If Cotto loses to Pacquaio, Will he retire???

I wouldn't be surprised if he went and took two years off and even announced his retirement as he seems fragile mentally, but no way he'd never fight again. There is too much money in it. He's too popular.

cotto's style is exciting.. so no he won't retire.. he can make more money with his fan friendly style

Miguel Angel is too young to retire. some fighters age quicker than others ala odh.imo cotto aint been the same fighter after the margacheato fight.

Losing to someone who is a 2:1 favorite is not a disgraceful thing..... I doubt he would retire if he gets beaten. More fights, more Jaguars for Evangelista Cotto to wreck :pat:

do you think cotto will retire if he loses??????????? poll coming I don`t think he should retire. He could still fight PBF, Williams, rematch with Mosley or rematch with pacman at 147. He can still earn about 40M if his body can take it, retire with a life of luxury and pay his uncle 7m in damages just for the heck of it.

read the letters wtf, that's the "nuclear theory" you're talking about!!! LOL I'm trying to bump up the thread give me some time to locate it.

not as entertaining as seeing you avoid all my questions last time i'm gonna ask: shall we end our bet? you never put it in your signature, and i won't bet with a user that's not reputable Don't worry, I'll but it on my sig

torres was a cum his mom forgot to swallow, unlike einstein. :lol1: bwhahahahahahahahahhaa LOL he's something else

If i remember fdotorres mentioned in one of his intellectual posting that einstein is emotional like him.torres was a cum his mom forgot to swallow, unlike einstein. :lol1:

Einstein was a humble man. If i remember fdotorres mentioned in one of his intellectual post that einstein is an emotional person just like him.

Einstein stated on the 20th of September 1952 "My part in producing the atomic bomb consisted in a single act: I signed a letter to Theodore Roosevelt, pressing the need for experiments on a large scale in order to explore the possibilities for the production of an atomic bomb." A. Einstein "On the Abolition of the Threat of War", Ideas and Opinions, Crown, New York, (1954) page 165. A single act of scribbling his name on a piece of paper. Einstein was a humble man.

That's the theory of Relativity. that's the correct term that einstein developed.Is it in the special relativity theory or in the general relativity theor?. Maybe torres can enlighten me. :D

But do you think nuclear theory = atomic theory? What about hydrogen theory? :D LOL fdotorres is a comedian trying to be the next einstein.

nuclear theory = atomic theory = einstein's theory? e=mc^2? That's the theory of Relativity. that's the correct term that einstein developed.

No he's young. Pacquiao's the favorite and #1 p4p. Cotto still has a lot to offer boxing. He'll probably still have his belt anyway. He's too good and too popular. But do you think nuclear theory = atomic theory? What about hydrogen theory? :D

No he's young. Pacquiao's the favorite and #1 p4p. Cotto still has a lot to offer boxing. He'll probably still have his belt anyway. He's too good and too popular.

"nuclear" theory is how people commonly call the atomic theory. thanks to einstein's, the US was able to develop nuclear bombs faster than germany (even though they started their research/development later) that's what i gave him credit for in the original discussion. feel free to look it up through my post history I'll try to bump up the thread that started the "nuclear theory" bull crap. Do you remember the title of the thread? The first posting on the nuclear theory is really very entertaining.

do you think cotto will retire if he loses??????????? poll coming If he loses to the little ninja who could, yes.. Cotto should retire.

"nuclear" theory is how people commonly call the atomic theory. thanks to einstein's, the US was able to develop nuclear bombs faster than germany (even though they started their research/development later) that's what i gave him credit for in the original discussion. feel free to look it up through my post historyBut a nucleus is just a part of the atom so do you agree that nuclear theory being equal to atomic theory is a misnomer? :D

You can't believe everything you read. Not only was Einstein not the first person to introduce the equation E = MC squared, but he never derived it correctly. Also he never believed that atomic energy could be harnessed. The 'nuclear theory' you're probably referring to was a theory first introduced in the 19th century, before Einstein was writing any papers on physics. Here, read all about it: http://www.jewishracism.com/SaintEinsteinChapter16a.pdf the guy who wrote this lists all his sources.I thought you just said not to believe everything you read? I just read you and as per your advise I won't believe, which means that the link you gave maybe true, get it? :D