Are my numbers right??? (mosley/cotto final punchstats)

Punch stats mean shit and you know it. punch stats are much more objective and unbiased than the any cotto stan's score.. Shane did fight well, Miguel was just the better man...slightly. Shane didn't just fight well, he won the fight Unlike the Clottey fight where at the end I felt like Cotto was the beaten man (although the cut was a factor). cotto beat clottey.... the reason why you felt like cotto lost was because of the cut and because of the margo aftermath. Even if you go round by round, punch stats are also objective, better objective than subjective and like I said before Shanes jab is only a measuring stick. It inflicts no damage on his opponent. Cotto's jab cause damage, enhances swelling, catches the judges eye. yes, cotto's jab is better than mosley's, but mosley landed more power punches and power punches > jabs.

take from http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/view.php?pg=miguel_cotto_shane_mosley_final seriously, I think mosley won the fight and it wasn't as close as I thought... anyone see if I messed up on any of the calculations? :lol1: :lol1:......you the man my dude!!! :notworthy

c'mon man... just look at the punch stats... => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6287136&postcount=79 there's no way cotto won this fight.... Punch stats mean shit and you know it. Shane did fight well, Miguel was just the better man...slightly. Unlike the Clottey fight where at the end I felt like Cotto was the beaten man (although the cut was a factor). Even if you go round by round, punch stats are also objective, and like I said before Shanes jab is only a measuring stick. It inflicts no damage on his opponent. Cotto's jab cause damage, enhances swelling, catches the judges eye.

You're numbers are right. thanks... finallly someone checked them... That doesn't mean Mosley beat Cotto. sure it does and even if it doesn't it definitely supports it Mosley said he lost and admitted. Fighters never admit that they lose and Mosley was honest and said he didn't do enough. gimme a link where the words "i lost" actually come out of his mouth. please prove me wrong. Cotto won, plain and simple. cotto didn't win. mosley got robbed. It was from 2007. true, we can't go back and change the robbery, but atleast we can acknowledge that it was a robbery. and even if you lie to yourself and don't acknowledge the robbery, you should atleast have the decency to say that mosley deserved the rematch all along.

It has everything to do with it. I shouldn't have to explain any more. Cotto wasn't hurt. That was all HBO getting caught up in the moment. Cotto decided to box for reasons I don't know. He just decided to do it in the 9th round. It wasn't a single punch or anything. All I know is he won the rounds he "ran" in. Only lost the 10th because of two good punches. The ones that "hurt" Cotto according to everyone. c'mon man... just look at the punch stats... => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6287136&postcount=79 there's no way cotto won this fight....

You're numbers are right. That doesn't mean Mosley beat Cotto. Mosley said he lost and admitted. Fighters never admit that they lose and Mosley was honest and said he didn't do enough. Cotto won, plain and simple. It was from 2007.

What does that have to do with the fact that Shane landed more power punches and was never hurt in the fight like Cotto was? Oh, and the body punches don't get accounted for either. I guess this is olympic boxing. Cotto's ass went on the run because Shane was getting to his body. Not only did Cotto get beat. He got beat at his own game and a blue print was laid out on how to deal with Cotto. Margarito followed this accordingly loaded gloves or not. It has everything to do with it. I shouldn't have to explain any more. Cotto wasn't hurt. That was all HBO getting caught up in the moment. Cotto decided to box for reasons I don't know. He just decided to do it in the 9th round. It wasn't a single punch or anything. All I know is he won the rounds he "ran" in. Only lost the 10th because of two good punches. The ones that "hurt" Cotto according to everyone.

If you honestly think you have done anything in this thread except tarnish your pretty good reputation as a poster....you really have lost your rabbit. look at the stats and tell me i'm wrong??? => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6287136&postcount=79 I didn't post the stats... a cotto stan did. this is the bitter fruit of that cotto stan's action... There's no crying in boxing my man theres no room for it with all the other b.s. going on so you go head and stamp on my man and I'll catch you after you stamp yourself tongueless or develop carpel tunnel. GOOD NIGHT!!! I'm not crying about anything.... I'm gloating. will the cotto stan that gave me the punch stat please stand up?

they are more objective than any cotto stan. cause its fun to make cotto stans cry did, am, and will. stamping out ignorance, arrogance and stupidity is always fruitful see the link for details => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6287136&postcount=79 There's no crying in boxing my man theres no room for it with all the other b.s. going on so you go head and stamp on my man and I'll catch you after you stamp yourself tongueless or develop carpel tunnel. GOOD NIGHT!!!

