Simple question, is DLH the most robbed fighter in the history of boxing? I mean the fights with Tito, Shane, and even FLOYD. Has anyone been screwed by the judges more times than Oscar himself?
Simple question, is DLH the most robbed fighter in the history of boxing? I mean the fights with Tito, Shane, and even FLOYD. Has anyone been screwed by the judges more times than Oscar himself?
Glen Johnson knows who.
Simple question, is DLH the most robbed fighter in the history of boxing? I mean the fights with Tito, Shane, and even FLOYD. Has anyone been screwed by the judges more times than Oscar himself?
I agree with you the SSM fights were closey contested so was the Tito fight but he did run and hide for the last few rounds...He was given gifts in my mind against Quartey and Sturm so it goes both ways in the sport. That is why you try to never leave it in the judges hands my friends...lefty
Oscar - Whitaker: could have gone either way.
Oscar - Ike: Close but Oscar won by 114-112.
Oscar - Tito: Close fight but it was pretty much obvious that Oscar won.
Oscar - Shane 1: Oscar lost.
Oscar - Shane 2: Ah! Oscar won 116-112 against a fighter on roids.
Oscar - Sturm: Oscar lost but it wasn't that monster robbery... O_o
oscar - Floyd: quite close but Floyd deserved the decision.
IMO Oscar gave away Floyd fight without throwing his jab which was way dangerous and gave an excuse against Trinidad dancing to much with the main difference that Oscar lost to Floyd and won against Tito.
He won against Shane II, period. No excuses.
Ike e Pernell fights were damn close, Pernell's in particular.
He lost to Sturm, period.
DLH should have entered against BHOP 39-1 IMO.
I had Ike winning a close fight..
Sturm fight was a clear robbery!! Noway in hell could any give it to DLH
Simple question, is DLH the most robbed fighter in the history of boxing? I mean the fights with Tito, Shane, and even FLOYD. Has anyone been screwed by the judges more times than Oscar himself?
Oscar - Whitaker: could have gone either way.
Oscar - Ike: Close but Oscar won by 114-112.
Oscar - Tito: Close fight but it was pretty much obvious that Oscar won.
Oscar - Shane 1: Oscar lost.
Oscar - Shane 2: Ah! Oscar won 116-112 against a fighter on roids.
Oscar - Sturm: Oscar lost but it wasn't that monster robbery... O_o
oscar - Floyd: quite close but Floyd deserved the decision.
IMO Oscar gave away Floyd fight without throwing his jab which was way dangerous and gave an excuse against Trinidad dancing to much with the main difference that Oscar lost to Floyd and won against Tito.
He won against Shane II, period. No excuses.
Ike e Pernell fights were damn close, Pernell's in particular.
He lost to Sturm, period.
DLH should have entered against BHOP 39-1 IMO.
son are you kidding? first off he ran backwards in the tito fight for the 2nd half of the fight.
in the hopkins fight he TOOK A DIVE and was knocked out so wtf does that have to do with the judges?
in the SSM fights were close but SSM took it.
Yeah, I think he took a dive in the first fight with Bhop. Why? Only he knows.
I had him winning the last Mosely fight and he should definately get it now its a known fact that Shane was roided up for that fight.
When is Shane going to get banned anyway?
he threw the fight with tito away, he was stopped by bernard so no idea what the judges have to do with that one
floyd fight was close but he was luck to even have the one judge in his corner to be honest
and lets not forget the gift he got against Pernell
I think the fight was a 12 round fight. Oscar easily won the first seven rounds. Also theres a reason TITO never wanted the rematch.
Whitaker, Sturn, Quartey were clearly robbed. I thought OSCAR BEAT MOSLEY both fights but it was close both times.
http://www.borntoexpire.com/images/itsalwayssunny/its-always-sunny-charlie-laughing-couch.gif
Come on man. De La Hoya got the benefit of the doubt against Whitaker and Quartey, he clearly lost the first fight to Mosley, and he clearly lost to Mayweather. The only fights he might have been robbed in were Mosley II and the Trinidad fight, and against Trinidad he gave the fight away in the second half, Oscar has no one to blame but himself.
I would actually say the opposite - Oscar has been given opportunities because he was the "Golden Boy" that no one else would have gotten. I think he is a great marketer and done some great things with promoting - but he is FAR from the "most robbed fighter." Like many have pointed out he was KOed by B-hop - a robbery? This thread cant be serious.
It's Glen Johnson.
Yeah, but how many times was Johnson actually robbed. Post the fights you saw and what your scores were. I haven't seen enough of the supposed robberies Johnson was in. I thought he got away with one in the first Tarver fight, and he deserved a draw against Dawson first time but not a win.
De La Hoya-Whitaker = De La Hoya deserved to win close
De La Hoya-Quartey = Quartey deserved to win but not a robbery
De La Hoya-Trinidad = De La Hoya robbed
De La Hoya-Mosley I = Clear Mosley win
De La Hoya-Mosley II = De La Hoya robbed
De La Hoya-Sturm = Sturm robbed
De La Hoya-Mayweather = Clear Mayweather win
he's been in the most controversial decisions, but he's only been robbed twice, and he got away with one against Sturm
He beat Shane in the rematch and Tito. He lost to Ike, Whitaker, Strum and especially (Can't believe you said Floyd) especially Mayweather. B-Hop K.O'd Oscar, that isn't a robbery.
Simple question, is DLH the most robbed fighter in the history of boxing? I mean the fights with Tito, Shane, Bernard, and even FLOYD. Has anyone been screwed by the judges more times than Oscar himself?
he threw the fight with tito away, he was stopped by bernard so no idea what the judges have to do with that one
floyd fight was close but he was luck to even have the one judge in his corner to be honest
and lets not forget the gift he got against Pernell
16y ago
Is Oscar De La Hoya the most ROBBED fighter in the history of boxing? | BoxingScene Community