Pactards claim that him losing blood need the fight would somehow affect his performance. What a load of crap, Usian Bolt was blood tested 8 times during the Olympic games, in a space of a month and he went on to smash the records easily.
The blood test would only require a teaspoon of blood, Pacman has lost a of blood during his belt against Morales,JMM and Cotto. I don’t see why a small sample before a fight should affect him at all
Pactards claim that him losing blood need the fight would somehow affect his performance.
Post quotes and links to back up your argument. Thanks.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
"First of all, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency agreed that they won’t take blood from the fighters 48 hours before the fight as some people seem to think. They’re going to take only a few tablespoons through random testing in the three months leading up to the fight."
http://www.ringtv.com/blog/1457/de_la_hoya_blog_pacquiaomayweather_impasse/
Then who is holding up the fight
"First of all, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency agreed that they won’t take blood from the fighters 48 hours before the fight as some people seem to think. They’re going to take only a few tablespoons through random testing in the three months leading up to the fight."
http://www.ringtv.com/blog/1457/de_la_hoya_blog_pacquiaomayweather_impasse/
theres a difference between blood at battle and blood just sitting around..
???? i guess u havent blead during a fight in your life b4...
Of course, there is. You lose more blood in a fight than a small test requires. I lost more blood from a punch to my eye than steroid test requires