take a look at this i am not sure why ref ruled it a KD there was no punch from Barrera he shoud've ruled it a slip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwwtz99gTaI
look at replay from 4:04-4-11
Yo people, how about some compassion. So what if it was ruled a KD? I think it's only fair Pacman spots his opponents KDs. He's gonna beat their ass anyway, I think handicapping would be cool. I would like Pacman to spot Gayweather 3 KDs and purposely fall down 3 times in the first round. I don't want Pac to embarrass the guy. Sure he's a jackass, but he's our jackass. Compassion people!
Barrera stepped on Pac's foot and he lost his balance. However in hindsight that KD call was probably the turning point in Pac's career as he went all out after that to try and gain some ground. And as they say the rest is history.
Without that call it would have been possible that Pac would have been satisfied just doing what he was doing in round 1 before that KD call.
OK, own up. Who are the 3 goons who voted YES?
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
You guys remember near the end of round 6? Pac dropped Barrera with a similar punch he dropped Cotto in the 4th, and Ref "Clueless" Cole ruled that one a SLIP. He robbed Pac 2 points (including the 1st round FALSE KD)... not that Pac needed those points because he was dishing out a one sided beat down on Barrera, but still... :ugh1:
on barrera 1 pt deduction.
Minus 10 pts wouldnt hurt him - Jim Lampley
Lampley covered the fight in ALamo and yet he mentioned that PAC was down againts Barrera. memory lapses??
Another error by Lampley was he keeps saying "Cotto is trying to make this a nine nine round" in round 3. He mentioned it at least 3 times....
Its suppose to be 10-8 and if cotto impresses then its 10-9 not 9-9. Two Judges had it at 10-9.
Lampley is getting old.
I heard it in the British commentary too "he was down against Barrera..." something like that... lol.
You guys remember near the end of round 6? Pac dropped Barrera with a similar punch he dropped Cotto in the 4th, and Ref "Clueless" Cole ruled that one a SLIP. He robbed Pac 2 points (including the 1st round FALSE KD)... not that Pac needed those points because he was dishing out a one sided beat down on Barrera, but still... :ugh1:
take a look at this i am not sure why ref ruled it a KD there was no punch from Barrera he shoud've ruled it a slip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwwtz99gTaI
look at replay from 4:04-4-11
Nah, terrible refereeing. Just a slip. Manny wasn't happy about that, and I think it made him fight even better, so maybe it's not a bad thing after all.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3
Lampley covered the fight in ALamo and yet he mentioned that PAC was down againts Barrera. memory lapses??
Another error by Lampley was he keeps saying "Cotto is trying to make this a nine nine round" in round 3. He mentioned it at least 3 times....
Its suppose to be 10-8 and if cotto impresses then its 10-9 not 9-9. Two Judges had it at 10-9.
Lampley is getting old.
take a look at this i am not sure why ref ruled it a KD there was no punch from Barrera he shoud've ruled it a slip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwwtz99gTaI
look at replay from 4:04-4-11
I didn't consider it a legitimate knockdown when I saw it.
yes he was officially knockdown in barrera 1 fight but the truth is he never get hit by a punch it was just that barrera step on his feet that's why he fell down and the referee didn't see it.
No way,and it pisses me of when the commentators say he was,when i was watching the Pac Cotto fight,they where like " remember,Barrera had him down in the first "... even my boxing mag said it,if they actually took time to watch the fights then maybe they would know better