What's with all the BS about pac not fighting a black guy?

I find it shocking that people are trying to discredit pac by saying he's not fought black fighters. It's so pathetic it's not even worth debating. :bs2:

junior jones wasnt around when MP entered the scene... gairy st. clair though is black, aint american... baloyi, fana & klassen too... yeah... there aint american black fighter of note when MP entered the fray... GREAT!! black American fighters we are talkin about, none of those guys are great fighters and you have to be a great fighter to beat MP because he is pretty good himself. Junior Jones would of been knocked out by MP, Paul Ingle battered him, McKinney knocked him silly, Morales TKO's him to, Barrera hammered McKinney and McKiney knocked Jones out on the Hamed/Kelly undercard. Jones was just a bad style match up for Barrera.

You dont know what logic is yourself, why on earth say Pac aint fought a great black fighter at the lower weight when their aint one, dipshit!! junior jones wasnt around when MP entered the scene... gairy st. clair though is black, aint american... baloyi, fana & klassen too... yeah... there aint american black fighter of note when MP entered the fray...

If IT has no logic WHERE is your argument to dispel it ?? truth is you are struggling to come up with one because it actually is logical. You dont know what logic is yourself, why on earth say Pac aint fought a great black fighter at the lower weight when their aint one, dipshit!! amen to that. now thats the truth

haha and what have you answered exactly? I know punk is just glossing over people's argument without any sort of answer.

That is your opinion & it really don't mean $h!t or have much logic behind it. If it has no logic WHERE is your argument to dispel it ?? truth is you are struggling to come up with one because it actually is logical. You dont know what logic is yourself, why on earth say Pac aint fought a great black fighter at the lower weight when their aint one, dipshit!!

Life lesson for you. Don't ask a question if you don't want to hear the answer. haha and what have you answered exactly?

I never said Zahir Raheem was a great fighter but he did take Erik Morales to school & everybody knows it. I will never discredit Pacmans career also. But if haters can Barrera was more skilled than Morales the hall of Fame great career of Floyd Mayweather because he never fought a cheater like Margarito I think questions can be asked about Pacmans choice of opponents also. Thats right because Margarito is the only fighter out there that people wanted to see him fight, lets forget about the numerous others guys out there he could of fought but did'nt. Any fighter who avoids the best competition AVAILABLE should be discredited, whether he is capable of beating them or not.

bah ive had enough of you. seems like you cant even answer a simple question. Life lesson for you. Don't ask a question if you don't want to hear the answer.

Do me a favour. Morales and Barrera are far greater fighters than Chico and Castillo who were imo not on the same level. Hernandez best wins is ?? Pacquiao has a better resume, so why would he need any Mayweather opponents to reflect better on his resume? its Mayweather who needs to pad his record up because it looks weak in comparison. That is your opinion & it really don't mean $h!t or have much logic behind it.

I never said Zahir Raheem was a great fighter but he did take Erik Morales to school & everybody knows it. I will never discredit Pacmans career also. But if haters can discredit the hall of Fame great career of Floyd Mayweather because he never fought a cheater like Margarito I think questions can be asked about Pacmans choice of opponents also. bah ive had enough of you. seems like you cant even answer a simple question.

Myself i find its all bullshit!

dont give me that answer dude. i said name 3 in their division. now answer the first question. and you actually think zahir is a great black fighter? if so how come he has only 1 notable win? I never said Zahir Raheem was a great fighter but he did take Erik Morales to school & everybody knows it. I will never discredit Pacmans career also. But if haters can discredit the hall of Fame great career of Floyd Mayweather because he never fought a cheater like Margarito I think questions can be asked about Pacmans choice of opponents also.

Pacman would give both of his arms to have the names Hernandez, Diego Corrales, Castillo twice, & olympic medalist on his resume. Lol worst post in this thread. People are grasping at anything to discredit pac and unfortunately its come down to race, funny how people say he hasn't fought the slick black american fighter but its laughable looking at the names he fought and considering where these names were in the sport at the time. Keep hatin people.

Pacman would give both of his arms to have the names Hernandez, Diego Corrales, Castillo twice, & olympic medalist on his resume. Do me a favour. Morales and Barrera are far greater fighters than Chico and Castillo who were imo not on the same level. Hernandez best wins is ?? Pacquiao has a better resume, so why would he need any Mayweather opponents to reflect better on his resume? its Mayweather who needs to pad his record up because it looks weak in comparison.

I am not trying to take anything away from the excellent career the Pacman has put together but it is the truth. What real Black fighter has Pac fought? He keeps on fighting the 3 amigos & beating the same fighters Floyd Mayweather got criticized for fighting. Umm no he wouldnt. Stick to the topic. Pac has always avoded slick defensive style boxers...like Guzman. couldn't have said it better myself...................Look man Pac-Man is the type of guy that would fight Bernard Hopkins or Arthur Abraham...the guy has no fear of ANYONE but Arum on the other hand said it with his own mouth "I don't think putting Pac in the ring with a fighter who moves alot is such a good idea" and he was talking about Juan Guzman

Pacman would give both of his arms to have the names Hernandez, Diego Corrales, Castillo twice, & olympic medalist on his resume. I doubt that, Paq is at least able to say that he didn't duck the top 3 fighters in his division. Floyd can't even put "Fought the best in my division(s)."

Umm no he wouldnt. Stick to the topic. Pac has always avoded slick defensive style boxers...like Guzman. he avoided guzman for Marquez(far better fighter than Guzman), david diaz(for a belt), Oscar delahoya(biggest paycheck), Ricky Hatton(paycheck, a 140 linear title) and now miguel cotto(far bigger threat than Guzman) and pacman talking about fighting floyd(floyd the one ****ed up the fight by getting injured). Really last time guzman was about to fight a threat he chicken out like bitch and went over weight.

Nah, they had a chance at beating him so he'd never want to fight them. As far as the topic goes, we have a black president, how much more can the racial card be played, seriously? Obama is mixed & go learn some history. You will find that Racism is a serious problem throughout human history not a card game.

nothing more than journalistic sensationalism. If u bothered to look at Pacquiao's record, u can see he fought 3 straight "black" skinned fighters. But i guess thats not good enough because the werent "american black." Then we hear the garbage about "american black" fighters because they are slick. As if only "black american" fighters are the only fighters capable of being slick. 6-23-2001 Lehnolo Ledwaba tko 6 11-10-2001 Agapito Sanchez (very slick & dirty fighter) Draw 6-8-2002 Jorge Julio tko 2 That's 3 straight "black" fighters. But since they are not "american black" they are incapable of being slick. yeah its sickening, from black to american black. just one excuse after another