Oscar de la Hoya Wants Pacquiao Lawsuit Dropped

what you said is absolutely perfect. if the mayweather camp was smart and said that we'd be looking at a pac-mayweather fight...and if pac still denied it then even the pacquiao fans would be suspicious. They are dumb and suspicious. You see, Shane vs Floyd fight by not doing the OST the rest of their undercards makes you wonder why? Maybe the absolutely know that their undercards are not on steroids like they know about Pac? Double standard ha?:no:

Anybody find it funny that the Golden Boy website has still has Pacman listed as one of it's fighters, but yet it won't book a match with Pacquiao against "one of it's fighters" unless he does an OST drug test? Hell yeah, I can see them losing their minority interests in Pacquiao. http://www.goldenboypromotions.com/fighters/mpacquiao.php And now Floyd vs Shane fight, the GBP doing the OST but not a single one in their undercards? What the hell it is? Are they really serious about of cleaning the sport or this is just for show to save Floyd face by single out Pac and the questionable motive of why he did not ask his 40 previous opponents if he really wants to clean the sport? We know the Mosley OST is just to save his face.:wtf1:

I could sue my work if they required me to take random hair samples, me and just me and no one else, even though I already passed my urine test. I find that invasive. It's just a little hair, right? They want to know if you're clean right? I would win in court. uhmmm??? no you wouldnt....

They're idiots for even saying his name. They could have hinted around it without saying his name as well as thrown in the need for Olympic style drug testing in the sport. Example: "The fans have questioned the sports integrity with our current testing. There are some whispers going around that some of our athletes may be using PEDs. To prove them wrong, it would be great to start with the biggest fight of the year...Floyd vs. Pac...to set the example by introducing a new and improved testing system that will be the most advanced testing system in place in all of sports to help ease the concerns of our beloved fans who wish to see "clean" athletes competing. We are far behind and we will show the world we will now lead. I'm sure both athletes will be happy to step up to the plate and face any testing that is thrown at them because they are clean athletes and have nothing to hide. No one will take a step back because that will make it seem like they are hiding something but I know boxers have nothing to hide so come on and bring it" what you said is absolutely perfect. if the mayweather camp was smart and said that we'd be looking at a pac-mayweather fight...and if pac still denied it then even the pacquiao fans would be suspicious.

I feel you, man. But if this was a work situation, and the other guy (ie. Mosley) was given a pass on drug testing (which he was willing to take, to his credit) but the company went to bat for him and said he didn't have to be treated like a cheater, but for you, YOU have to take the test, how would you feel? Is that on you? Why was it different for Mosley. No one, and I mean NO ONE, should have to submit to drug tests they are not required to take. http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=24322 Mosely's taking the test.

Ten times? Manny Pacquiao dropped out of school in the 3rd grade. Your average Boxing Scene user is 1000x smarter than Manny Pacquiao, let alone Oscar De la Hoya. Just because he has no education does not make him dumb. Richard Branson was a drop-out, the idiot.

but this is not a work requirement...it's an independently drawn contract managed by a promotion company...completely different... and GBP may request if they fell it put their other fighters in the line of danger...it was always at pac's discretion to take the test...he didn't want to agree to the contract...that's on him... if your job comes to you and tells you they have a new position that requires a physical...and you've never taken a physical for any of your other positions...it's on you to accept the terms...if you don't...that's on you...it's going to be on pac to prove that he has suffered financially due to the scrutiny that he's claiming GBP is backing on account of mayweather...but if GBP is looking out for the best interest of both fighters...what if floyd and manny faught...floyd get's hurt...then it comes out that manny was on something...floyd could have the right to sue...so in the best interest of both fighters, GBP would be a fool to deny conveying floyd's request...especially after he's made it public... I feel you, man. But if this was a work situation, and the other guy (ie. Mosley) was given a pass on drug testing (which he was willing to take, to his credit) but the company went to bat for him and said he didn't have to be treated like a cheater, but for you, YOU have to take the test, how would you feel? Is that on you? Why was it different for Mosley. No one, and I mean NO ONE, should have to submit to drug tests they are not required to take. http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=24322

Wrong. Your employee handbook would have random tests specifically outlined, and that would have to be clearly addressed to all new employees during orientation or it's a clusterfock nightmare for HR if they did change the rules on you. No one, and I mean NO ONE, is under any obligation to take a drug test they are not required to take. Up until the rules are changed, you cannot arbritraily single out one person here or there. but this is not a work requirement...it's an independently drawn contract managed by a promotion company...completely different... and GBP may request if they fell it put their other fighters in the line of danger...it was always at pac's discretion to take the test...he didn't want to agree to the contract...that's on him... if your job comes to you and tells you they have a new position that requires a physical...and you've never taken a physical for any of your other positions...it's on you to accept the terms...if you don't...that's on you...it's going to be on pac to prove that he has suffered financially due to the scrutiny that he's claiming GBP is backing on account of mayweather...but if GBP is looking out for the best interest of both fighters...what if floyd and manny faught...floyd get's hurt...then it comes out that manny was on something...floyd could have the right to sue...so in the best interest of both fighters, GBP would be a fool to deny conveying floyd's request...especially after he's made it public...

Go pac don't drop the lawsuit. Sue all this cheaters who are so jealous to your success.

