you cant honestly say that he is a superb boxer of some sort. he still makes so many mistakes and punches wildly.
lets face it, his greatest assets are NATURAL: power, speed, stamina, toughness.
the above are great against guys like:
lesser skilled brawlers like barrera
faded weight drained fighters like morales
c level brawlers like diaz and hatton
20 pound shedding 36 year olds like oscar
and declining catch weight vacant belt champions like cotto
when has he looked great using his assets against a SUPERIOR fighter?
in conclusion, you cant deny that the assets i listed above are the MAIN sources of his game. you cant honestly say its his remarkable boxing ability.
so now tell me what he has that will beat a superior boxer?
you cant honestly say that he is a superb boxer of some sort. he still makes so many mistakes and punches wildly.
lets face it, his greatest assets are NATURAL: power, speed, stamina, toughness.
the above are great against guys like:
lesser skilled brawlers like barrera
faded weight drained fighters like morales
c level brawlers like diaz and hatton
20 pound shedding 36 year olds like oscar
and declining catch weight vacant belt champions like cotto
when has he looked great using his assets against a SUPERIOR fighter?
in conclusion, you cant deny that the assets i listed above are the MAIN sources of his game. you cant honestly say its his remarkable boxing ability.
so now tell me what he has that will beat a superior boxer?
Barrera is a great technician, WTf are you talking about? he was a brawler way before the pacquiao fights. Diaz is a C class fighter Hatton is a B+, he's one of the best 140 pounders in recent years.
which superior boxer (class A) did mayweather beat as impressive and as great as pac........prime....focused....not made to order........not blown up...................................losers usually have circumstance/excuse why they loss
i dont mattter if floyd has fought superior boxers, pac is not a superior boxers. floyd has fought many fighters coming at him throwing punches, apllying pressure, every thing. but has pac ever beat a superior boxer and looked great doing it?
why do people keep shitting on pacquiao when the guy keeps proving everyone wrong??
He hasn't proven me wrong yet. He avoided the best fighters at 135, forced Oscar to drain himself to 145 and demanded Cotto come down to a catchweight. Mayweather will destroy him. Then he can move back down in weight and prove me wrong about him dodging the best fighters.
It was a clear cut win for Floyd and it was 10 rounds with Hatton.
And Floyd faced fresher versions then the ones Pacquiao faced.
Since ur in a correcting mood,why didn't u correct the points about Marquez,huh??:dunno:
Give Pac his props where it's deserved. A couple of years ago I would have agreed with this post but his boxing abilities have increased so much in such a short period of time.
That being said I still see vulnerabilities in his game and I have to question his ability to adapt in the ring. So far I've seen him do what Roach has coached him to do I haven't seen him adjust his game during the fight.
you cant honestly say that he is a superb boxer of some sort. he still makes so many mistakes and punches wildly.
lets face it, his greatest assets are NATURAL: power, speed, stamina, toughness.
the above are great against guys like:
lesser skilled brawlers like barrera
faded weight drained fighters like morales
c level brawlers like diaz and hatton
20 pound shedding 36 year olds like oscar
and declining catch weight vacant belt champions like cotto
when has he looked great using his assets against a SUPERIOR fighter?
in conclusion, you cant deny that the assets i listed above are the MAIN sources of his game. you cant honestly say its his remarkable boxing ability.
so now tell me what he has that will beat a superior boxer?
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE keep underestimating pac!!!! make sure gayweather and the entire clan and all of the flomo nation keeps underestimating pac!!!
what good are power speed if you cant use them efficiently. as far as im concerned pacquiao's been using them skillfuly and t/ko'ing boxers in spectacular fashion.
like pacquiao himself, power is good and all but without knowledge there is no power. pacquiao has the knowledge of using his natural skills effectively thus making him an excellent boxer :D
i can ripped PBF's record better...........LOL...................but i wont go that far....................lol
although i did, i wasnt really trying to rip his record, i wanted to make it clear that the fighters he looked great against were not superior prime boxers.
you cant honestly say that he is a superb boxer of some sort. he still makes so many mistakes and punches wildly.
lets face it, his greatest assets are NATURAL: power, speed, stamina, toughness.
the above are great against guys like:
lesser skilled brawlers like barrera
faded weight drained fighters like morales
c level brawlers like diaz and hatton
20 pound shedding 36 year olds like oscar
and declining catch weight vacant belt champions like cotto
when has he looked great using his assets against a SUPERIOR fighter?
in conclusion, you cant deny that the assets i listed above are the MAIN sources of his game. you cant honestly say its his remarkable boxing ability.
so now tell me what he has that will beat a superior boxer?
Um,is this superior boxer u speak of,sayyyy,the same guy that won a split d over Oscar & got taken to 11 rounds against Hatton,or maybe the guy that refused to weight the contact weight against the lightweight Marquez??Is this the superior boxer u speak of,because if it is,u should be ashamed of urself!!:pat:
What... when has he beaten a superior boxer...? Ummm... NEVER!
Do you know why?
Because this is boxing and when two people fight, there can be two outcomes:
1) You loose - the other guy is the superior boxer.
2) You win - you are the superior boxer.
How can you beat a boxer and still have them labelled as superior?