"Whatever tests they want them to take, Shane will submit to that. We are not going to do other tests than the Nevada commission requires," Schaefer said. "The fact is Shane is not a cheater and he does not need to be treated like one."
with the current random test issue with pacman vs floyd
Floyd does have a history. Hence he made the concession. It should be noted that Floyd has NEVER gone above 147 only the catchweight for JMM. What other times did Floyd do this?
Arum represent Pacman. What's your point? Pacman declined it through his promoter.
LOL@you trying to spin it.
Did the boxing commission requires that Random Test?
Would you mind posting that Roach and Pacman declined the offer? Just a Link is appreciated.
Arum did declined the offer and never pacman.
Floyd has a history of going beyond the weight required. Did manny tested possitive?
why push the random test if we have boxing commission to handle things out?
Floyd does have a history. Hence he made the concession. It should be noted that Floyd has NEVER gone above 147 only the catchweight for JMM. What other times did Floyd do this?
Arum represent Pacman. What's your point? Pacman declined it through his promoter.
LOL@you trying to spin it.
Would you mind posting that Roach and Pacman declined the offer? Just a Link is appreciated.
Arum did declined the offer and never pacman.
Floyd has a history of going beyond the weight required. Did manny tested possitive?
why push the random test if we have boxing commission to handle things out?
Rejecting the 14 days cut off is reasonable enough. Pacman is not obliged to those demands. There's a commission that he needs to submit to and that is how boxing should be. going outside the box is a different story.
Uh you do realize that roach in late December said that a FIVE DAY window would be good enough right?
And then they reject 14 days.
Your sorry excuses about "not obliged" aside (Was Floyd obliged to accept Pac's weight limit 1 million dollar penalty demand? NO)- explain how they said five days was okay before but fourteen days is not okay now.
And then justify why Floyd made that concession about the weight penalty (Pac had reason to put that there) when Pac won't make any concession for Floyd's doubts.
Good luck.
"Whatever tests they want them to take, Shane will submit to that. We are not going to do other tests than the Nevada commission requires," Schaefer said. "The fact is Shane is not a cheater and he does not need to be treated like one."
with the current random test issue with pacman vs floyd
It tells me that both fighters in both cases are cheaters.
Rejecting the 14 days cut off is reasonable enough. Pacman is not obliged to those demands. There's a commission that he needs to submit to and that is how boxing should be. going outside the box is a different story.
pacman knows he wont be caught with ordinary tests thats why he is willing to take them . boxing fans should want to have clean fighters
Do you think all black guys look alike?
Mosely != Floyd.
Golden boy is obligated to do whatever their fighters ask them to do. Doesn't mean they were right or wrong about Shane.
How do you reconcile your boyfriend Pac rejecting a 14 day window offered by Floyd when roach previously said 5 days would be good enough?
Rejecting the 14 days cut off is reasonable enough. Pacman is not obliged to those demands. There's a commission that he needs to submit to and that is how boxing should be. going outside the box is a different story.
"Whatever tests they want them to take, Shane will submit to that. We are not going to do other tests than the Nevada commission requires," Schaefer said. "The fact is Shane is not a cheater and he does not need to be treated like one."
with the current random test issue with pacman vs floyd
Do you think all black guys look alike?
Mosely != Floyd.
Golden boy is obligated to do whatever their fighters ask them to do. Doesn't mean they were right or wrong about Shane.
How do you reconcile your boyfriend Pac rejecting a 14 day window offered by Floyd when roach previously said 5 days would be good enough?