Punch stats are deceiving as well as inaccurate. You know this. they are more objective than any cotto stan. Why do you continue down this road that leads to nowhere. cause its fun to make cotto stans cry You need to ask yourself why is Maywether ducking Mosley and continue to scream and holler about that. did, am, and will. This road appears to be more fruitfull for all. stamping out ignorance, arrogance and stupidity is always fruitful see the link for details => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6287136&postcount=79

Well you watched a different fight than I did then. nope same fight You claim one swing round just because of the punchstats yet again. There were many swing rounds. I'm just telling you what the punch stats tell us. You complain about the stans, but you seem to have some sort of deep animosity towards Cotto or his fans. You seem to have some sort of agenda going on, but you expect others to absorb your opinion as if it is gospel. its true, I love making stans cry... but that doesn't detract from the truthfulness of the punch stats.... again, I didn't post them, a cotto stan posted them because he thought it would shut me up, but cotto stans don't understand boxing... they think a jab is a harder punch than a power punch. I'm just telling you guys what the punch stats mean. Every top fighter in here has Stans. Cotto has them, Pacquiao has them, Floyd has them, Williams has them. They all have them. You used to come across as a balanced poster. What in the hell happened to you by claiming a robbery over a close fight? check the link => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6287136&postcount=79 mosley got robbed BOOMbip: Cotto won get over it buddy...Mosley said it..."I think it might have been a draw or maybe Cotto eged it." - Shane Mosley. Pullcounter: Bwahhahahahahah robbery statz bwahahahahaha I crushed the numbers stans...stans, Cotto, Mosley, MSG radio controlled field mice, radar sensitive sugar cubes Bwwahahahahahahaha!!!!! BOOMbip: Dude your fukin' nuts. Pullcounter: Bwhahahahaha Staz staz I have the numbers...leather bound book dividers... winter divided by orange = Tom Berringer....Bwhahahahah don't you see you fools it's all about Numbers...I FEEL SOOOO ALIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BOOMbip: You need jesus boy. Iceta: I love you Pull. bwhahahahahaah!!!!! read this and weep => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6287136&postcount=79

conspiracy??? the stats in the link speak for themselves Punch stats are deceiving as well as inaccurate. You know this. Why do you continue down this road that leads to nowhere. You need to ask yourself why is Maywether ducking Mosley and continue to scream and holler about that. This road appears to be more fruitfull for all.

I didn't post the punch stats... a cotto stan did. I just took what they gave me and crushed them. clean effective punching is the top criteria for winning a fight... and mosley landed more power punches than cotto in the majority of rounds. not bigger than clean effective punching yeah, he threw and landed more jabs, but mosley landed more power punches and he outworked cotto in every round. yep, but mosley laned more hard shots... according to the punchstats, the only swing round was the 12th. stop feeling and start thinking... click the link and get informed => http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6287136&postcount=79 mosley felt like he got robbed yeah, but it wasn't and mosley got robbed. Well you watched a different fight than I did then. You claim one swing round just because of the punchstats yet again. There were many swing rounds. You complain about the stans, but you seem to have some sort of deep animosity towards Cotto or his fans. You seem to have some sort of agenda going on, but you expect others to absorb your opinion as if it is gospel. Every top fighter in here has Stans. Cotto has them, Pacquiao has them, Floyd has them, Williams has them. They all have them. You used to come across as a balanced poster. What in the hell happened to you by claiming a robbery over a close fight?

O.K. you win outside of MSG but Mosely won't even sniff the 12th round next time around. Don't need anymore conspiracy threads!!! conspiracy??? the stats in the link speak for themselves

watever... as long as mosley gets his rematch outside of MSG. O.K. you win outside of MSG but Mosely won't even sniff the 12th round next time around. Don't need anymore conspiracy threads!!!

We both know he's a w.w. After Pac who is he going to fight hence REMATCHES and profitable ones they be!!! watever... as long as mosley gets his rematch outside of MSG.

i dunno why cotto doesn't fight rematches, but he doesn't... hence duckage. We both know he's a w.w. After Pac who is he going to fight hence REMATCHES and profitable ones they be!!!

Cotto never fights rematches because Arum had him chasing pots of gold over the rainbow. Well Pac is one pot. Mayweather wont risk it so all that is left are rematches! i dunno why cotto doesn't fight rematches, but he doesn't... hence duckage.

cotto never fights rematches, especially rematches that are warranted, like the mosley rematch! cotto/pac will be a good fight while it lasts... cotto better end the fight in 6, or he will gas and get beat up. Cotto never fights rematches because Arum had him chasing pots of gold over the rainbow. Well Pac is one pot. Mayweather wont risk it so all that is left are rematches!

O.K. I checked your link nothings changed! Cotto has never ducked any fight. Rematches included! This brain child of Arum's { Pac/Cotto} has been in the making for quite some time. Enjoy the fight we'll talk rematch after Cotto takes care of buisness. I know theres a weight disparity but its still intriguing!!! cotto never fights rematches, especially rematches that are warranted, like the mosley rematch! cotto/pac will be a good fight while it lasts... cotto better end the fight in 6, or he will gas and get beat up.