I would say 90 percent of you on here think froch is a very unskillful fighter. All they give him credit for on here is good chin and heavy hands....
Well im going to make a bold statment and say froch will go down undefeated and one of the greats...
i followed the guys career alot better thna most of you and i think he will go down as a great because none of you have seen the real froch.
The guy was a very good amature, most amatures once turning professional know they have boxing skills, but the things they may lack is chin, power and staminia.
So froch has all of those things.
If you watch his fights when he actually listens to his corner and uses his brain his jab is relentless, he then rareley gets tagged and follwos on with his deadly right hand aka the fina roud o the taylor fight. if you watch that final roud talor did not gas out thats an urban myth, he got hit with a solid right hand which gassed him out. You could be lance armstrong with apulse of 3 a minute, but you getting hit with a froch right hand and it gasses you out.
Jean pascal is a brilliant brilliant fighter, who froch beat fairly and quarely. BTW froch had a fractured ribin that fight, in the taylor fight he had an infected eye so basically he was blind.
Froch is a class fighter whos beaten very good european fighters as well, including brian magee(who was going to face calzache as a mandatory.) robin reid(froch admitted he was past his best but still stopped him), charles admumu, ....
Froch weakness is his arrogance, he honestly likes getting hitimo, because we all know including him whos admitted it, he gets exciting but unessessary wars when if he used his jab from word go would demilish taylor and pascal.
Im looking foreward to the hate but people have been predicting fronch to lose long before taylor and pascal....in fact msany though brian magee would end his carrer.
JIm watt said he would never be wold champion, well guess what he is,...
you cannot cut nottingham people...now bring on the hate....
look mate, you got well and truely schooled by me, and you appear to be seething in process.
Ive literally never lost a debate on this forum, and destroyed some of the so called legends on here. I even converted squel piggy to christianity.
Take some time out, find a girl. Settle down, or even marry. Losing to me in a One sided debat is not the be all or end all. Hopefully you will learn from this experience and come back a better person and human being.
Cheers and good luck mate.
What a moron you are. This forum is obviously very important to you, probably the most important thing in your life.
Your a very sad individual.
Schooled me? I must admit I did chuckle at that.
Your a forum vermin who trolls arguments, please die.
Your a very immature person and the sort of person with t no manners, class or maturity.
If you don't agree with some one like others on here you debate, have exchanges and speak like an adult.
Your obviously someone who doesn't like any opinion other than your own and you cant deal with it like a adult, resorting to pathetic little insults and insipid remarks.
Thankfully, this forum doesn't seem to have too many retarded people who spend all day on a cheap desktop brought from pimping out their grandmothers arse.
look mate, you got well and truely schooled by me, and you appear to be seething in process.
Ive literally never lost a debate on this forum, and destroyed some of the so called legends on here. I even converted squel piggy to christianity.
Take some time out, find a girl. Settle down, or even marry. Losing to me in a One sided debat is not the be all or end all. Hopefully you will learn from this experience and come back a better person and human being.
Cheers and good luck mate.
mate the guys going mental and is a lost cause.
He thinks falling over, illegal ducking, holding and running is part of boxing.
Hnece why i told him to leave the boxing community because hes a terrible poster, with probably a terrible social life.
God help his soul....
Your a very immature person and the sort of person with t no manners, class or maturity.
If you don't agree with some one like others on here you debate, have exchanges and speak like an adult.
Your obviously someone who doesn't like any opinion other than your own and you cant deal with it like a adult, resorting to pathetic little insults and insipid remarks.
Thankfully, this forum doesn't seem to have too many retarded people who spend all day on a cheap desktop brought from pimping out their grandmothers arse.
ahahahah fair play.
either way, he does good videos.
They're ok but i have read better analysis and predictions from posters on this site.
The guy says he has been watching boxing for 30 years and has a vast amatuer background and has sparred with pro's etc. I have not seen one video of him sparring let alone fighting. You might get the odd video of him posing in a tank top with boxing gloves on hitting a bag with sloppy punches but thats it. You're telling me all those years of boxing and he didn't film one of his fights?
