and shane, i don't want to hear or read any excuses---he would mop the floor with duran and benitez--don't get it twisted---
the toughest guy for floyd on that list would be pryor, and not because pryor has the skills to match floyd, coz he's nowhere close to floyd's skillset--but pryor was so relentless with a chin of gold and never let up, but i don't see him beating floyd either----
only srr i see beating floyd out of anybody on that list---sadller? yeah right---you guys need to watch those guys fight in depth to analyze this shit---manny? i'm laughing at the threadstarter--he's a ****ing noob----tito? okay, yeah right, tito struggled with boxers didn't he---of course he had more power, floyd is a complete fighter---he dictates fighters----he dictates their movement, pace, controls their aggression, by tying them up, countering, avoiding punches and countering them only to reposition himself to capitalize on another mistake they make due to their frustration---you see it in every fight, they have to move after him and he knows how to strike like a snake and move out of the incoming-----
name any one of those fighters who could dodge punches like floyd did in the last .40 seconds of round 4 and round 6, by landing a counter right hand over jmm's jab and immediately dip a counter right hook after floyd's counter---that natural brilliance---floyd is the most complex fighter in history--bar none---the most balance boxer i've ever seen---and i've seen them all---this kid would be at the top in any era or close to it----he is that skilled---so **** you threadstarter---
Here you go...
:bottle::bottle::bottle:
some of you guys really need to put the pipe down-----not only is floyd the most complete fighter on that list, he would dominate several of those dudes---do you guys actually watch the fights of these legends and floyd fights-----or is your hate for floyd so severe, you can't logically sit down and give decent arguments as to why he would lose to them, and i don't see him losing to any of them, let alone by ko----i could see srr beating him, and maybe hearns, but that's a huge maybe, floyd's movement is so complex, he would ave tommy slipping all over the place----tommy had a great jab, but bad movement----srl would lose to floyd because his most effective trait was his dynamic rhythm---which floyd would take away from him---people love to say srl would be too fast with his combos for floyd and too powerful for him and would be relentless on floyd--bullshit---srl was an excellent boxer with great footwork, not footmovement---not upperbody movement---floyd moves his body so well, just like a james toney style of movement, evading combinations and tiring out his opponents this way---don't let srl's fight with floyd sr. persuade you he would beat floyd jr.....bullshit----
and don't mention pep--i know how good pep slipped punches inside, but pep also got hit more than you think by fighters who timed his footwork---floyd is a brilliant virtuouso in the ring meaning, he may make it look boring, but when you go back and watch it in slow motion and rewind it and really analyze what he's doing, you'd know he's the closest to the perfect boxer in history----he is that scientific in the ring and he has a 6th sense---don't come with these retarted threads about floyd isn't good enough or skilled enough to beat these guys--coz that's utter bullshit-----
he could beat and most like would beat any of these guys you mentioned---they aren't invincible---they have losses for a reason----
and when he dominates the shit out manny and shane, i don't want to hear or read any excuses---he would mop the floor with duran and benitez--don't get it twisted---
the toughest guy for floyd on that list would be pryor, and not because pryor has the skills to match floyd, coz he's nowhere close to floyd's skillset--but pryor was so relentless with a chin of gold and never let up, but i don't see him beating floyd either----
only srr i see beating floyd out of anybody on that list---sadller? yeah right---you guys need to watch those guys fight in depth to analyze this shit---manny? i'm laughing at the threadstarter--he's a ****ing noob----tito? okay, yeah right, tito struggled with boxers didn't he---of course he had more power, floyd is a complete fighter---he dictates fighters----he dictates their movement, pace, controls their aggression, by tying them up, countering, avoiding punches and countering them only to reposition himself to capitalize on another mistake they make due to their frustration---you see it in every fight, they have to move after him and he knows how to strike like a snake and move out of the incoming-----
name any one of those fighters who could dodge punches like floyd did in the last .40 seconds of round 4 and round 6, by landing a counter right hand over jmm's jab and immediately dip a counter right hook after floyd's counter---that natural brilliance---floyd is the most complex fighter in history--bar none---the most balance boxer i've ever seen---and i've seen them all---this kid would be at the top in any era or close to it----he is that skilled---so **** you threadstarter---
LOL..
