Dirrell did not come to win - he came to STEAL. Is he an Ottke fan?

Your sig is a joke. the only guy on queer street was Froch. Froch face was fine like he hadnt been in any fight, Dirrell landed one good punch the others were like slaps, Direll face was swallon off two or three punches it says it all, what a pu$$y he ran around the ring all fight and hugged and fell over what a clown, How is queer wanting to fight? where I come from Pu$$y are the ones who run off?

U must be mad. What boxing did Dirrell show? What counter-punching did he show. He grabbed excessively. Boxing is not scored by running around the ring fella. Huh? You are beyond bias. The ONLY COUNTER LANDED came from Dirrell. You can't argue facts. You will try but fail.

man , froch didn't even throw a lot. if froch threw more than dirrell even if he didn't land them , he'd have a better case. froch didn't even throw more punches than dirrell. the aggressor my ass. direll had no chance of winning the fight....that why his pops said go and get the KO. he knew they get robbed, no way they'll let froch lose the title in his hometown. let this be in the states we have better scoring..... and what get me is people complaining about direll cliching when froch was holding his arm and hitting him behined the head. how come people over looked that????

Coming forward isn't part of the scoring criteria. What is part of the scoring criteria is effective agression and for his agression to be effective, he would of been landing punches but, he barely landed anything the whole night. Dirrell on the other hand was landing punches which is part of the clean effective punching criteria. I agree with this. one. i'm not a dirrell fan. i don't like him nor his style. two. i always favor the aggressor over the counter puncher. you can't score a round for a guy because you don't like how his opponent fights. even with all the running and fighting like a bitch , dirrell STILL LANDED MORE and THREW MORE. ...and I agree here again.

lol, but ward wins for clinching against Miranda? I hear ya http://media.thenewstribune.com/smedia/2009/10/17/23/53-Britain_Boxing_Froch_Dirrell.sff.standalone.prod_affiliate.5.jpg one. i'm not a dirrell fan. i don't like him nor his style. two. i always favor the aggressor over the counter puncher. you can't score a round for a guy because you don't like how his opponent fights. even with all the running and fighting like a bitch , dirrell STILL LANDED MORE and THREW MORE. Ive got an affinity for counter punchers. Doubt he landed more. He scrambled around the ring lungeing like a clown for bout 9 rounds. Froch did the better work. I think he coulda won if he stayed with the counter punching i.e last few rounds

one. i'm not a dirrell fan. i don't like him nor his style. two. i always favor the aggressor over the counter puncher. you can't score a round for a guy because you don't like how his opponent fights. even with all the running and fighting like a bitch , dirrell STILL LANDED MORE and THREW MORE. you think they will get that after all these post and borads explaining why direll should had won.....guess boxing anit about clean effective punches and more about aggression, im starting to wonder if some of these guys are MMA fans

The funny thing is when he stood and faced Froch in round 11 he beat him easily with his speed and skills, the others rounds he didn't win clearly at all. I can't believe Americans of all people are defending the way Dirrel fought and saying he won easily. Fights aren't just scored on who lands more anyway, Froch was chasing him down all night. Coming forward isn't part of the scoring criteria. What is part of the scoring criteria is effective agression and for his agression to be effective, he would of been landing punches but, he barely landed anything the whole night. Dirrell on the other hand was landing punches which is part of the clean effective punching criteria.

he needs to work on his running. if he's wary of his chin , trying to avoid long exchanges is fine but he needs to do it so it doesn't look so bad. he looks so awkward and so scared. one can be defensive but still look comfortable and confident. most of these judges don't know shit. they're as stupid as the fans on here in judging fights. the way dirrell moves losses him points. I like this post. Dirrell just doesn't look dominant. Froch was the aggressor but he looked like the more dominant fighter, he looked more like the man in that ring even when he was getting tagged. Dirrell looks like he is losing at times, when it is completely unnecessary. A judge would just see Dirrell back-peddling looking worried and Froch moving forward posturing. A punch hasn't been thrown, but visually that just looks like Froch is winning. I'm not that sure Dirrell would have got the nod in America either.

lol, but ward wins for clinching against Miranda? I hear ya http://media.thenewstribune.com/smedia/2009/10/17/23/53-Britain_Boxing_Froch_Dirrell.sff.standalone.prod_affiliate.5.jpg Ward boxed- Dirrell did not, all he did was get lucky a handful of times lungeing. Theres clinching and there is clinching

Wash ure mouth with detergent lick my penis:kiss:

say's the nigguah with mayweather in his sig Wash ure mouth with detergent

U must be mad. What boxing did Dirrell show? What counter-punching did he show. He grabbed excessively. Boxing is not scored by running around the ring fella. http://media.thenewstribune.com/smedia/2009/10/17/23/53-Britain_Boxing_Froch_Dirrell.sff.standalone.prod_affiliate.5.jpg :notworthy I see the reason behind your comments now, you are from the UK!!!!

U must be mad. What boxing did Dirrell show? What counter-punching did he show. He grabbed excessively. Boxing is not scored by running around the ring fella. say's the nigguah with mayweather in his sig

he needs to work on his running. if he's wary of his chin , trying to avoid long exchanges is fine but he needs to do it so it doesn't look so bad. he looks so awkward and so scared. one can be defensive but still look comfortable and confident. most of these judges don't know shit. they're as stupid as the fans on here in judging fights. the way dirrell moves losses him points. he didn't land more. he didn't even throw more. wtf are you smoking? U must be mad. What boxing did Dirrell show? What counter-punching did he show. He grabbed excessively. Boxing is not scored by running around the ring fella.

Dirrell may of ran and clinched, but he landed more punches and was busier in most of the rounds. All Froch did was fight dirty, practice his judo techniques and hit air. Froch fans seem to think he won because he clinched less.

Clinching does not win rounds. Froch controlled the ring landed more. lol, but ward wins for clinching against Miranda? I hear ya http://media.thenewstribune.com/smedia/2009/10/17/23/53-Britain_Boxing_Froch_Dirrell.sff.standalone.prod_affiliate.5.jpg

Clinching does not win rounds. Froch controlled the ring landed more. Froch landed more punches? I can't even discuss this fight anymore. I guess I just saw things differently.

Clinching does not win rounds. Froch controlled the ring landed more. Landed more? Hitting air doesn't count bro.

Back pedalling, crying to the referee, excessive clinching and failing to engage in any meaningful exchanges..... I'm very disapointed with Dirrell. I was really hoping he would 'BRING IT' but he did anything but. Only Sven Ottke can pull it off. And Mayweather is ok for back peddling? And Cotto too? How come Cintron gets to cry to the ref and get draws when he even gets ko'd but Dirrell can out land Froch 3-1 in punches and get hit in the back of the head and body slammed and lose for it? Froch was missing the entire night, look at the look of shock on his face when they announce him as the winner. :smashfrea

if we're lucky he'll change his style and try to be more offensive. that'll be a good thing. He really just needs to stand his ground a little bit more. His punch output seems fine to me. He looks really weak though, maybe he moves a lot for a reason. He fell every time Froch touched him.