Personally i think Tyson was better, ive never seen a heavyweight with so much lateral movement, side to side up and down bob n weave....whilst throwing punches, the prime we know of, was only when he was 20 years old....imagine what he would of been at 28-30, he would of been either the greatest or by far one of the greatest boxers that ever lived
Thats my opinion anyway.... of course styles make fights, some1 like ali might well beat him, but how many alis have there ever been? lol
Tysons training was far too intense for him to stay healthy or fit into a prime at 30
Liaton was good, but far too slow for Tyson. He'd have a tough time even finding him.
Tyson all the way.
Yea to slow easy to read and to basic people who gave Mike trouble were advanced in young the jab and had speed with it
Easy one this, Tyson much faster, hits just as hard if not harder, much better overall boxing skill.
Liston's advantage would be his jab but Tyson would swarm all around it, likely stopping him late.
Wrong would be early son was way to slow and easy to read why would it be late son wasn't that tough and and why would that be a advantage having a slow easy to read jab
mike beats him in 2
Easy one this, Tyson much faster, hits just as hard if not harder, much better overall boxing skill.
Liston's advantage would be his jab but Tyson would swarm all around it, likely stopping him late.
I think Liston is historically underrated. There is a chance he could get blitzed early by Tyson, Mike was so dangerous in those first few rounds, his speed was difficult to adjust to early, but my pick is Liston by late stoppage. Once the pace slowed Liston would take over
Liaton was good, but far too slow for Tyson. He'd have a tough time even finding him.
Tyson all the way.
very true.....Frazier's pressure style is not the same as Tyson's peek-a-boo style...people often confuse the two......Angelo Dundee said Ali would "Slap Tyson Around if they fought"
Well Angelo Dundee would...wouldn't he. Which only means that he was Ali's trainer and corner guy. Tyson would beat any heavyweight in History at his best.
Cool bro. Have a good one.
Well your a dumbboy cause floyd was a basic mike and didn't fight the exact same dummy and way smaller and joe was nothing like Joe fought nothing like him you dumb follower so comparing him and floyd makes no sense so why use it
both son and george was both slow and easy to read how is that wrong for mike you idiot stop see how repeating dumb quotes other dummies use makes you look like a idiot
The person who beat george who fought somewhat like mike beat george left him out you crazy dummies always do
The person who fought like son named sam lost to mike see how not watching matches exposes you
Mike was wrong for them he destroyed those types he beat a pusher like george named Trevor
He beat Smith a better tech slugger then george and had more speed and was close range which would be harder for mike to avoid shots using logic but he had trouble
Why would george beat mike when he was slower then both Trevor and razor and had no defense
Why would son who was easier to read then george land on mike when he was also slower then both Trevor and razor
u followers need to stop repeating these dumb old quotes that's been exposed years ago we have vid idiot
Watch matches instead of exposing yourself dummy.
Doesnt matter what your messed up mind thinks from dumb quotes other crazy dummies think on vid mike showed he destroyed those like son and george like I said
Well your a dumbboy cause floyd was a basic mike and didn't fight the exact same dummy and way smaller and joe was nothing like Joe fought nothing like him you dumb follower so comparing him and floyd makes no sense so why use it
both son and george was both slow and easy to read how is that wrong for mike you idiot stop see how repeating dumb quotes other dummies use makes you look like a idiot
The person who beat george who fought somewhat like mike beat george left him out you crazy dummies always do
The person who fought like son named sam lost to mike see how not watching matches exposes you
Mike was wrong for them he destroyed those types he beat a pusher like george named Trevor
He beat Smith a better tech slugger then george and had more speed and was close range which would be harder for mike to avoid shots using logic but he had trouble
Why would george beat mike when he was slower then both Trevor and razor and had no defense
Why would son who was easier to read then george land on mike when he was also slower then both Trevor and razor
u followers need to stop repeating these dumb old quotes that's been exposed years ago we have vid idiot
Watch matches instead of exposing yourself dummy.
