http://www.*b*o*x*i*n*g*n*e*w*s*2*4*.com/2009/01/is-margarito-the-best-welterweight-when-not-being-clinched/
Read the all shit, it's what i called biased journalism, WTF is that? I would fire the dude who wrote that.
The punk said that Margarito could have beaten Mosley without the clinches.
lol.the fanboys, yo.
dude's "OFFENSE" was missing its biggest component that day.they go toe to toe measley ko's him.this shit did not go a full twelve.stop making it seem like it did.
aha by that im supposing you mean the plaster right...well im no fan boy man im just being realistic. Margarito has already said hes comin back for mosley. well see how this plays out.
margarito would have beaten mosley without the clinches. the dude is younger and a lot bigger. when you fight an opponent with advanteges like that, yo gotta fight a smart fight. the clinches and pulling back were part of a perfect strategy to dismantle margaritos offense. That being said there are many ways to beat a boxer as long as you plan them out pefectly.
You make it sound as if these two dudes stood toe to toe and traded until one fell it would be margarito. Nah dude theirs no way.
lol.the fanboys, yo.
dude's "OFFENSE" was missing its biggest component that day.they go toe to toe measley ko's him.this shit did not go a full twelve.stop making it seem like it did.
As a Margarito fan, i've been saying for awhile now that the key to beating Margarito is the clinch. I think there was more to the Mosely fight than just the clinch but I do believe that it was the main reason he lost that fight.
margarito would have beaten mosley without the clinches. the dude is younger and a lot bigger. when you fight an opponent with advanteges like that, yo gotta fight a smart fight. the clinches and pulling back were part of a perfect strategy to dismantle margaritos offense. That being said there are many ways to beat a boxer as long as you plan them out pefectly.
You make it sound as if these two dudes stood toe to toe and traded until one fell it would be margarito. Nah dude theirs no way.
http://www.*b*o*x*i*n*g*n*e*w*s*2*4*.com/2009/01/is-margarito-the-best-welterweight-when-not-being-clinched/
Read the all shit, it's what i called biased journalism, WTF is that? I would fire the dude who wrote that.
The punk said that Margarito could have beaten Mosley without the clinches.
lol , i just saw the title of this thread and before i even clicked on it i knew which website the article would come from ! that site is a joke and shouldnt be taken seriously by anyone ....... just a lot of bias and hate there.
http://www.************.com/2009/01/is-margarito-the-best-welterweight-when-not-being-clinched/
Read the all shit, it's what i called biased journalism, WTF is that? I would fire the dude who wrote that.
The punk said that Margarito could have beaten Mosley without the clinches.
LOL.as if clinches aren't a part of boxing.what is he with out his loaded gloves?a punching bag.
16y ago
(LMAO)Article says Margarito is better than Mosley | BoxingScene Community