Are we overrating Pac here?

pacquiao is the truth......i used to think a fight w/ cotto would be a HUGE mismatch.... i think it'd be a great fight now.

Yea, he wasn't that good. He came in to the match with his new 'skills'. Then completely forgot about it and just ran at Manny. That seemed to be good enough to have his moments with Floyd and take him to 10

pac is a pretty special fighter

I can't ignore that no one has ever made Hatton look like an amateur, not even Mayweather. And Mayweather did say that Hatton gave him the toughest fight of his career. People need to admit the obvious fact: Pacquiao is just so good, he makes otherwise top-notch fighters look completely outclassed. I have never seen anyone dominate on the level that Pac is and I believe just what Roach says.......skill for skill, he beats them all. He has not been wrong...Oscar can't pull the trigger, Hatton's chin is weak..we are going for the chin and the fight won't last 3 rds I would hope that the proof is in the pudding and at some point people will concede to what they are seeing......he is the best P4P by far!

Nah, Pac is the real deal no doubt.

Yes we are overrating him. He's P4P #1 but is nuts are being riden too hard after beating some1 we knew he'd tear apart.

I think we can safely say at this point.. That Manny Pacquiao is not overrated.. In fact he is most likely the best boxer alive P4P .. Mayweather's main strengths are hand speed and in fight adjustment.. I think Pac is faster,hits harder.. and Roach seems to come up with perfect plan for whoever Pac faces.. Thus negating somewhat what Floyd might do to adjust.. I have never picked anyone to beat Mayweather.. Not Cotto, Not Marg , Not Mosley.. But I think Pac would .. and emphatically

Doesn't that make Pacquiao seem even better? Oh I agree. It just seems that the idiots here will never give that credit. First comes the doubters about him fighting Diaz in the heavier weight, then a "zombie" DLH, and now a bum in Ricky. After beating them 3 in humiliating fashion, most of those haters are now gone but here comes the PBF nuthuggers even though the Pac/PBF fight has not been discussed. Guess not everyone can be satisfied. Oh well....

Im not a fan of him at all but there's no denying the truth and pac is the Truth! i second this notion ,word for word.

I mean people are saying he would beat Cotto and all these other huge welters... I beg to differ.. He may give them trouble being a southpaw and most of all his blazing speed. But lets get real here. Hatton arguably had the worst defense, gameplan, widest punches I ever seen at a level this high. It was like dude was an novice.. Taking nothing away from Pac, he did what he was supposed to do vs Hatton and Oscar in amazing fashion. But come on. He struggled and arguably lost to a 35 year old JMM. But yes, a Mayweather vs Pacman needs to happen to settle this.. I actually think Pac has a better chance vs Floyd than he does a Cotto or Mosley @ 147 If they meet at 140, Pacquiao KO's Marquez inside 6 rounds. No matter what you think of Hatton, he ruled 140 for almost 5 years, was undefeated at the weight, fought some credible opposition, and is one of the tougher fighters in the sport. Pacquiao ended his reign in less than 6 minutes. In fact he's lucky to make it past the first round. It was the manner in which he did it that makes it special, seeing as his only defeat before this fight took 10 rounds of roughing up and wearing down before the KO happened. Manny almost put Hatton on a stretcher with some of the first punches he threw. Some of us thought he was seriously damaged from the finishing blow! The power in that shot was sickening. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

I hate that this fight ended up so quickly. Because in theory, Pac still has not been tested above 130. The haters will say this, no doubt. All previous 3 opponents could barely put up a performance to make it interesting. Doesn't that make Pacquiao seem even better?

I don't think we're overrating him at all. Hatton was in a GREAT condition for this fight. Sure his defence was non existant, but it's always been that way. Ricky was unbeaten at 140 and had been the king of that weight for years. Then Pacquiao comes in and makes him look like a complete amateur. He is the only fighter I have seen make Ricky fight on the back foot and push him back. All this from a guy who has never even fought at the weight before. There is no way to overrate something like that..

Pac totally destroys people like they have never been destroyed, but then say but he wont beat this person or that person ie wont beat Cotto, or Mosely. Because Pac keeps beating people, why dont people assume Pac would beat SSM, or a Cotto? If Pac would have lost to Hatton, then by all means assume he cant beat SSM or Cotto. But how can Pac get discredited whatever he does? Hes the best in the world so why shouldnt he beat Cotto, or SSM? SSM has seen better days. Cotto has yet to prove himself like Pac.

I hate that this fight ended up so quickly. Because in theory, Pac still has not been tested above 130. The haters will say this, no doubt. All previous 3 opponents could barely put up a performance to make it interesting.

He fought a clueless Hatton and an absolutely shot and a weight drained De La Hoya. He's been impressive for sure but some people are taking it a little too far with the hype. The more fights he wins, the more excuses people keep making for the fighters that he beats. When does it end? With a win over Money? Or will there be an excuse there as well. The guy can't get credit no matter what he does, maybe because he is so humble. Maybe if he said, "Yeah, I make Hatton my bitch now da world knows my name" he would get credit for a win for once.

Not to downplay his achievements, but I think the fight said a lot more about how 'not-great' Ricky was, then how 'great' Manny is. Again, not trying to take away from Pac's blistering KO.

I mean people are saying he would beat Cotto and all these other huge welters... I beg to differ.. He may give them trouble being a southpaw and most of all his blazing speed. But lets get real here. Hatton arguably had the worst defense, gameplan, widest punches I ever seen at a level this high. It was like dude was an novice.. Taking nothing away from Pac, he did what he was supposed to do vs Hatton and Oscar in amazing fashion. But come on. He struggled and arguably lost to a 35 year old JMM. But yes, a Mayweather vs Pacman needs to happen to settle this.. I actually think Pac has a better chance vs Floyd than he does a Cotto or Mosley @ 147 Do you think Pacquiao still fights like that? The 35 JMM who ko'd Juan Diaz?

He fought a clueless Hatton and an absolutely shot and a weight drained De La Hoya. He's been impressive for sure but some people are taking it a little too far with the hype.

140 is a welter too lol..so 147's must go down for the money..

I mean people are saying he would beat Cotto and all these other huge welters... I beg to differ.. He may give them trouble being a southpaw and most of all his blazing speed. But lets get real here. Hatton arguably had the worst defense, gameplan, widest punches I ever seen at a level this high. It was like dude was an novice.. Taking nothing away from Pac, he did what he was supposed to do vs Hatton and Oscar in amazing fashion. But come on. He struggled and arguably lost to a 35 year old JMM. But yes, a Mayweather vs Pacman needs to happen to settle this.. I actually think Pac has a better chance vs Floyd than he does a Cotto or Mosley @ 147 PAc will beat all the names you've mentioned biatch!!!