No this is not elementary school, this is real life and boxing at highest level where millions of dollars are potentially at stake. Manny Pacquiao's own (minority) promotor who willingly makes a profit off him, has gone on record that they won't entertain matching Pac against other fighters in their own stable unless he submits to drug testing that he is under NO obligatation to take. What kind of promotor canibalizes it's own fighter, and does not serve his best interest? Don't know about advertising. But if Pacquiao attempts to deal with JMM for a third fight, and Golden Boy sticks with that hard line stance that he must submit to blood testing that is not recognized by any of the boxing commissions, then he can potentially lose the purse of that fight that would have been made if they signed a regular boxing contract under current rules. They made 2 fights before with no OST, why now? Estimates can be drawn for a hard dollar figure that can be used in court, and could be argued with some validity based on past PPVs. Goldenboy specifically targeting one of it's own fighters can be construed as defaming one of it's own. How far it goes, I don't know, but don't tell me this is nothing. Pacquiao can easily come up with dollar amounts for fights that can be made if GBP refuses to negotiate on his behalf...a fighter, mind you, that supoposedly is part of their stable. I understand what your saying but I don't recall any GBP representative specifically saying Pacquiao does steroids. Just because they say it's odd that he wouldn't take a blood test or how is he afraid of needles but has tattoos all over, doesn't mean they are throwing him under the bus. It's their opinion and reasonable questioning. It's not like they froze him out or forced him into taking drug tests that aren't in the norm. So where does Pacquiao come off sueing GBP? He has no grounds to sue them. The only person(s) who specifically stated that Pacquiao is on PEDs is Roger and Sr. Who both of which accused Pacquiao of being on a made up, mythical, non-existant drug. Floyd indirectly accused him of steroids but never specifically said Pacquiao's name nor specifically stated any drug. So again, in my opinion, Pacquiao lawsuit falls way short of being taken seriously in court. I think it will be thrown out, if Pacquiao doesn't drop the charges before it goes to court.

you don't know that...if they had any reason to ask for it...and you, say lied about not giving a reason...then they might have probable cause to do further testing...especially if these further tests can catch something the original tests can't catch... and if the commission implements these new tests after the fact...your case really would lose legs...and you also know that if this case is won on pac's part (which i highly doubt) he wouldn't get close to that amount of money... and how is he going to prove that any of this has impacted his character? Wrong. Your employee handbook would have random tests specifically outlined, and that would have to be clearly addressed to all new employees during orientation or it's a clusterfock nightmare for HR if they did change the rules on you. No one, and I mean NO ONE, is under any obligation to take a drug test they are not required to take. Up until the rules are changed, you cannot arbritraily single out one person here or there.

after the lawsuit, dlh won't be getting his check no more DLH will still be making money off Pac without doing anything. :spank:

I could sue my work if they required me to take random hair samples, me and just me and no one else, even though I already passed my urine test. I find that invasive. It's just a little hair, right? They want to know if you're clean right? I would win in court. you don't know that...if they had any reason to ask for it...and you, say lied about not giving a reason...then they might have probable cause to do further testing...especially if these further tests can catch something the original tests can't catch... and if the commission implements these new tests after the fact...your case really would lose legs...and you also know that if this case is won on pac's part (which i highly doubt) he wouldn't get close to that amount of money... and how is he going to prove that any of this has impacted his character?

You've got it twisted bra. Anyhow, this lawsuit is pointless. It'll get nowhere in court. Then why is Oscar afraid? :rofl:

I don't approve of the lawsuit either. But fuck Oscar De La Hoya. He is Pac's bitch. You've got it twisted bra. Anyhow, this lawsuit is pointless. It'll get nowhere in court.

hoe shit...you are going to sue someone because they want to know if you're clean? I could sue my work if they required me to take random hair samples, me and just me and no one else, even though I already passed my urine test. I find that invasive. It's just a little hair, right? They want to know if you're clean right? I would win in court.

Floyd Snr and Roger Snr slandered Pacquiaos name, and they are big names in the boxing world. I hope that they get sued so much that they won't have anymore money to buy their drugs. They don't need anymore drugs anyways, their faces are ugly looking probably from all that crack they smoked.

hoe shit...you are going to sue someone because they want to know if you're clean?

I don't approve of the lawsuit either. But fuck Oscar De La Hoya. He is Pac's bitch. That's why Pac has to pay DLH millions every time he fights. :rofl:

Are you serious? This isn't elementary school, where you go tell the teacher because the kid in the class called you a poop face. Pacquiao's law suit is worthless, it will get thrown out. He doesn't have a solid foundation to stand on. All he has is Floyd sr. and Roger talking about a non-existant drug. So how is Pacquiao's law suit going to work? He said she said? No. That holds no weight in court. And if those faxes are true, where Pacquiao's camp asked to keep dirty tests secret. If those are true and get braught into the court as defense. Pacquiao fucked himself hard. "opinions and reasonable questions." No this is not elementary school, this is real life and boxing at highest level where millions of dollars are potentially at stake. Manny Pacquiao's own (minority) promotor who willingly makes a profit off him, has gone on record that they won't entertain matching Pac against other fighters in their own stable unless he submits to drug testing that he is under NO obligatation to take. What kind of promotor canibalizes it's own fighter, and does not serve his best interest? Don't know about advertising. But if Pacquiao attempts to deal with JMM for a third fight, and Golden Boy sticks with that hard line stance that he must submit to blood testing that is not recognized by any of the boxing commissions, then he can potentially lose the purse of that fight that would have been made if they signed a regular boxing contract under current rules. They made 2 fights before with no OST, why now? Estimates can be drawn for a hard dollar figure that can be used in court, and could be argued with some validity based on past PPVs. Goldenboy specifically targeting one of it's own fighters can be construed as defaming one of it's own. How far it goes, I don't know, but don't tell me this is nothing. Pacquiao can easily come up with dollar amounts for fights that can be made if GBP refuses to negotiate on his behalf...a fighter, mind you, that supoposedly is part of their stable.