lol, no your not guilty. you get done for a lesser charge of failing to provide a specimin.
But judge make you pay bigger fine if you say you dont like black cat so no take test
The whole point is to making sure people dont dope.This shows how dirty boxing is and how clean soccer is.If anything people should be praising Floyd Mayweather for trying to clean the sport,his team has suggested something all the commissions should have suggested in 1980.I cant believe Sulaiman was stupid enough to back Manny out of blood testing.With such old farts at the reigns what less did we expect?
I agree that Floyd wants to make sure it is clean since he would be potentially at the receiving end of a punch from a fighter he doubts. but those who are chiming in with him sure are hypocrites, with schaeffer and hoya not wanting to test mosley when zab asked for it, and ellerbe not seeing it fit to want a test in the berto-mosley fight. those hypocrites only want to make it clean when it suits them.
In soccer if you miss a test you will be automatically suspended and fined heavily.Ask Rio Ferdinand.
aye it is, but that is soccer, and this is boxing, where olympic style testing is not mandated. who knows? this fight could lead to it being the standard.
When Mayweather tells Reloaded to bend over to sodomize him in a gay club and Reloaded agrees, is Reloaded guilty of being gay? :dunno:
This post come from where in brain ? , you like boy yes ?
This is clearly an Alt-name who is trying to hide his/her writing style with horrid syntax.
It is also a horrible analogy and takes away from true sincere, intelligent debate and discussions on this matter.
At least have the balls to use your regular Username.
You like Pink Panther , bungling inspector looking for PEDs , ha make joke
he was just asking for other opinions. that wasnt a satment that was a question.
It may have been in the form of a question, but read his post again, he was implying what i said he was implying.
This is clearly an Alt-name who is trying to hide his/her writing style with horrid syntax.
It is also a horrible analogy and takes away from true sincere, intelligent debate and discussions on this matter.
At least have the balls to use your regular Username.
Now you don't think he is guilty? you started the Thread with this:
You were implying that no test=guilty.
You just contradicted yourself fortunecookie.
he was just asking for other opinions. that wasnt a satment that was a question.
No me think Pac not guilty , but test must come because opponent in battle ask for , have this simple test is showing good man and good sportman , is honorable thing to do .
Now you don't think he is guilty? you started the Thread with this:
If you refuse alcohol test then why does law say guilty? Me think drug test the same , yes ?
You were implying that no test=guilty.
You just contradicted yourself fortunecookie.
Magic 8ball/ fortune cookie TS,
If you are sooo convinced that Pacquiao is guilty, then why are there no sanctions/charges/arrests yet?
No me think Pac not guilty , but test must come because opponent in battle ask for , have this simple test is showing good man and good sportman , is honorable thing to do .
if the driver in the lane next to you tells you to take a sobriety test do you take it?
Yes because only policemen ask you to do this , ha trick question and you fall in , that is my focus if you refuse authority asking you go to jail because auto make guilty , this just same in public eye .
Floyd is opponent in fight he is only one in the world can ask Manny for this , Manny should be good sportmans for all peoples to see and have test same as Floyd have test .
16y ago
If you refuse alcohol test why does law say guilty | BoxingScene Community