Bernard Hopkins hasn't fought since he beat Kelly Pavlik, and is looking for an opponent. Most boxing experts say he will either face Chad Dawson or Adamek. I think Bernard Hopkins against either Dawson or Adamek would be interesting, and great from a fan's perspective; but I'll tell you, I would really like to see Bernard Hopkins swallow his pride and face Roy Jones Jr.
Roy Jones Jr. isn't what he used to be, but isn't shot either; he still possesses speed and decent power. And since reformatting his boxing stance/style, and implementing basic boxing fundamentals into his game, he's a different Roy Jones Jr.
Jones has recently went on record and publicly stated he would be interested in facing Bernard Hopkins. This is a fight most boxing fans would like to see, and I feel Hopkins would garner more interest from the boxing world were he to sign a contract to face Roy Jones Jr. than he would taking on Dawson or Adamek.
Roy Jones Jr. Vs. Bernard Hopkins; repeat or revenge. After all these years, it has a certain ring to it.
I think Roy would beat Hopkins, even today.
i don't give adamek much chance against hopkins....it would be another slow plodding guy like pavlik...hopkins would look like a cruiserweight fmj...i'm pulling for dawson...i think dawson would get in dat ass better than calzaghe did...
well, adamek is a lot bigger than pavlik.
Same here. The reason Jones (other than being a big pay day) wants this fight, is because he knows it would generate a lot of interest - especially with these two guys' mouths, LOL. Jones should suck it up; if that's what it takes for this fight to happen, and he wants to give the fans something to see, take the 60/40. It would be 40/40 in the end anyhow, because Jones promotes himself, and after Goldenboy gets their cut.........
Dawson or Adamek still aren't household names like RJJ. Bernard is crazy if he thinks he can make more money from those two than RJJ.
i don't give adamek much chance against hopkins....it would be another slow plodding guy like pavlik...hopkins would look like a cruiserweight fmj...i'm pulling for dawson...i think dawson would get in dat ass better than calzaghe did...
i agree...i think Roy should bite the bullet..and get pissed off so RJ can appear
i think jones taking 40% from nardo when he knows its more like 25% would be like selling his soul to golden boy...
i agree...i think Roy should bite the bullet..and get pissed off so RJ can appear
Same here. The reason Jones (other than being a big pay day) wants this fight, is because he knows it would generate a lot of interest - especially with these two guys' mouths, LOL. Jones should suck it up; if that's what it takes for this fight to happen, and he wants to give the fans something to see, take the 60/40. It would be 40/40 in the end anyhow, because Jones promotes himself, and after Goldenboy gets their cut.........
Dawson or Adamek still aren't household names like RJJ. Bernard is crazy if he thinks he can make more money from those two than RJJ.
antonio tarver.....the first guy to KO roy, and beat him 2 out of 3, and some ppl say all 3 times they fought.
1 fighter tarver...1 legit lightheavyweight hopkins has beat tarver...now how long ago has that been and how many catchweight fights has hopkins made since that 1 tarver win...don't forget to throw in the calzaghe loss...lol
Tarver will only be known for that punch....unfortunately that one punch wont get him on the ATG list or in the boxing hall of fame
:drive: < Rjj on the road to the Hall of Fame and ATG status
Someone tell Roy to take the damn 60/40. If he's confident he can beat Bernard, take it, and then whoop him!
i don't rjj could KO any of those guys
Then you're just a delusional Hopkins ballswinger who hopes for the death of Roy Jones.
At least that's what I gather..... :rolleyes:
dunno, but bhop is offering rjj the same offer rjj gave bhop. pay back is a bitch.... what goes around comes around... etc...
that's why bhop ain't fighting RJJ for 40/60.
yep, RJJ needs to accept the same offer he gave to BHop when RJJ was on top.
doubt it...jones states anytime someone sticks a mic in his face the same thing...that nard and golden boy are offering 60-40 with a 25% tribute to oscar....plus they want to dictate all of the terms....it would be more like 75-25 after golden boy finishes raping him...thats nothing but greed and ego
Thats your theory. I don't have to go by it.
And Bernard can fight those two make less money or fight Roy and make more money.
you don't HAVE to go by it.....that's why you're wondering WHY hopkins wants a bigger cut right now...
all i did was answer your question...you don't follow logic, then you end up making statements like "hopkins is on crack, if he thinks he should make more than rjj."
all i did was tell you why he should, and you best believe, if the fight gets made, it'll be b/c hopkins indeed DID get a bigger cut....if not, roy fights danny green.
Seriously, the Roy Jones bashing is out of hand. Sane fans know he is not the same fighter, he probably loses to Hopkins unless Bernard becomes washed up overnight, and his days as a top level fighter have been over since the Ruiz fight.
The way people talk though, he is and has always been a bum that never fought anyone other than taxi drivers. The ignorance towards his skills and accomplishments is insulting.
When did I make an excuse?
I've said on here several times that Roy was the better man that night.
Straight up ; he had Bernard's number.
