Boxers who are Losers...

I thought this was common knowledge. Everybody knows how this side of the sport works, which is why I think this thread won't get much attention. Up and coming fighters take 1-2 of these fights a month, compile an undefeated record of about 30-0 and then get bigger fights. Those guys are fighters that just aren't very good, which is why they don't win or get any recognition. I'm not sure it's common knowledge that fighters will fight under aliases so they can fight 12 times in a month in different states. The article gives recognition, however little it may be, to guys who otherwise don't get any. It puts a name and human side to fighters that help keep this sport alive, instead of them just being, "that guy that (top prospect) knocked out cold." To each their own. I thought it was a good and interesting article.

I thought this was common knowledge. Everybody knows how this side of the sport works, which is why I think this thread won't get much attention. Up and coming fighters take 1-2 of these fights a month, compile an undefeated record of about 30-0 and then get bigger fights. Those guys are fighters that just aren't very good, which is why they don't win or get any recognition.

Thanks for posting that article. Just like in the real world, most people will never shine; they'll just go about their business and survive from day to day. These journeyman fighters are no different. They fill a necessary role, while holding out no real aspirations of their own. It's not pretty, but that's life. The article shows that professional boxing is much more like professional wrestling than we'd like to admit.

Its a shame shit like this doesnt get read.. I was on leftys radio show talking about this.. good content, falls right to the bottom.. good article

Should I change the title to "Fraud Duckweather is a homo", or "PROOF Pac is on roids"?