Pacquiao should not fight Valero.

In the mean time what will Pacquiao do? He isn't a Flopyd/Hopkins type fighter who can sit on the shelf, and rely on their defense, he has to stay busy. honestly, I would hope that he would fight for a title at 154 next. In the mean time Arum can build up Margarito or Valero and then Pac could fight them next. here is the scenario I see playing out: Pac fights Foreman/Cotto winner in October. Valero faces Peterson in the summer, then goes on to face Bradley in October on the undercard. If both win, Valero would have proven himself at 140 and Pac could fight him in Jan or so. while this is happening Toney beats Jones in May Fight Collazo in the summer Fall fights Berto/quintana winner and hopefully he would be ready for Pac in by cinco de mayo next year.

i honestly thing it would be good to see Pac fighting some new blood, up and coming fighters. Valero has a big mouth and i'd love to see Pac beat the living shit out of him. I dont see it wrong as a stay busy fight, of course i'd love Floyd-Mosley winner but Floyd dont wanna get in that ring after watching how Manny is doing now... I don't even believe Floyd vs Pac is going to happen so I'm done with that. But Valero vs Pac, not right now, NO. There are good opponents out there outside of Top Rank....Valero and Margarito have been mentioned. They're bluffing with Alexander or Bradley.

I don't want to see Pacquaio fighting ANYONE from Top Rank. That shit is getting old. i honestly thing it would be good to see Pac fighting some new blood, up and coming fighters. Valero has a big mouth and i'd love to see Pac beat the living shit out of him. I dont see it wrong as a stay busy fight, of course i'd love Floyd-Mosley winner but Floyd dont wanna get in that ring after watching how Manny is doing now...

I don't want to see Pacquaio fighting ANYONE from Top Rank. That shit is getting old.

It sounds like Roach has drunk Arum's kool-aid saying Valero is the best money opponent. What is he thinking? Valero is still a relative unknown to the general public. This is what I am saying. Man, I'd been wanting Pacquiao vs. Valero ever since Pac vs. Morales III. But now that Pacquiao's popularity has risen to another level, Valero gots to build up his, even just 2-3 Showtime/HBO fights in the U.S.. In a perfect world here is how I see it. June 2010 - Valero vs. some bum at 140 Winner: Valero by KO October 2010 Pacquiao vs. Mosley/Mayweather winner Winner: Pac October 2010 - Valero vs. Bradley (may be undercard of Pacquiao Mosley/Mayweather winner) Winner: Valero by TKO February 2011 - Valero vs. Amir Khan Winner: Valero by KO THE SHOWDOWN Summer 2011 - Pacquiao vs. Valero Winner: I don't give a **** as long as its a show!!! ala Hagler Hearns style

oh, It would end in hardcore Floyd fans spiddin in hardcore pac fans' faces callin it out: Pac,a real WW, fought a LW, former feahterweight, In Valero. I have no problem with this fight when both fighters are willing to fight eachother and Valero of course want to... now its up to Pac.

It sounds like Roach has drunk Arum's kool-aid saying Valero is the best money opponent. What is he thinking? Valero is still a relative unknown to the general public. marg-pa would be a good fight, but for action pac-valero is great, dont know how mnay rounds it ould last though, not many at all

It sounds like Roach has drunk Arum's kool-aid saying Valero is the best money opponent. What is he thinking? Valero is still a relative unknown to the general public.

he has to prove himself first at 140. very true, valero is a good boxer with great power, lets see how he progresses

he has to prove himself first at 140. In the mean time what will Pacquiao do? He isn't a Flopyd/Hopkins type fighter who can sit on the shelf, and rely on their defense, he has to stay busy.