So where do you have Pacman now on your ALL-TIME LIST?

I would have said about top 30 or something like that before last night, but the way he obliterated Cotto elevates him into the top 20 easy.

I don't keep a list but he has to be up there with the best. He's the greatest fighter i've ever been able to see live.

I've never met a boxing fan that kept a list of their own opinion on the top 100 fighters of all time. Let alone constantly updated it whenever situations changed. Usually that type of shit is reserved for 60+ year old blowhards like Bert Sugar. He's definitely top 20-25 material, for sure, though.:wave: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6027007 I agree btw with 20-25 for Pacman.

would you put him ahead of Roy Jones Jnr? Pac has always been in the shadow of Floyd on the p4p list, until recently. You have to put him above roy jones..Mayweather, and up there or over Leonard and Duran. He has beaten Barrera, Morales 2 out of 3 fights, stopped hatton, dlh, and Cotto.. a pretty damm near peak Cotto would actuallly should be considered undefeated... Hatton had never been bested at 140 and brutally stopped in 2. He owns 2 wins regardless of how controversial they are, over JMM. All fighters have some controversial gifts on their resume. So with that being said, and the fact that he started at 106, and is stopping top fighters at welter, come on. He has to be rated well above Mayweather, Jones, and i could debate both ways his ranking vs Leonard. Only reason I debate the leonard is Ray victories were vs hearns, duran, benetiz, Hagler, and he did move up to beat Hagler, and then stopped lalond at a catch weight and light heavy, and stopped unbeated at the time, never been knocked down kalule. It is a very very good comparison him a SRL, but Roy Jones and Mayweather, he ranks above them.

Brian Kenny said that Bert Sugar had Pacquiao in the top 15 on ESPN not long after the post fight conference.

I've never met a boxing fan that kept a list of their own opinion on the top 100 fighters of all time. Let alone constantly updated it whenever situations changed. Usually that type of shit is reserved for 60+ year old blowhards like Bert Sugar. He's definitely top 20-25 material, for sure, though. thats funny lols

1- PACMAN And I'm Mexican :eek: :headbang:

I dont know where,but all I can say is that he is the greatest fighter of my time. would you put him ahead of Roy Jones Jnr? Pac has always been in the shadow of Floyd on the p4p list, until recently.

I think you have to be RIDICULOUSLY knowlegeable about the sport of boxing in able to make such a list. I don't even know how writers on their own can come up with one unless they were part of a bigger team of experts. You have to know all the intricate details , every fight, every division, all the opponents and their calibre each boxer has fought.It is pretty hard.

I've never met a boxing fan that kept a list of their own opinion on the top 100 fighters of all time. Let alone constantly updated it whenever situations changed. Usually that type of shit is reserved for 60+ year old blowhards like Bert Sugar. He's definitely top 20-25 material, for sure, though. QFT and the :lol1:

I've never met a boxing fan that kept a list of their own opinion on the top 100 fighters of all time. Let alone constantly updated it whenever situations changed. Usually that type of shit is reserved for 60+ year old blowhards like Bert Sugar. He's definitely top 20-25 material, for sure, though.

I dont really have a list, i believe the very best stand alone united in sharing that honour. manny is amongst them. Same here, it's all about debate where they rank but let's just remember for what Pacaquiao accomplished!