Here's a scenario. If you only have enough money to watch one PPV event and have to make a choice between two events, one headlined by Mayweather and the other headlined by Pacquiao. With everything else being equal such as opponent, venue, etc. Who would you watch?
Don't forget to leave a reply to keep this poll going...
Depends who each is fighting...
The hypothetical scenario is based on everything else being the same including opponent, venue, etc. Basically it all boils down to just Mayweather and Pacquiao, and you just have enough for that one ppv. Who would you spend that ppv money on.
Basically it's a nice way of asking who would you spend your money on, if you had to make that single choice? Some people will find it easy, some hard but try and choose.
If I was watching a PPV alone and wanted to study the fight, Mayweather. If I wanted to watch with a bunch of people I would watch Pacquiao fight. Watching a Mayweather fight when you are drunk is not fun.
Here's a scenario. If you only have enough money to watch one PPV event and have to make a choice between two events, one headlined by Mayweather and the other headlined by Pacquiao. With everything else being equal such as opponent, venue, etc. Who would you watch?
Don't forget to leave a reply to keep this poll going...
Depends who each is fighting...
Here's a scenario. If you only have enough money to watch one PPV event and have to make a choice between two events, one headlined by Mayweather and the other headlined by Pacquiao. With everything else being equal such as opponent, venue, etc. Who would you watch?
Don't forget to leave a reply to keep this poll going...
And no promotional shit talkin' or bs by any of the Mayweathers or Roach? Pac for sure. PBF is technically impressive but not too exciting.
offensively? so how can you pick floyd?
He doesn't hit his opponents? He normally gets the major of his punches blocked?
Uhhhh... No... His connect rate is always stupid ridiculous because of the accuracy and precision... Thats domination offensively...
Thats how I could and would pick Floyd...
I might be odd but I like watching a master at his craft perform...
Manny is exciting but, I'd personally rather see a guy dominate defensively AND offensively... Not, "I'll take your punch to land 3"... I'd rather watch that type of action in the UFC... Give me a GSP fight over a Man Pac anyday... I'll watch Floyd perform with brilliance over them all, any day of the week...
offensively? so how can you pick floyd?
I might be odd but I like watching a master at his craft perform...
Manny is exciting but, I'd personally rather see a guy dominate defensively AND offensively... Not, "I'll take your punch to land 3"... I'd rather watch that type of action in the UFC... Give me a GSP fight over a Man Pac anyday... I'll watch Floyd perform with brilliance over them all, any day of the week...
Even Floyd at 147+
I don't know...I even get bored with him.
Give me Floyd below 140, yeah...great to watch.
Still think I would choose Pac though. Just like I would prefer a Prime Tyson than a Prime Ali.
I might be odd but I like watching a master at his craft perform...
Manny is exciting but, I'd personally rather see a guy dominate defensively AND offensively... Not, "I'll take your punch to land 3"... I'd rather watch that type of action in the UFC... Give me a GSP fight over a Man Pac anyday... I'll watch Floyd perform with brilliance over them all, any day of the week...
so, you're saying from the numbers is that people want pac to beat up someone and floyd to be beaten up by someone?
interesting. made a note on that.
Yup...sad but true.
People can root for Pac but for Floyd...they want to see his ass get kicked.
I said it before, Floyd is like Ty Cobb: a great athlete who is smart and highly skilled you can respect but comes off as an asshole so you don't want to see him win...while Pac is like Babe Ruth: great as well but a guy you can root for and is like a big kid.
Now not the best example but hopefully you get the point...if you even follow baseball history.
Or better yet, stick with boxing history: Floyd is Jack Johnson or Ali in his prime where people wanted them to lose and shut them up.
Pac is...Dempsey and/or Ray Leonard.
so far it looks like pacquiao is the attraction and deserves the bigger sized purse, i think 60/40 is fair.
Not how it works. It's still about the numbers in the end. People will still pay to see Floyd to see him get beat...many people. The Numbers show it. That's why Floyd will compare his numbers with the same opponents to Pac.
We've seen Pac get beat but not Floyd. Paying to see if he will lose is an attraction.
Pac for sure. Plus, everytime I have people over to watch a fight, they tend to drift from the room when Mayweather is on or sit around talking about something else...but with Pac...they stay and it's loud and crazy. Don't mind watching a fight alone but...damn...it feels awkward sometimes when people are there and leave. But hey, they all are the casual fans that like a fist-fight toe to toe so I don't get to bent over it...I understand.
Is this some kind of a trick question??
Not a trick question at all, just trying to find out in my own way who the real attraction is.
Hopefully we get a lot of members participating.
I'll watch both of them if you're talking about Boxing... If you're talking about Floyd on WWE or Manny singing.. LOL I'll pass on both of those choices...
:boxing:
Actually the poll is if you have to choose between the two and you have to make that hard choice, who would you spend that ppv money to.