Who's fights are more entertaining to watch, Froch's or Calzaghe's?

According to you he can't throw a hurtful punch (you have never fought him), yet the people who did fight him including sparring partners say he hits hard. Who should I believe? Believe his real KO (knocking people down for the full count) record it's one of the worst ever for a title holder.

That was a thing of beauty! :wow: Some people.., Froch has been involved in a possible fight of the year so far, and a round of the year so far. Calzaghe is not a particulay skilled boxer text book wise and is very sloppy to watch too. Compairing the likes of Mayweathers skills to a sloppy Joe - a man often saved by his chin - is an insult to boxing.

I'd take a masterclass such as Calzaghe-Lacy over anything Froch has done and is likely to do in his entire career. Thanks. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

froch's last 2 fights were fairly entertaining but not due to skill. calzaghe has skills froch can only dream of.

It's true, Calzaghe won by tko and that's what I meant by knockdown. But Mitchell wasnt trading blow when the ref call it, he was off balance and I remember it as a good stoppage. When I'll have 5 minutes, I'll go on youtube to refresh my memory about this fight... Sheika was trading blow with Calzaghe when the ref step in.... That stoppage s*ck like hell! yes you should go back and watch it. watch the showtime version they show it in slow motion. calzaghe is missing everything while mitchell is bobbing around trying to clear the cobwebs. then they both start trading shots and mitchell lands and calzaghe misses but mitchells momentum flings him into the ropes and the ref stops it like an idiot. i also found it funny when calzaghe tries to give the ref the signal to stop it. then he denies it in the post fight interview and call jim gray biased lol! HOMETOWN

i dont like either fighter.

From what I have seen...Calzaghe vs Manfredo/Lacy/Kessler/Hopkins/Jones. Froch vs Pascal/Taylor, I would say Froch vs Taylor and Pascal are already more entertaining than the afformentioned Calzaghe fights. I guess it has to do with their styles, Froch can be hit and gets himself into wars while calzaghe continuously throws slaps/punches and wins one-sided fights(except against Hopkins). froch all day...calzaghe slaps

Behave. Sheika was staggering around the ring at the time of the stoppage. The Mitchell one was fair enough IMO - he was being bounced around the ring. Probably looked worse than he was though and could have continued but when you see a man bounce from one end of the ring to the other you kind of think the worst. no he wasn't he was punching calzaghe in the face. just cause he was being hit flush doesn't mean he was hurt. calzaghe can't hurt anything. how hurt can sheika be if he's still landing clean punches? mitchell stopped bouncing around and was punching calzaghe in the face. how hurt can he be if he's still landing clean punches? he then got tangled up and fell into the ropes untouched by calzaghe and the ref stops it? HOMETOWN!

Who is Pascal? imo, someone better than probably 95%+ of Joe's opponents So, of 46 opponents he's better than all bar two? He wouldn't make the top 10. Probably not top 15 either.

He does, damn great pointing that out because now its stuck in my head Who the **** is pascal? That boxer who is slick but doesn't even really have a defense. The boxer who appeared to have avoided Miranda. Pascal ain't shit and he is a nobody. He is moving up to light heavy weight, and he probably will lose his first match and then blame it on the weight like a baby. Who is Pascal? imo, someone better than probably 95%+ of Joe's opponents

I'm a boxing fan not a street fighting fan- so definatley Calzaghe

Behave. Sheika was staggering around the ring at the time of the stoppage. The Mitchell one was fair enough IMO - he was being bounced around the ring. Probably looked worse than he was though and could have continued but when you see a man bounce from one end of the ring to the other you kind of think the worst.

the ref ko'd mitchell while he was punching calzaghe. he didnt trade blows with bika he clinched all night he traded blows with sheika until the ref stopped the fight while sheika was punching calzaghe some warrior It's true, Calzaghe won by tko and that's what I meant by knockdown. But Mitchell wasnt trading blow when the ref call it, he was off balance and I remember it as a good stoppage. When I'll have 5 minutes, I'll go on youtube to refresh my memory about this fight... Sheika was trading blow with Calzaghe when the ref step in.... That stoppage s*ck like hell!

Some of you seem to be misunderstanding the question. The thread starter asked who's fights are more entertaining, not which fighter is more exciting. Froch's style brings excitements into the fights.

Froch, because he has no defense, which always makes for an exciting fight. Plus he can bang, which helps for KO highlight reels. Calzaghe's slapping style gives me no enjoyment, although i did like his domination over Lacy.

You're Joking right? The guy has only ever put 2 people down for the ten count in his whole career. That might be a mather of opinion...

daggums posts are far more exciting than both of these two

Froch is in exciting fights but is not an exciting fighter, his fights are exciting because he has no defence and gets punched in the face alot. LOL, tell how it is.

I vote for Calzaghe. Knockdown in the first round and still dominates the fight is entertaining.

Froch is in exciting fights but is not an exciting fighter, his fights are exciting because he has no defence and gets punched in the face alot.