Answer me flomos.....

This is the 89th failed analogy by a pactard apologist today. You guys should pool all of your batshit scenarios together and then vote on which one is is cleverist. Pacquiao will still look like a cheater though. He wont if he wins in court...

It really baffles me that we are fans of a sport where, in a mega fight like this, one of the men is refusing his opponents request to testing for performance enhancing drugs and some of you are going, 'well, uh, gee- why should he? The commission is fine without it.' The boxing commissions that let Vargas, Mosley, etc. slip past their testing, and who later we found had been doping for some time. The same commissions that failed to notice Margarito's hand wrapping abnormalities until Nazim Richardson stepped in. The same commissions that don't use instant replay, who don't have a review board for officials - and who allow judges to make some horribly erroneous, ridiculous scores- far too often- and keep their jobs. This is a professional sport. Pacquiao was poised to make, what- in excess of $20 million, right? For that he can't just step up and take random drug tests? And you want to compare that to statutory rape? God. These forums are getting infected with ridiculous threads and opinions based on emotion and very little logic.... vargas got caught............... you might have forgotten. as with james toney, a few times non the less, they caught various other fighters too, so they aren't that inept. not completely.

Here's a situation... If I say I slept with your 15-year old daughter or sister and then you and your sister/daughter file a lawsuit against me. Will you agree if I will demand your sister or daughter to have her genitals be checked just to prove I am wrong? Despite the fact the you know your sister or daughter well and its impossible for me to sleep with them? This is like Maywether's accusations..... If you say yes, then you will be the most untrusted and disloyal brother or father... Baseless accusations are hard to prove and will only cause a bigger damage... eh...pedo much?

This is the 89th failed analogy by a pactard apologist today. You guys should pool all of your batshit scenarios together and then vote on which one is is cleverist. Pacquiao will still look like a cheater though.

The test is not required by the commission... it is required by the opponent and subject to an agreement... If the test is required by the commission and the party invloved won't agree then you can make your own case... Everyone can demand whatever he want in his favor and advantage and Floyd is taking advantage.. Pac will not allow those advantages.. It really baffles me that we are fans of a sport where, in a mega fight like this, one of the men is refusing his opponents request to testing for performance enhancing drugs and some of you are going, 'well, uh, gee- why should he? The commission is fine without it.' The boxing commissions that let Vargas, Mosley, etc. slip past their testing, and who later we found had been doping for some time. The same commissions that failed to notice Margarito's hand wrapping abnormalities until Nazim Richardson stepped in. The same commissions that don't use instant replay, who don't have a review board for officials - and who allow judges to make some horribly erroneous, ridiculous scores- far too often- and keep their jobs. This is a professional sport. Pacquiao was poised to make, what- in excess of $20 million, right? For that he can't just step up and take random drug tests? And you want to compare that to statutory rape? God. These forums are getting infected with ridiculous threads and opinions based on emotion and very little logic....

.....That is the worst example ever. This is the case of a professional athlete, poised to make tens of millions of dollars and gain even more international fame, refusing a test to detect performance enhancing drugs. Your example was more than just a stretch- it was the type of superfluous logic that keeps me off these forums more often than not. The test is not required by the commission... it is required by the opponent and subject to an agreement... If the test is required by the commission and the party invloved won't agree then you can make your own case... Everyone can demand whatever he want in his favor and advantage and Floyd is taking advantage.. Pac will not allow those advantages..

Did you just admit to being a pedo? :dead1:

Keep stuff like this in the lounge homie!

WTF is this...

Here's a situation... If I say I slept with your 15-year old daughter or sister and then you and your sister/daughter file a lawsuit against me. Will you agree if I will demand your sister or daughter to have her genitals be checked just to prove I am wrong? Despite the fact the you know your sister or daughter well and its impossible for me to sleep with them? This is like Maywether's accusations..... If you say yes, then you will be the most untrusted and disloyal brother or father... Baseless accusations are hard to prove and will only cause a bigger damage... .....That is the worst example ever. This is the case of a professional athlete, poised to make tens of millions of dollars and gain even more international fame, refusing a test to detect performance enhancing drugs. Your example was more than just a stretch- it was the type of superfluous logic that keeps me off these forums more often than not.