Pac vs Hearns, SRl and Hagler!!!!

It doesnt matter about weights, as mike tyson said in a recent UK interview, If you can fight(properly) it doesnt matter how big you are..... Its gonna show in the fight Pacquiao is a short man, but really hes a MASSIVE Man!! Hes the boss over soo many taller guys.. The same as heavyweight boxing, theres up to 100 pounds difference

DUde, Hagler was basically a manlet. Pac would could trouble him a bit. No way does his speed offset Hearn's reach. Hearns was a monster. Hearn's chin was not the best (not glass but it was a weak point); he also got hit a lot from all sorts of angles, example the Iran Barkley KO. I'm not saying that I favor Pac over Hearns only that out of the three I think his best chance is against Hearns; the Leonard fight would also be great but I give Leonard a better chance than Hearns. Hagler was a middleweight. Pac has no chance against a quality middleweight. After all Pacman is a featherweight/ lightweight. Just beating a quality welterweight is an accomplishment in itself.

DUde, Hagler was basically a manlet. Pac would could trouble him a bit. No way does his speed offset Hearn's reach. Hearns was a monster.

I think they all beat him.

Do ya tink Pac would'a beat any od teese guys, to be harnest i dont tink he'd beat any od em.... ... People get excited coz its d first bit od greatness dey ever seen.... But in d 80z, pac would'nt have been soo great... In the 80s he would also be great. The reason everyone is talking about Pac is NOT because he is the greatest welterweight of all-time or even the last 30 years. It's the fact that a bantanweight-lightweight moved up in weight and beat a quality welterweight (after having destroyed de la Hoya and Hatton). Duran was considered great in the 80s and he didn't have the best record at welterweight. Would Pac defeat Sugar Ray probably not, but I think he would do well against Hearns. I think Pac's speed would neutralize Hearn's reach. No way could Pac defeat the middleweight Hagler.

your retarded poll doesn't allow the option that they all beat Pac. Yea i know mate, bit of a cunt ey!!!! thats what i intended to do..... make it a multiple choice aption

Boxers from the early 1900's would probably lose against the guys today. Does that mean the boxers today are automatically greater than them? Hearns, Leonard and Hagler would all beat Pacquiao badly. I don't know why you mentioned Hagler, though. He was a middleweight. It was "all 4 all" back in those days though, they used to jump around the weight classes, it was the WWs fighting the Middleweights.... etc I'm only 21, ive only seen clips of the great fighters on youtube, but all i know is i think they'd all EXCEPT duran maybe.. beat pac

Against Hearns he would be KTFO. Against Leonard he would have more of a chance. Ummm... I actually think he has the most chance against Hagler. Surely u don't mean the middleweight champ Hagler??The Hagler who is stronger than them all Hagler right??

no. just no.

Boxers from the early 1900's would probably lose against the guys today. Does that mean the boxers today are automatically greater than them? Hearns, Leonard and Hagler would all beat Pacquiao badly. I don't know why you mentioned Hagler, though. He was a middleweight.

Against Hearns he would be KTFO. Against Leonard he would have more of a chance. Ummm... I actually think he has the most chance against Hagler.