I just started this.. cause Burner has me on ignore again..
it gives me an image of an altar boy covering his ears and singing a happy song whenever the priest decides to give him his version of an immaculate conception...
People bitching about fantasy matchups now? Who cares? I'm expecting this Pac-Floyd shit to spill to the streets soon. If any of these people lived close to each other it probably would. :nonono:
lol yeah why not that's more exciting than keyboard wars:boxing:
He doesnt get destroyed by Hearns. Hearns even said that.
That's just Tommy being nice (due to him being a fellow Detroit fighter). Truth is Floyd gets KTFO by Tommy at 147. That left jab alone would kill Floyd and there is no way in Hell Floyd would be able to shoulder roll Tommy's over hand right.
ur a fking idiot...
it dont matter what time of the day i might come on and check out this website, ur forever on here sucking floyd's nuts.......chill
i checked that list and even though pep is regarded as having the best defense (in his time), i'd still favor floyd's skills over him....pep would have trouble boxing floyd imo...
to be honest, floyd's defense is ATG status no doubt....but
i just dont think he'd win with these natural born fighters u mentioned...maybe a decision with a couple but idk cuz dude posted up a lot of great fighters...i just had to get something of my ass from this ceilings character lol
alright, i peeped the entire list and imo, i'd give floyd a good chance against saddler....maybe tito....MAYBE lol
REALLY GOOD POST BTW!!! I'VE ALWAYS THOUGHT ABOUT THIS MYSELF AND DEF WANTED TO COMMENT ON IT...GOOD ISH
Hed lose to Leonard, Robinson, and maybe Hearns. He beats everyone else though.
Especially Pryor. Pryor gets the worse beating out the bunch.
ur a fking idiot...
it dont matter what time of the day i might come on and check out this website, ur forever on here sucking floyd's nuts.......chill
i checked that list and even though pep is regarded as having the best defense (in his time), i'd still favor floyd's skills over him....pep would have trouble boxing floyd imo...
to be honest, floyd's defense is ATG status no doubt....but
i just dont think he'd win with these natural born fighters u mentioned...maybe a decision with a couple but idk cuz dude posted up a lot of great fighters...i just had to get something of my ass from this ceilings character lol
People bitching about fantasy matchups now? Who cares? I'm expecting this Pac-Floyd shit to spill to the streets soon. If any of these people lived close to each other it probably would. :nonono:
i just bring it up because u said a tito fight would be a toss up. but oscar was beating tito pretty impressively and 1sidedly until he went into full retreat. but you think floyd stands just as good if not better chances against prime delahoya?
Tito was having trouble making 147 by the time he fought Oscar. He wanted to move up to 154 two years earlier. He actually did move up and was going to fight Terry Norris at 154. He fought Troy Walters as a tune up at 154. But, then at the end of that year Norris got upset by Keith Mullings. So there was not other money fight at 154 for Tito so he went back down to 147 to fight the money fights against the likes of Quartey, Whitaker, and Oscar. By the time he fought Oscar he was a drained fighter. That is why he wanted to give Oscar a rematch at a catchweight of 150 right after. But, Oscar wanted it at 147. And, Tito didn't like that weight anymore.
A prime Tito also, if you look at the 93-97 version was a good boxer, with good skills. He had a very good jab, and he use head movement and had some lateral movement. He did get dropped early in fights when he was caught cold. But, he also could slip and avoid punches. He also went to the body and was a dynamic puncher from both hands. The problem with Tito later in his career is that he felt in love with his power. So people remember him a KO aritist come forward fighter. But, people forget that 93-97 version had pretty damn good skills and was healthy not drained at all.
What do you guys think about this?
Specifically, the first 2:10 of the video.
This isn't an attempt to bash Floyd or anything by me, just found this interesting.
Floyd has a chance to pick up some wins against them. Pacquiao too.
I will say that I like Floyd's chances in more though. While Pacquiao often wins in a more spectacular fashion due to his style, I think Mayweather is just plain harder to beat due to his.
I agree with this........