Should Floyd be really ranked ahead of Manny all time even if he wins? No fanboys
READ my post before saying i am insane. Please.
I was doing serious thinking. People say this fight is to prove who is the best in our era. Well should one fight really decide this? Why not their resumes and what they accomplished opposed to one fight?
Floyd Mayweather won belts at 130, 135, 140, 147, and 154. Two Legitimate titles at 135 and 147.
Manny Pacquiao won belts at 147, 140, 135, 130, 126, 122, 112. Three legitimate titles at 126, 130, and 140.
Mayweather's best wins are Juan Manuel Marquez, Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton, Zab Judah, Jose Luis Castillo, and Diego Corrales (RIP). Marquez and De La Hoya in my opinion are the only 2 Hall of fame locks on his resume.
Pacquiao's best wins are, Miguel Cotto, Ricky Hatton, Oscar De La Hoya, Juan Manuel Marquez, Erik Morales, Marco Antonio Barrera. Once again in my opinion, De La Hoya, Marquez, Morales, and Barrera are four Hall of fame locks. And Cotto is on the cusp.
As you can see Pacquiao's resume is far more impressive than Floyd's in every way possible. And he has also accomplished more and beaten the far better fighters.
Whatever Mayweather has done Pacquiao out did it times two.
I dont think Mayweather should be placed ahead of Manny all time unless he convincingly beats him. Any close decision he deserves to be number 1 pound for pound fighter but not ranked ahead of Manny all time or the best of his era.
Beating Manny would be a great start to being called best of our era, i still think he would need one more win or two to be ranked above the Pacman.
I am prepared to get flamed. I am not a sensitive poster who will go reporting.
:gay: