Would be take a criminal's word? Floyd sr

I don't get it. In real life, if we had to choose who to believe, between let's say, a criminal and a normal average joe...you would believe the criminal? I wouldn't. Now just because a ex-con starts making false accusations about pacman then everybody (those gullible enough) starts thinking negatively. Sorry but manny pacquiao had a test 24 days before the fight vs hatton so he clearly doesn't have a problem with testing 30 days b4 fights. What he clearly does have a problem with is being singled out for 'extra tests' beyond what is normally required. Now if you make manny take extra random tests...make it a rule of thumb for everybody else in boxing. Otherwise i can see how manny will get pissed off because he isn't being treated fairly. He is being treated as a criminal which is totally wrong. Bottom line...don't trust ex-cons. is he a criminal or a ex-con?!?.....ex means former or prior.....the ex-champ can't be seen as the champ anymore......of course we can call him champ but outta respect.......so I guess you callin' Sr. a criminal outta DISRESPECT!!....as far as your bottom line goes, ex-cons are what they are because of human actions!!......NOT human nature!!......you can CHANGE human actions, NOT human nature!! :luvbed:

typo: would you take a criminal's word