Doesnt matter what your messed up mind thinks from dumb quotes other crazy dummies think on vid mike showed he destroyed those like son and george like I said
Smith? Berbick? And I'm the dummy?
LOOOOOL
I'm an Official Tyson Fanboy but I honestly believe that Liston and Foreman were all wrong for him, based on Patterson vs Liston and Frazier vs Foreman.
I also suspect Witherspoon would've caused him some problems.
Well your a dumbboy cause floyd was a basic mike and didn't fight the exact same dummy and way smaller and joe was nothing like Joe fought nothing like him you dumb follower so comparing him and floyd makes no sense so why use it
both son and george was both slow and easy to read how is that wrong for mike you idiot stop see how repeating dumb quotes other dummies use makes you look like a idiot
The person who beat george who fought somewhat like mike beat george left him out you crazy dummies always do
The person who fought like son named sam lost to mike see how not watching matches exposes you
Mike was wrong for them he destroyed those types he beat a pusher like george named Trevor
He beat Smith a better tech slugger then george and had more speed and was close range which would be harder for mike to avoid shots using logic but he had trouble
Why would george beat mike when he was slower then both Trevor and razor and had no defense
Why would son who was easier to read then george land on mike when he was also slower then both Trevor and razor
u followers need to stop repeating these dumb old quotes that's been exposed years ago we have vid idiot
Watch matches instead of exposing yourself dummy.
Doesnt matter what your messed up mind thinks from dumb quotes other crazy dummies think on vid mike showed he destroyed those like son and george like I said
I'm an Official Tyson Fanboy but I honestly believe that Liston and Foreman were all wrong for him, based on Patterson vs Liston and Frazier vs Foreman.
I also suspect Witherspoon would've caused him some problems.
The fight is about, how long can Liston withstand Mike Tyson's power? Because Tyson is hitting Liston.
Sonny Liston had great jab, and he hit extremely hard. In order for him to win, he will have to survive the opening biltz.
But with a 80's or even early 90's Mike Tyson, he opening biltz did not really end after the opening rounds 'Check the Razor Ruddock fights'.
I think Mike Tyson would win, it would be competitive while it lasted.
Good fight.
Not competitive at all mike was way to fast and great at countering son was slow and easy to read why would that be tough for mike
I think Liston is historically underrated. There is a chance he could get blitzed early by Tyson, Mike was so dangerous in those first few rounds, his speed was difficult to adjust to early, but my pick is Liston by late stoppage. Once the pace slowed Liston would take over
Your pick is a man who was slow and easy to read which never gave Mike trouble your odd mike destroys him watch matches cause that pick makes no sense its fact Mike would win
I think Liston is historically underrated. There is a chance he could get blitzed early by Tyson, Mike was so dangerous in those first few rounds, his speed was difficult to adjust to early, but my pick is Liston by late stoppage. Once the pace slowed Liston would take over
The fight is about, how long can Liston withstand Mike Tyson's power? Because Tyson is hitting Liston.
Sonny Liston had great jab, and he hit extremely hard. In order for him to win, he will have to survive the opening biltz.
But with a 80's or even early 90's Mike Tyson, he opening biltz did not really end after the opening rounds 'Check the Razor Ruddock fights'.
I think Mike Tyson would win, it would be competitive while it lasted.
Good fight.
Well I meant as far as style, people assume that since Frazier gave Ali so much trouble Tyson would because of physical similarities, but Tyson's style is not that similar to Frazier's.
I dont think tyson has the stamina to give ali trouble....where as frazier would fight till the end of the 15th round
Personally i think Tyson was better, ive never seen a heavyweight with so much lateral movement, side to side up and down bob n weave....whilst throwing punches, the prime we know of, was only when he was 20 years old....imagine what he would of been at 28-30, he would of been either the greatest or by far one of the greatest boxers that ever lived
Thats my opinion anyway.... of course styles make fights, some1 like ali might well beat him, but how many alis have there ever been? lol
Well I meant as far as style, people assume that since Frazier gave Ali so much trouble Tyson would because of physical similarities, but Tyson's style is not that similar to Frazier's.