The guy just gets stats from boxrec and copies posts he has seen on forums and passes them off as his own opinions. I can't believe nobody else can see through this guy.
Check his upload history. He has only been uploading boxing predictions for the last 2 years and has had his account since 2006! He was uploading UFC videos long before he uploaded any boxing ones. The guy has been a boxing fan for 2-3 years tops.
ahahahah fair play.
either way, he does good videos.
i think on thle the dude predictions are bang on. Sure he will get some really wrong, but thats like anything. Hes no prophet. But id say hes more right than wrong.
Although i form my own opinion when betting, i certainly consult his predictions to open my mind...
The guy just gets stats from boxrec and copies posts he has seen on forums and passes them off as his own opinions. I can't believe nobody else can see through this guy.
Check his upload history. He has only been uploading boxing predictions for the last 2 years and has had his account since 2006! He was uploading UFC videos long before he uploaded any boxing ones. The guy has been a boxing fan for 2-3 years tops.
I don't disagree with what you said but why do people act like that bigragu guy is the be all and end all of boxing? He just an average fan like you and me giving his opinion.
I just just hate how people hang on to his every word like he is the grand wizard of boxing. Some of his predictions analysis have been way off the mark.
i think on thle the dude predictions are bang on. Sure he will get some really wrong, but thats like anything. Hes no prophet. But id say hes more right than wrong.
Although i form my own opinion when betting, i certainly consult his predictions to open my mind...
thats a oor anaysis.
Dirrell was illegally ducking his head, watch the bigragu yotubr assessment 0f the fight(hes american asnd scored 2 rounds to froch). He discussed dirrells illegal ducking.
When you duck you do not show the back of your head, dirrell kept showing the back of your head, deliberately to stink the place out. Luckily froch is a beast and just kept hitting what dirrell showed(the back of his head).
As for dirrell landing the better punches, thats baloney, dirrell got cloked in the 3, and 8 round by the best shots.
For all his running, his face was bleeding and froch was unscathed.
Dirrells best round was round 10 and rightfully was deducted a point for holding, so his best round wa a draw.
Dirrell in the interview after admitted froch won round 12.
If you thyink dirrell won that fight, you should not be involved with boxing, please dont post again.
I don't disagree with what you said but why do people act like that bigragu guy is the be all and end all of boxing? He just an average fan like you and me giving his opinion.
I just just hate how people hang on to his every word like he is the grand wizard of boxing. Some of his predictions analysis have been way off the mark.
mate the guys going mental and is a lost cause.
He thinks falling over, illegal ducking, holding and running is part of boxing.
Hnece why i told him to leave the boxing community because hes a terrible poster, with probably a terrible social life.
God help his soul....
LMFAO...God help his soul,classic line...
The more effective punches came from Froch early in the fight imo..Busted Dirrell's nose open he did not stop bleeding all night..I would not call what Dirrell did footwork,it was running flat out..He did not use his feet to set up shots..He used his feet to get away..IMO hustle was a slight edge to Froch being the fact he chased Dirrell all night..
mate the guys going mental and is a lost cause.
He thinks falling over, illegal ducking, holding and running is part of boxing.
Hnece why i told him to leave the boxing community because hes a terrible poster, with probably a terrible social life.
God help his soul....
Again with numbers and stats, I call a fight on what I see. The better quality shots were with Dirrell. The better defense was with Dirrell. The better foot work was with Dirrell. The better hustle was with Dirrell.
Numbers, percentages and judges rarely tell a true tale in boxing.
The more effective punches came from Froch early in the fight imo..Busted Dirrell's nose open he did not stop bleeding all night..I would not call what Dirrell did footwork,it was running flat out..He did not use his feet to set up shots..He used his feet to get away..IMO hustle was a slight edge to Froch being the fact he chased Dirrell all night..
Your the perfect example of someone who only watches one person in a fight.
Froch was outboxed by miles and the only thing that made it 'close' was the fact that Dirrell was holding was so much which made him seem negative,
when he wasn't slipping punches and landing on Froch that is.
Just because you probably live in a rat infested 1 bedroom council sh1tehole doesn't mean everybody does mate, grow up and learn some manners.
