LOL, I'm surprised you even put "Tyson Decision" choice in the poll. Prime Tyson with Rooney shouting numbers and Tyson throwing the corresponding combinations would have ate that Klit.
The question is: who had more power?: 37 year old Lennox or prime Tyson?
Lennox damn near ko'd Vitali with an uppercut in 2003, so if Tyson could generate that same power I think he wins in 3 rounds. Too quick.
You're dreaming with your "uppercut" story. As a matter of fact there were about 6 successive uppercuts, whilst the fighters were walking to the ropes. There isn't a scintilla of evidence that any of the uppercuts actually hit Klitschko instead of his glove or other body part.
They certainly didn't bother him in the slightest, and ANY unbiased, commonsense viewer, would agree. If they had bothered him, he'd have made sure it was stopped, the simple and best answer.
lol.cause there was no1 who had a legit shot at beating him then...the division was shit
When I say "ANYONE," I mean any heavyweight at any point in the history of boxing.
And I stand by that.
Ask yourself this: In Tyson's prime, what amount of your own money would you be willing to bet against him?
I wouldn't bet against Tyson against ANYONE in his prime.
The question is: who had more power?: 37 year old Lennox or prime Tyson?
Lennox damn near ko'd Vitali with an uppercut in 2003, so if Tyson could generate that same power I think he wins in 3 rounds. Too quick.
Nearly KOed? What fight were you watching. Vitali was about to KFO Lewis in the next round, when the fight was stopped on cuts.
Vitali would win a match with Tyson. Vitali was a 5 world champion in kickboxing and has had an amazing career in boxing, and he was never even knocked down.
The question is: who had more power?: 37 year old Lennox or prime Tyson?
Lennox damn near ko'd Vitali with an uppercut in 2003, so if Tyson could generate that same power I think he wins in 3 rounds. Too quick.