But you can't sit there and say that Roy didn't have an edge in experience, even slightly.
Because then you're lying.
Keep it real, and keep it honest.
on the real they had different styles, but were evenly matched in size, talent, etc. they were number 1 and 2 contenders for a middleweight strap, and were both on somewhat of a collision course to meet to see who was the best...jones won the fight because he was the better man...bottom line....its irrelevant if jones even had a slight edge in experience...so please don't try to make it seem like jones had twice as many pro fights as nard or some garbage ass excuse that somebody who wasn't even born or never watch a boxing match in the 90's starts repeating....
now if you want a good example of somebody being green, pop in nard vs. taylor 1 and 2. we all know how those turned out....
What am I supposed to do? Defend every single post that Roy fans make?
As of right now the forum is full to the ceiling with Roy bashing in at least 7 different active threads...
So ta ta
I wasn't asking you to defend anything, son.
You were taking a jab at Hopkins fans who make excuses when Bernard has a close loss.
So I took a jab at Roy fans who made excuses when Roy got his lights turned out.
Just pointing out that it works both ways.
You don't have to "defend" anything.
This is a 50/50 fight purse wise.
then RJJ shouldn't even be bothering bhop.
Bernard is on crack if he thinks he should be making more than Roy.
why would RJJ wanna fight a crack head for?
Roy is beloved, Bernard is not.
Hops is relevant, RJJ is not.
Except by evil people like street bully.
and most boxing fans.
so why didn't nard take the 40% jones offered when jones was on top and put that overinflated ego of his in check...
dunno, but bhop is offering rjj the same offer rjj gave bhop. pay back is a bitch.... what goes around comes around... etc...
outside of that heist job him and de la hoya pulled a couple of years ago, he would have cashed a bigger check than he did fighting eastman, robert allen 24, and that barnburner with morrade hakkar...
that's why bhop ain't fighting RJJ for 40/60.
works both ways b
yep, RJJ needs to accept the same offer he gave to BHop when RJJ was on top.
Ok then.....
What about Roy's fan excuses that tarver landed a "lucky punch"? :lol1:
I've seen that one thrown around here in NSB more times than I can count.
What am I supposed to do? Defend every single post that Roy fans make?
As of right now the forum is full to the ceiling with Roy bashing in at least 7 different active threads...
So ta ta
Roy "Houdini" Jones jr. You guys fell for his magic trick again huh?
pretty much.....just like after the trinidad fight, when everyone thought he had a chance of beating calzaghe....
60/40 in bhop's favor and the fight can be made. it's RJJ that has to swallow pride.
RJJ is shot. beating up Lacy is meaningless.
there's nothing for bhop to gain from beating up a shot RJJ unless bhop is getting 60% of the purse.
yes it does, but RJJ has to give into 40/60.
wow... just wow.
that's all it bruh.....
hopkins according to his haters...and even that win on hopkins carries the excuse from hopkins lovers that hopkins was green....
now tell me the last lightheavyweight that had some talent hopkins beat...natural lightheavy...not one of those catchweight fights where the opponent had to move up two divisions and put quarters in his drawers to make weight...
antonio tarver.....the first guy to KO roy, and beat him 2 out of 3, and some ppl say all 3 times they fought.
But Roy fans are the only delussional fans.
only delusional if yout think roy can still beat A class fighters....
This is a 50/50 fight purse wise.
Bernard is on crack if he thinks he should be making more than Roy.
Roy is beloved, Bernard is not.
Except by evil people like street bully.
go by the "what have you done lately" theory, and go by the fact this fight is needed and wanted moreso by jones than hopkins, and you get your answer....
hopkins can fight dawson or adamek, roy jones gets danny green.... :lol1:
Two different worlds completely... im talking about BERNARD FAN EXCUSES... and your talking about ROYS bullshit reasoning.
Ok then.....
What about Roy's fan excuses that tarver landed a "lucky punch"? :lol1:
I've seen that one thrown around here in NSB more times than I can count.
so why didn't nard take the 40% jones offered when jones was on top and put that overinflated ego of his in check...outside of that heist job him and de la hoya pulled a couple of years ago, he would have cashed a bigger check than he did fighting eastman, robert allen 24, and that barnburner with morrade hakkar...works both ways b
Indeed it does work both ways.
I'm just pointing out that both of them are stubborn here.
Hopkins should've accepted the 40% 8 years ago because Roy was the star and already had a victory over him.
No 2 ways about it.
But now Roy is the one who needs to accept 40% to make it happen because Hopkins is more highly regarded, he's P4P#3, and he's 3-1 against Tarver, Wright, Calzaghe, and Pavlik ; elite fighters, not B and C level guys like Sheika and Lacy.
I wouldn't go that far.
But on the note of Hopkins losses what you touched on earlier about his fans not accepting his losses....
Roy lost to Tarver because he didn't want his dad to get the credit.
Roy lost to Calzaghe because his corner couldn't fix his cut.
Two different worlds completely... im talking about BERNARD FAN EXCUSES... and your talking about ROYS bullshit reasoning.