He got hit more, was outslicked and his face at the end of the fight said it all, you know, I know and the rat with aids under your bed knows, he thought he was done for.
All you keep going on about is the experts said this, the experts said that, use your own opinions, its not that hard. And look at his face, compared with his face etc etc etc.
Watch the fight again, clean your very small dirty room and come back when you are sober.
I've watch this fight a few times and every time I see Froch winning it..Not so much because of what he did in the ring,but what Dirrell did in the ring..
You have effective boxing and then you have flat out avoiding..Dirrell avoided Froch and did everthing in his power to not engage..I don't believe Froch was lucky,I believe Dirrell lost the fight for himself end of story..
If dirrell wasnt slipping punches he was slipping over, ev erytime froch was about to behead the guy, he was either on his arse, running, illegally ducking or excessive holding.
But even with all that froch out landed dirrell as shown by the punch stats..
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1433578
Dirrell was deducted one point in the tenth round for excessive holding.
Blows: Froch 153/475 32%; Dirrell 105/315 33%.
Again with numbers and stats, I call a fight on what I see. The better quality shots were with Dirrell. The better defense was with Dirrell. The better foot work was with Dirrell. The better hustle was with Dirrell.
Numbers, percentages and judges rarely tell a true tale in boxing.
He got hit more, was outslicked and his face at the end of the fight said it all, you know, I know and the rat with aids under your bed knows, he thought he was done for.
.
If dirrell wasnt slipping punches he was slipping over, ev erytime froch was about to behead the guy, he was either on his arse, running, illegally ducking or excessive holding.
But even with all that froch out landed dirrell as shown by the punch stats..
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1433578
Dirrell was deducted one point in the tenth round for excessive holding.
Blows: Froch 153/475 32%; Dirrell 105/315 33%.
leave it mate, ive out debated you, is one thing you think froch lost, but to say hes lucky despite the fact that even if you replaced froch with the press row, he wouold have won by unanim ous decision.
The fact that all the top experts think he won, yet you, some loner in a council house opinion overides everyone elses, whihc equates to froch being lucky???
As i say i suggest you leave this forum and the boxing cumminity altogather until you actually use logic.
Your the perfect example of someone who only watches one person in a fight.
Froch was outboxed by miles and the only thing that made it 'close' was the fact that Dirrell was holding was so much which made him seem negative,
when he wasn't slipping punches and landing on Froch that is.
Just because you probably live in a rat infested 1 bedroom council sh1tehole doesn't mean everybody does mate, grow up and learn some manners.
He got hit more, was outslicked and his face at the end of the fight said it all, you know, I know and the rat with aids under your bed knows, he thought he was done for.
All you keep going on about is the experts said this, the experts said that, use your own opinions, its not that hard. And look at his face, compared with his face etc etc etc.
Watch the fight again, clean your very small dirty room and come back when you are sober.
Not be involved with boxing? How old are you?
leave it mate, ive out debated you, is one thing you think froch lost, but to say hes lucky despite the fact that even if you replaced froch with the press row, he wouold have won by unanim ous decision.
The fact that all the top experts think he won, yet you, some loner in a council house opinion overides everyone elses, whihc equates to froch being lucky???
As i say i suggest you leave this forum and the boxing cumminity altogather until you actually use logic.
thats a oor anaysis.
Dirrell was illegally ducking his head, watch the bigragu yotubr assessment 0f the fight(hes american asnd scored 2 rounds to froch). He discussed dirrells illegal ducking.
When you duck you do not show the back of your head, dirrell kept showing the back of your head, deliberately to stink the place out. Luckily froch is a beast and just kept hitting what dirrell showed(the back of his head).
As for dirrell landing the better punches, thats baloney, dirrell got cloked in the 3, and 8 round by the best shots.
For all his running, his face was bleeding and froch was unscathed.
Dirrells best round was round 10 and rightfully was deducted a point for holding, so his best round wa a draw.
Dirrell in the interview after admitted froch won round 12.
If you thyink dirrell won that fight, you should not be involved with boxing, please dont post again.
Not be involved with boxing? How old are you?