Is Pacs welterweight resume better than Floyds?

.........bump

Hell no he fights zombies that aren't even a shell of themselves and only fights certain styles, everybody cherry picks and that includes Pac. He faces guys that lack defense and walk straight in...Plus he's never fought a black fighter from the US with boxing skills. His resume is fabricated. So you're saying he never took a risk by fighting Oscar? That fight was supposed to be a mismatch. It ended up being exactly that, only the other way round. Nobody knew it would turn out that way. Roach and Pacquiao took a gamble that happened to pay off. The rest of your post is too ridiculous to comment on. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

well cotto himself has a better resumee at welterweight than pacquiao and mayweather. so if pacquiao beats cotto which i dont see happening, yea that places him with a better ww resumee and i think even makes him the favorite to win if he beats cotto by ko. Maybe, but Cotto never beat a lineal champion and has only fought for vacant titles.

well cotto himself has a better resumee at welterweight than pacquiao and mayweather. so if pacquiao beats cotto which i dont see happening, yea that places him with a better ww resumee and i think even makes him the favorite to win if he beats cotto by ko.

Most people are going to look at PRESENT day other than PAST and PRESENT, which makes this thread kind of irrelevant. You're crazy. Pac is a top 10 all time great. If he beats Cotto his welterweight resume easily blows Floyds out of the water.

they must have been better at the time because they held the titles... Most people are going to look at PRESENT day other than PAST and PRESENT, which makes this thread kind of irrelevant.

so youre tellins us zab, baldomir, JMM are better welterweights than Cotto? they must have been better at the time because they held the titles...

Absolutely not, crazy question.

Yup thats about it. End of Thread Lets look at it a little more closely though. You really can't dismiss Baldomir. He was the lineal champ, and Zab before him. Floyd beat both those guys.

Well.... Cotto > Judah, Marquez, Baldomir and Hatton Less quantity.... higher quality. Take your pick. Yup thats about it. End of Thread

hahaha Thanks man.:lol1: You can Green K me, I see that rep :rofl:

Lets assume Pac beats Cotto. Would he have a better welterweight resume than Floyd based on this fight and the DLH fight? Bait thread cotto is better than any WW that floyd has fought thus far... but you can make a weak argument for floyd based on theoretical and hypothetical situations.

You don't have to pay me. Just wanted to see if you remember, you can have it :D hahaha Thanks man.:lol1:

I'll pay you bro. I knew Floyd was gonna win. Just wanted to bet on JMM just to jinxed him and it worked. Just wanted to say that also. lol You don't have to pay me. Just wanted to see if you remember, you can have it :D

Mitchell outweighed Mayweather by 9 lbs. Just wanted to say that. By the way, you gonna pay me my 45K? I'll pay you bro. I knew Floyd was gonna win. Just wanted to bet on JMM just to jinx him and it worked. Just wanted to say that also. lol

1)Judah and Mitchell both weighed in at 145 against Floyd. 2) Cotto will be 160 on fight night. 3)Cotto>>>>Mitchel,Judah,Baldo Mitchell outweighed Mayweather by 9 lbs. Just wanted to say that. By the way, you gonna pay me my 45K?

1)Judah and Mitchell both weighed in at 145 against Floyd. 2) Cotto will be 160 on fight night. 3)Cotto>>>>Mitchel,Judah,Baldo Praise the Lord!!!

Even if he beats Cotto he doesnt get full credit because the fight is at 145, Roach is counting on those 2 pounds to insure victory, otherwise he would allow Cotto to come in the fight at his best which is a full, healthy 147. 1)Judah and Mitchell both weighed in at 145 against Floyd. 2) Cotto will be 160 on fight night. 3)Cotto>>>>Mitchel,Judah,Baldo

Youre a funny dude. What is so funny about that? You don't agree?

Yes! Cotto>>>Baldo,Judah,Mitchell