All thought froch won...lmao at the idiots on this forum...NOT ONE SAID IT WAS CONTROVEDRTIUAL, NOT ONE...
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/6664/86703088.png
http://www.********boxing.com/news.php?p=21570&more=1
http://www.rte.ie/sport/boxing/2009/1018/frochc.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/boxingandmma/6364413/Carl-Froch-defeats-Andre-Dirrell-and-claims-next-contest-with-Mikkel-Kessler-will-be-a-war.html
no he didnt hit froch plentty of times...i was actually live at the fight and his throwing ratio was terrible...froch continually threw the jab hence why dirrells face was a mess and froch had no scratches...
dirrell although veryt skillful is a horrifically boring fighter...
Is this Carl? Is that you?
I became a Froch fan after he had proven me wrong twice against Pascal and JT.He's a bad motherf*cker..........but he did not beat Dirrell.
Dirrel won that fight.
Carl Froch won 114-113 on my card.
The decision was fair, I'm even happy to see it was a SD instead of a UD because the fight was very close.
Yes, Dirrell is the more talented fighter, but his game plan STUNK. Fighters who run, fall, hold, bend and bitch for 12 rounds don't deserve to win world titles.
Agreed, plus in the end of the fight, Dirells face looked worse of Froch looked like he could have gone for a photo shoot
Decision could have gone either way, but dirrell stinks he came to avoid a fight, will be interesting to when Abrahams fights him, one of them will have to fight
Kessler or Abraham gong to win i fink
The German press is talking of a controversial, close decision win by Froch...lots of them saw the fight for Direll as well as the German commentator. Though, they said that the fight could have gone either way and a draw might be the most legitimized verdict...
so thats not controvertial then...
Not one person has come up with a legitermite rerason to me why dirrell even deserved a split loss decision yesterday...imo all three judges should have froch winning by at least 3 rounds...
My sig shows froch landing better shots...dirrells face was a mess, froch was perfect...
Farochg nwas landing jabs all night while dirrell ran like mad...
The German press is talking of a controversial, close decision win by Froch...lots of them saw the fight for Direll as well as the German commentator. Though, they said that the fight could have gone either way and a draw might be the most legitimized verdict...
obviously you are cosing your eyes when looking at my sig...btw journalists are struggling to find punches landed by dirrell in there photo files, whys that???
Whyt did dirrell have a bloodied nose and swollen face and froch was looking handsome at the end of the fight???Again froch landed some lovely jabs all night...dirrell just ran...
With that logic it seems you must be admitting old man Hopkins owned Calzaghe.....
obviously you are cosing your eyes when looking at my sig...btw journalists are struggling to find punches landed by dirrell in there photo files, whys that???
Dirrell handspeed..
Froch got rocked end round 10.
Whyt did dirrell have a bloodied nose and swollen face and froch was looking handsome at the end of the fight???Again froch landed some lovely jabs all night...dirrell just ran...
He hit with the inside of his gloves. Every face reacts diffent to punches.
For the people that think Froch actually won, I want to sit down and watch the fight and see what rounds that were giving Froch because some rounds, he didn't land a punch at all. And the round they took that point away from Dirrell was the same round he hurt Froch, which made the round 9-9 but it seems judges still scored it for Froch. I would never go to another country and fight. PERIOD, its the dumbest thing ever.
obviously you are cosing your eyes when looking at my sig...btw journalists are struggling to find punches landed by dirrell in there photo files, whys that???
Whyt did dirrell have a bloodied nose and swollen face and froch was looking handsome at the end of the fight???Again froch landed some lovely jabs all night...dirrell just ran...
CONTROVEDRTIUAL? cant say i recognize that word.....
Note:
if you put EMFASIS on a misspelled word, your probably an idiot.
Note to you, when knocking someone on spelling and grammar you should be careful of your own. You're not your. It's a conjunction for the words you and are.
Ok, I scored the fight dead even. The difference with what I saw and the reason I can udnerstand why some folks are pissed is the rounds I gave Froch were pretty tight. THe rounds I gave Dirrell were not even close. Round by round it was an even fight for me. The whole fight was dirrell's because he pasted Froch at times. Unfortunately, he doesn't want to put enough work in to take away any doubt.
you can see why boxing in American isn't as popular
all these talented fighters ... Dirrell and Berto even
need to fight more aggressively and cut out the holding.
For the people that think Froch actually won, I want to sit down and watch the fight and see what rounds that were giving Froch because some rounds, he didn't land a punch at all. And the round they took that point away from Dirrell was the same round he hurt Froch, which made the round 9-9 but it seems judges still scored it for Froch. I would never go to another country and fight. PERIOD, its the dumbest thing ever.