Mayweather= 46% Everyone Else= 16%

like i said 2 boxers since then one of them collazo was knocked down wat once or twice the other was BEAST ASS COTTO pre plaster Collazo true enough was a boxer,and Shane took care of business, but Collazo led with feints as if he was a power puncher which made him ripe lol. You cant deny that.

im picking floyd to win but its not impossible for mosley to win if he lands some hard shots What was James Toney's connect percentage before he came from behind to stop Michael Nunn? There are a million fights where one punch changes everything. Don't discount it happening. I personally believe Mayweather will win, but anyone can fall when hit just right. Never said impossible, the possibility is always there, i said logical. It makes no sense to say "Mosely is going to knock mayweather out" based upon Mayweather's historic defense.

how many boxers has he fought since then? 4, losing one.

WTF? My definitions are NOT AS limited as yours. As far as I can see he's ko'ed 39 boxers. lol thats what im saying lol, to each their own. Im not trying to change your opinion of what a boxer is. My point is it has been yrs since he KO'd someone who's not a slugger, how is it logical to assume he will KO someone who only allows a 16% connection percentage.

so vargas is a slugger and not a boxer? never said that, and yes he is a boxer.... 4 yrs ago.

So no one can be a boxer-puncher, a slugger-that boxes, or any other combination? They have to be just one according to you. lol, combine them how ever you choose. When was the last time he KO'd a combination there of, that began with Boxer.

that can be said with pretty much any boxer for the most part. pacquiao gets flack, klits do as well. True, but seeing as Mayweather is more hated, its much louder.

The way I saw it was Margarito was the WBA- THE WORLD BOXING ASSOCIATION CHAMP. To me that says he boxed and was a slugger. fixd. . . .

No, i feel like no matter who Mayweather fights there will be excuses, sans Paul Williams. that can be said with pretty much any boxer for the most part. pacquiao gets flack, klits do as well.

Styles make fights and theres a reaon it literally took a natural disaster for Floyd to agree to fight Shane at this point. Shane is a tough match for him for obvious reasons. . . even if he doesnt get the win he will put him thru hell.

LETS SEE KOD VARGAS BEat collazo lost to cotto kod mayorga then kod margarito 3 of his last 5 fights so wat are you talking about when u ask for his last ko vs someone i didnt say someone, i didnt say brawler, i didnt say puncher, I said boxer...

That's not what it says in the dictionary if you are going to quibble on definitions. ok, sure, there is no difference between a boxer and a slugger.

so..Margarito = boxer?:fing02: No, slugger.

so..Margarito = boxer?:fing02:

So he is a golfer? Slugger. . . .

Margarito. TS: so you agree mayweather is picking on an old man? and if he wins it wont mean that much. No, i feel like no matter who Mayweather fights there will be excuses, sans Paul Williams.

everyone with gloves on is not a boxer. . .

Mayorga. Ey truth be told Mayorga gave Shane hell...lol. Margarito. TS: so you agree mayweather is picking on an old man? and if he wins it wont mean that much.