Boxingscene dumbies and the OVERUSED term "shot"

Everytime somebody loses alot of you idiots proclaim them to be "shot" without any evidence. Before you call somebody shot EXPLAIN scientifically how their shot. If this forum was around at the time Duran got kicked out by Hearns 90% of you idiots would have said he was shot but the truth is he just couldn't beat Hearns, he didn't have the style. I would love to see a Trinidad/Cotto fight at a catchweight, the Trinidad who fought Roy Jones was still the same ole Trinidad, he could have never beaten Roy Jones, I thought Trinidad was going to move to 160 and fight Pavlik and it would have been a pick em fight in my opinion. The de la hoya who lost to mayweather WAS NOT SHOT, but he was against Pacquiao how? because he had no energy and wasn't throwing any punches. When a fighter is SHOT they SKILLWISE aren't the same, if a guy just loses to a better fighter that doesn't make him shot. Roy Jones is shot, Evander Holyfield is shot, Ricky Hatton MAY have been drained against Pacquiao because people forget but after Mayweather he did beat 2 CHAMPIONS in Urango and Malgnaggi, theirs also no proof of Cotto being shot possibly weight drained because he looked slow against Pacquiao. Or maybe Pacquiao is that fast and makes people look slow, I don't know.