Alright, so I just wanted to ask an honest question with an honest answer possible for all that thinks Pac is roiding. Okay, so lets say Pacquiao gives in and agrees to the 14 day window, passes and wins by a devastating knock out. Would that some how still raise questions for you guys?
silence speak for itself. damn, that's ashame.
nah man, this is just a stupid thread.
pacquiao has to FIRST accept the 14-day window stipulation......THEN, he has to come to ring and KO mayweather, something that has never been done before....:no:
first things first man, and this "hypothetical" situation you just posed is as unlikely to happen as me winning the lottery.
if pacquiao was gonna agree to the 14 day window, he would've done so when it was posed....
If Good 'ol Paulie still says that PAC is roiding, then thats what the Flomos will stand for.
Paulie has a Ph.D on GRANDIOSE SPECULATION. Flomos have a Ph.D in StarTrekkie Science :439:
Alright, so I just wanted to ask an honest question with an honest answer possible for all that thinks Pac is roiding. Okay, so lets say Pacquiao gives in and agrees to the 14 day window, passes and wins by a devastating knock out. Would that some how still raise questions for you guys?
Absolutely not. Anyone that would still accuse Pacquiao of roiding after that is just hating on the guy.
Alright, so I just wanted to ask an honest question with an honest answer possible for all that thinks Pac is roiding. Okay, so lets say Pacquiao gives in and agrees to the 14 day window, passes and wins by a devastating knock out. Would that some how still raise questions for you guys?
There is your answer, no amount of convincing will change their minds.
There are some who might probably give him the benefit of the doubt, but will go back to their old ways after a month or so, when the euphoria dies out.
I've seen a similar phenomenon when he fought Cotto, Hatton, DLH.
Respect was initially given, until someone finds a way to diss it, then trolls proceed to ape it.