Clottey's trainer already said Clottey admitted to only fighting to show Roach that Pacquiao can't knock him out. The fight altogether was not fixed, but in Clottey's case he had already fixed himself to go 12 rounds and lose.
They openly said that?
Clottey's trainer already said Clottey admitted to only fighting to show Roach that Pacquiao can't knock him out. The fight altogether was not fixed, but in Clottey's case he had already fixed himself to go 12 rounds and lose.
clottey fought the same type of fight he always does. people questioning how legit the fight is have clearly never watched clottey therefore their opinions aint worth shit!
and you're not any better than those who're saying that by starting up a thread about it and stirring the pot. you're making it an actual discussion. come on now.
I didn't know that shit was an option. Until I just read that in Reed podcast is one of the main topics. So I am just asking where did this shit come from?
the only fight that seemed fishy was the Castillo fight...kinda like 'i gave 5 rounds...should be good enough' :nonono:
That fight was horrible. At least it ended quick...
I won't say that its fixed but this is the second time in a Manny Pacquiao fight that I've seen his opponents, who do their BEST WORK WHEN THEIR OPPONENTS BACK WAS ON THE ROPES LIKE MANNY'S WERE IN THE COTTO FIGHT AND NOW THE CLOTTEY FIGHT and both Clottey and Cotto didn't little or no work. Why is that? There is a common denominator in play also. Both guys are Top Rank fighters.