Nothing against Bradley but this should have been a no contest...thats all I can say..people are letting there hate for campbell make this legit..I'm not bashing Bradley or anything he impressed me tonight..but love campbell or not he deserves a no decision..just my 2 cents
Nate has all the right to "ND" his way out of the fight, and I won't hold it against him because it was clearly due to an accidental headbutt, BUT the pussy ref bit him in the azz, that's all there is to it.
Better luck next time Nate, if there's still a next time...
yes he deserves a no contest but i dont know why he quit. the cut didnt look that bad compared to cottos cut.
I f blood gets behind your eyeball you will go blind. It starts with the blind spots Campbell was talking about. The appearance of the cut has nothing to do with it.
I think some people will never forgive Nate for beating down Diaz. :blackeye:
not to be rasict...but most of the nate campbell threads are made by those of hispanic descent....
Nothing against Bradley but this should have been a no contest...thats all I can say..people are letting there hate for campbell make this legit..I'm not bashing Bradley or anything he impressed me tonight..but love campbell or not he deserves a no decision..just my 2 cents
I think some people will never forgive Nate for beating down Diaz. :blackeye:
i agree. i know this is off topic but can sombody tell me how to pay out points that i owe people
go to the vbPlaza menu and go to donate and put whoever you want to give points to and how many points you want to give
Nothing against Bradley but this should have been a no contest...thats all I can say..people are letting there hate for campbell make this legit..I'm not bashing Bradley or anything he impressed me tonight..but love campbell or not he deserves a no decision..just my 2 cents
aggre...people leting their hate for nate get the better of them and see that it should be ruled a no contest regardless of the situation
In the post fight commentary they said the doctor saw blood behind his eye, meaning he might have torn his retina, which is consistent with him seeing spots.
It doesn't really have anything to do with the cut, it has to do with Nate not being able to see due to the effects of a headbutt.
Exactly. The ref was a coward and was afraid to make the right call. I think Nate was losing the fight but you can't give him a loss for what happened tonight. If he is seeing spots then the fight has to be stopped.
yes he deserves a no contest but i dont know why he quit. the cut didnt look that bad compared to cottos cut.
He quit because he knew he couldn't win.That's why he quit cause the ref said it was a head butt and should be a no contest.I think the wbo will call for a rematch.
He shouldn't have relied on that cut for a no contest, though. Really, the cut wasn't SO bad. Sure, a cut is never a good thing. Let's face it, he wasn't winning that fight. Yes, it should have been a no contest if he couldn't see. Something tells me he could, though.
We'll never know if he could see or not...and he was probably gonna lose the fight.Bradley was at the top of his game and made nate look slow in the early rounds but............I think nate through too much much of a fit after the fight to say he was lying about not seeing....but who knows just trying to be rationale here..props to bradley he was on his way to a victory it looked like no hate here for bradley..
yes he deserves a no contest but i dont know why he quit. the cut didnt look that bad compared to cottos cut.
In the post fight commentary they said the doctor saw blood behind his eye, meaning he might have torn his retina, which is consistent with him seeing spots.
It doesn't really have anything to do with the cut, it has to do with Nate not being able to see due to the effects of a headbutt.
if there's something to question here its not the headbutt nor the ref's decision but Nate's HEART as a warrior
BLAOW!!!!!!!!!
People make mistakes!..Campbell is always leaning in with his head too..Bradley was fighting..and the ref MADE A MISTAKE!..
but Campbell wanted a way out..plain and simple..
yes he deserves a no contest but i dont know why he quit. the cut didnt look that bad compared to cottos cut.
Agreed. I don't feel bad for Campbell one bit. It's up to the doctor to take a look at the cut and stop the fight, not Campbell. It didn't look that bad, and the bleeding was already taken care of when the fight got stopped.
Campbell simply knew that he was on his way to lose the fight and tried to escape with the 4-round-no-contest loop hole. Knowing he doesn't get many chances against top fighters, I expected more out of him.
He shouldn't have relied on that cut for a no contest, though. Really, the cut wasn't SO bad. Sure, a cut is never a good thing. Let's face it, he wasn't winning that fight. Yes, it should have been a no contest if he couldn't see. Something tells me he could, though.