Al Bernstein: "Floyd and his minions killed the Pacquiao fight."

bumping this up for the sake of hardcore flomoism

AL >>>>>>>>>>>> united Flomos including some Cottards hahahaha so true buddy.

AL >>>>>>>>>>>> united Flomos including some Cottards

I've seen threads like this before. You can always come back with the last word and make it look like you're right, or you can state your points and let it be. In an internet forum, the guy who is the most determined will usually "win" the argument, not necessarily the one who's right. Do you have anything else to add Phil? Except claiming how a document (that was passed back and forth and pored over countless times by lawyers) contained some sort of misunderstanding? Like...wait...did we miss the part about OSTs? GTFOH with that, man. Even Pacquiao's own team didn't use that excuse but here you are making one up for them.

Im Dazed destroyed this thread. Good stuff. How can it be desroyed? Unless Im Dazed can challenge Bernstein to a debate in public.

This means Flyod is scared of Pac all along. End of story.:bottle: we can lock this thread right now

This means Flyod is scared of Pac all along. End of story.:bottle:

Im Dazed destroyed this thread. Good stuff.

one huge prob with your tought. we dont have 10s of millions staring us in our face as well as an asterisk sitting above our name the pac does. so he doesnt have this "dont mess with me attitude" as your would like to put it No he doesn't

Suspecting someone and publicly accusing and humiliating someone are two different things, buddy. Why would you accuse w/o a single iota of proof while you're trying to negotiate a deal ? Example: "Hey Flicker, you and I can make a lot of $$$ together, but you're using drugs and even bullets bounce off you, so lets take a test together. Instead of: Hey Flicker, you and I can make a lot of $$$ together, and I have a great idea, I think our fight would be a great stage to introduce Olympic Style testing, we can serve as pioneers in our beloved sport. Now, doesn't that sound much better. It doesn't guarantee that the other party would agree, but it's alot better than publicly accusing w/o proof in hopes of cornering them. ^^^ this one for me. Pac did what most of you are doing, dont-mess-with-me attitude. Simple.

truth lol youre in denial.. go read it up and come back with proof im lying.. cus its sounding like u r crying :nono and i dont mean come at me with diffrent types of detecting whos blood doping or not, that's one method i wrote and the one u said is another.. LOL Yet another detection strategy has been to regard any apparently unnatural population of RBCs as evidence of blood doping. RBC population in the blood is usually reported as hematocrit (HCT) or as the concentration of hemoglobin (Hb). HCT is the fraction of blood by volume occupied by red blood cells. A normal HCT is 41-50% in adult men and 36-44% in adult women. Hemoglobin (Hb) is the iron-containing protein that binds oxygen in RBCs. Normal Hb levels are 14-17 g/dL of blood in men and 12-15 g/dL in women. For most healthy persons the two measurements are in close agreement. WADA is funding research projects aimed at developing a test for autologous transfusions. In order to further improve detection of abnormal blood profiles, WADA is leading the development of a strategy against doping in sport called the Athlete Passport, which is based on following athlete's biological variables over time. The objective of this strategy, which will be added to other anti-doping strategies including "traditional" testing, is to detect abnormal variations of determined biological variables in order to better target testing and/or sanction those found with abnormal variations.

it would, every drug that can be detectable can be detected through the blood testing itself irregardless of the fact if they have his blood b4 hand or not much like urine.. if its there its there 2nd how r u gonna ask me a question and quote the answer at the same time.... hehehe helllooo peace out flomo That's false. In order to find out if someone has been blood doping you'd have to track the # of RBCs. Cut it out, man you aren't fooling everyone.

well there's no PEDS that involve blood doping, blood doping is just blood doping, you take about a pint from your own blood in advance and store that until the day of the fight to use it, that can be detected after the fight because your REDBLOOD CELLS(RBCS) stay in the system for at least 120 days synthetic EPO does try to increase the level of RBCs release in the system that one would normally make naturally.. via the bone marrow.. or is it kidney.. its one of the two i cant remember and it can theoretically give you a higher oxygen carrying capacity therefore more endurace.. AT LEAST IN THEORY.. but there's a urinalysis for that as far as detecting blood doping itself, you either look for needle markings or have a blood test at the end of a fight it can measure the diffrence between MATURE RBCS and ones that r just made in the system and have been release.. its usually 50-50-50.. u have the immature RBCS that are released 7 days from the bone marrow and r still growing.. the 20-80th day RBCS and the fully mature 90-120 old rbcs.. any inequality between the two would show a person ****ing their red blood cell count and raised red flags im not drug testing experts by the way i just read this shiit How would a blood test at the end of a fight show anything unless there have been prior blood tests to gauge that person's body? Second, how do you know one has been blood doping? I'm no expert BTW, I just read this sh*t.

All of that is irrelevant. I think you meant nonsensical. I mean...what does this even mean: Why was there no issue 40 fights before pacman all of a sudden it is Pac's fault :lol1:

All of that is irrelevant. irrelevant? It is why you got people like you saying this shit is irrelevant.

Are you blind.. Do you only see what you want to see? you sure ain't biased, you can't even answer those simple questions.... Why was there an issue? Because some ass wipe got paranoid. Why was there no issue 40 fights before pacman all of a sudden it is Pac's fault.. hahahaha! lies and contradictions, shit man thats weak, really it is. I answered each one. Try comprehending. BTW, I agree with the second bolded :lol1:

You did. By raising an example of Floyd having a change of heart at the last second. Do you think he was in the right? If so, why not? Second, I don't care what Senior said. I do care about what Pacquiao did. And finally, negotiations aren't final until they are final. This is not the issue. The issue is...why was there an issue? And then..why all the lies and contradictions? Are you blind.. Do you only see what you want to see? you sure ain't biased, you can't even answer those simple questions.... Why was there an issue? Because some ass wipe crack head got paranoid to begin with. Why was there no issue 40 fights before pacman all of a sudden it is Pac's fault.. hahahaha! lies and contradictions, shit man thats weak, really it is.

And your other response is? See above.

So there is his answer. And your other point is?

........So? So there is his answer.