Fighter of the Decade? Manny or Floyd?

He will go down as one of the greatest flyweights and was like 41-1-1 for the decade and his only lost was to a japanese fighter he had beaten twice already. It was close between Calzaghe and him for the 5th spot. But i think he dominated his division more than the undefeated Calzaghe, i wish Calzaghe fought Dawson before he retired. he defended the title 16 straight times I believe before losing to the japanese...Amazing....

Pongsaklek is a lil' badass. He will go down as one of the greatest flyweights and was like 41-1-1 for the decade and his only lost was to a japanese fighter he had beaten twice already. It was close between Calzaghe and him for the 5th spot. But i think he dominated his division more than the undefeated Calzaghe, i wish Calzaghe fought Dawson before he retired.

Pongsaklek is a lil' badass. Fell in love w/ the flyweight division..

5-Pongsaklek Wonjamkam Pongsaklek is a lil' badass. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

Fighters of the Decade 2000-2009 1-Manny Pacquiao 2-Bernard Hopkins 3-Floyd Mayweather 4-Vitali Klitschko 5-Pongsaklek Wonjamkam

In your honest opinion, which fighter is more deserving of Fighter of the Decade accolades and why? Manny. Next question?

The mayweather-pacquiao will happen on the next decade so it will not affect this

i don't know what it should be or historically but i think the most common one is you count the 0 as the start and the 9 as the last. example: 1950's = 1950-1959 it would be weird to count it as 1951-1960. 1950 wouldn't be in the 50's and 1960 would be counted as 1950's. True. But since things haven't been widely standardised across the world (people only go by whatever convention they've been brought up with), there'll always be a certain level of dubiousness as to how it should be done. Obviously the most common way is to assume a year 0 and go from there (hence 2000 being the start of the current decade, 2010 beginning the new one, and so on), but if one really stops to think about the whole year 0/1AD/1BC thing... then everything kinda makes less sense overall. So I guess the best thing to do is not to think about it at all and go with the masses. I only brought it up here because it seemed as though people were all but neglecting the concept of a decade beginning from 1 and ending with the 10 (i.e. 1991-2000). Certain idiots, then, had to take it further and onto a personal level. *shrug*

125 pac 13 gayweather bwhahahahahahahah!!! 12! i clicked the wrong option by accident! :burnup:

And we have a landslide

125 pac 13 gayweather bwhahahahahahahah!!!

Currently there are 13 idiots who voted for a coward. I suggest to the people who has yet to vote to not add urself in the list of 13 morons. 12. i clicked the wrong one by accident.

Depending on which logic you follow, 2001 was the start of the current decade, not 2000. Hence, 2001-2010 is a full decade. Likewise year 1AD-10AD. Prior to that, it's 1BC-10BC and so on. Don't ask me why they skipped year 0. It just ain't there - only retroactively. i don't know what it should be or historically but i think the most common one is you count the 0 as the start and the 9 as the last. example: 1950's = 1950-1959 it would be weird to count it as 1951-1960. 1950 wouldn't be in the 50's and 1960 would be counted as 1950's.

floyd maywhaat?

Judging from the poll results, Floyd should be more than happy with a 60/40 split in Manny's favor.

Im holding my vote until after Pac vs. Floyd has happened. Agreed........

me too... if floyd beats manny and then beats mosley in 2010 then it goes to Floyd, if not than Pacman Lmao. if u want floyd to win fighter of the decade u better hope he fights those 2 sometime in the next month and a half............

Pac - 109 PBF - 12 Close Fight.

We've only seen this thread 123456789 times... plus the fact that Floyd would nEVER win a poll on here.

Pac - Simply the most entertaing to watch and has blown the odds out of proportion many mnay times Floyd is just a skilled fighter with not much character This. When people think of their fav. fighters they think of great fights they've been in. Certain scenarios they were and overcame. I can think of a dozen things Pac has done that sticks out oppose to Floyds. Mannys heart > Floyds heart