Carl Froch's post fight interview after Dirrell was ridiculous

Dirrell deserved that win.

froch is as ridiculous out of the ring as he is in it terrible robbery

Dirrell was robbed.

God damn I cant stand Froch.

He is a poor mans Andrate.

Froch has no respect for other fighters The guy has great heart but no boxing skills at all His time will come soon, don't think he handle his first loss well at all Dirrell clearly won that fight, no question about it I agree, it'll be a Hatton style breakdown.

Froch has no respect for other fighters The guy has great heart but no boxing skills at all His time will come soon, don't think he handle his first loss well at all Dirrell clearly won that fight, no question about it

I thought he was bob on with what he said. You can't steal a title away from a champion, you have to win it outright. Froch got his ass kicked, you still have to land punches to ****ing win a fight. He got out-boxed and to be honest when dirrel did exchange with him he got the better of that too, AND wobbled froch pretty bad. He will lose a decision to kessler unless he lands that right uppercut, which is pretty much the only punch he throws with any technique. He would get knocked out by ward inside 8 rounds, I have no doubts

I said it before and I will say it again the only impressive thing about Froch that night was his girlfriend. Bravo to him for that though.

I'm looking forward to Kessler destroying Froch to be honest.

was just rewatching the fight :booty: It was the first time that I heard somebody say about his opponents style: He was negative *loooooooooooooooooooooool* Never heard that before... I personally don't understand 1.) the hate Froch generates, he seems to be a fun-trash talking guy, with not the biggest skill but someone who comes to fight and 2.) how anybody could have scored the fight for Froch... I'm really sorry to play Mr. Lederman here but being negative isn't a criteria of how boxing gets judged... Dirrell landed more, crisper, threw as many punches as Froch (the aggressor should usually out throw the boxer)--- he also held more and was more on the mat (but that ain't criterias to judge a fight)

please Kessler knock this guys head off!!!

was just rewatching the fight :booty: I thought he was bob on with what he said. You can't steal a title away from a champion, you have to win it outright.

Froch looked so nervous before the scores were called out, he knew he lost. I hate this sh*t about boxing, i mean what is actually done about these dodgy decisions?? Ok so this wasn't the biggest robbery I've ever seen but Dirrell should have won that fight, it's as simple as that. I'm all for home advantage, I think if you go to someones hometown you have to really earn the win to take the belt home, but that was taking the piss. Why are the judges not held accountable to explain their scorecards? I know it's hard to argue against someones personal opinion, but are there not some sort of guidelines to scoring a fight?? i have no idea how the judging system works, but it needs sorted out, especially for title fights like this.

Eh, Carl Froch will tell you how he feels, he's an honest guy. The thing is, he's borderline delusional and arrogant.

You think that's bad? Check out Dirrell's pre match antics.

froch has got a very good chin an a bitta boxing ability but he is probably the worst in the super 6 like dirrell won that hands down.serious girlfriend tho

his arrogant delusion knows no bounds. it is funny as **** though carl froch's trash talking >>>>>>>>> david haye's lol i wouldnt go that far. david haye>>>

Dirrell deserved the decision. He landed the cleaner, more telling punchers in the fight. Froch just seemed rather confused by Dirrell's speed, elusiveness, and style. Froch was pretty lucky to keep his title. But I've seen alot worse decisions in my time. Paulie

I make him right. Bang on Carl.