i think nazim richardson

Roach is better based on the fact that he took a Pacquiao that was technically flawed and helped turn him into what he is today.

I like them both but if I had to put my bottom dollar on one I would have to lean toward Richardson. He doesn’t crave the spotlight; he’s not in to the whole trash talking bid, and exhibits an old school approach to his fighters.

I'd definately prefer Roach.

He's not that good, Freddy roach is better.

To me.. Roach becomes like your Father.. Nazim becomes like you Best Friend.. I'd rather have Roach..he has no family and is devoted to his fighters..(mainly Pac of course)...and he'll study everything he needs to study and make you the opponents Kryptonite...literally..if you got the tools and Freddy takes you under his wings..you're in for a great Career..like Pac, Khan, and hopefully Benavidez jr

kinda OT, but whatever happened to naazim's son, rock allen?? he wasnt that impressive last time i saw him, but he was a decorated amateur and was undefeated as a pro. he just disappeared.

Nazim Richardson operates how all trainers should operate...quietly in the background. He lets his hard work speak though his fighters, and not through his mouth.

I think he is a real good and careful trainer, but I also feel you need to be top to work with him and implement his plans. With Roach, he has a good gym for learner etc...