Why does everyone here hate hatton??

I have noticed on this board that everyone seems to either proclaim their dislike towards Hatton, or simply hide it behind comments and disrespectful posts. Nobody on here gives Hatton credit for anything. Hatton is a good fighter and would not be in the situation hes in right now if he wasnt. Yet nobody seems to think hes done anything of any worth. He has only lost ONCE to the best P4P fighter at that time, and he was actually not THAT bad if you watch the fight again - he just got aggravated by the ref, lost his cool and it cost him the fight. Prior to the Malignaggi fight, people on here were questioning whether or not Hatton would win, and many people on here thought that Malignaggi would win. Yet after the fight when Hatton destroyed him, NOBODY gave him credit for the win. Malignaggi was a much tougher opponent than ODLH was when he fought Pac, and yet people give Pacquiao more credit for that win, even though Hatton could easily have beaten that Oscar - heck even Amir Khan could have beaten that Oscar. I also saw an improvement in Hattons boxing ability in his last fight, more jabs, head movement, faster etc, and also if you watch the fight he didnt do hardly ANY hugging. Malignaggi was the one hugging Hatton so as not to go down. YET people on here dont see this, and still think that Hatton is the same old boxer, who hugs all the time, cant box etc. Hatton IS stronger than Pac as well. I have seen people on here say that Pacquiao is stronger than Hatton, which is just not true. There is hardly any difference in their size and measurements, but Hatton IS the harder puncher, and you can tell this from watching their fights, and the amount of KOs Hattons had in comparison to Pacquiao, as opposed to TKOs. Pacquiao will not trouble Hatton until the later rounds in their fight, as Hatton is very tough and will only wear down from an accumulation of punches. However, all Hatton needs to do is to land a few solid punches on Pacquiao early on and its lights out for Pac. You are a COMPLETE FOOL if you think Pacquiao will not get hit in this fight. Even Oscar managed to hit Pac, and HURT him in the process. Hatton IS improved under Floyd Snr as well, and so you can guarantee that Hatton will be hit less and be able to cut off the ring and resultantly hit Pac more often. I know im the only one that thinks Hatton will win quite easily, but thats the only way I see this fight going. I know I'm going to get flamed to death for my opinions, but I don't care at all to be honest. So, anyways, why does everyone on here appear blind to the achievements and abilities of Hatton?

Comments (20)

You're just weird. Sorry. I won't reply to you again. You're just too strange. Yea, you cant argue back so, you make an excuse AGAIN. How the heck am I wierd, when all im doing is telling you facts, and you're just coming back with stupid replies? Tell you what, grow up and accept the fact that your bf pacquiao is not the best at everything. Fcuking cock sucking piece of sh*t

17y ago

S_A_M_U_R_A_I

Still oblivious to the fact that Hatton can break bones with his punches, where as Pacquiao definitley cant. Intensity and aggression also in Hattons favour. Therefore, Hatton=Stronger. What part of that dont you understand?? Do i need to slip in a Pacquiao compliment to make you feel better? Pacquiao=Faster + Better skilled. Happy? I state the facts and you call me a lunatic? What a fcking piece of s*** you are, pal. You're just weird. Sorry. I won't reply to you again. You're just too strange. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

17y ago

S_A_M_U_R_A_I

when was the last time hatton knocked someone out? hatton is bigger and maybe stronger but i think paquiao's hits harder I also think it's possible Pacquiao hits harder, only some people completely underestimate him. Still, it's not how hard you punch that wins fights, once again, it's skill. I'm pretty sure Jeff lacy hits harder than Calzaghe these days, but it didn't do him any good at all. Strength means nothing either. If it did (example) Ali would have lost to Foreman. Skills and speed is more important than any small difference in power. Both Pacquiao and Hatton hit hard, but what should set them apart is everything BUT punch power. I'll tell you what though, if Pacquiao beats Hatton I'm gonna have fun bumping this thread. :) 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

17y ago

_JCHING_

My argument is and always has been: how the hell do you know who hits harder? You're a lunatic. Seriously, seek medical help ASAP. Still oblivious to the fact that Hatton can break bones with his punches, where as Pacquiao definitley cant. Intensity and aggression also in Hattons favour. Therefore, Hatton=Stronger. What part of that dont you understand?? Do i need to slip in a Pacquiao compliment to make you feel better? Pacquiao=Faster + Better skilled. Happy? I state the facts and you call me a lunatic? What a fcking piece of s*** you are, pal.

17y ago

S_A_M_U_R_A_I

Oh, and one more thing, you still didnt argue the fact that Hattons punching power can break bones, Pacquiao's cant. Therefore, Hatton=Stronger and you fcking know it. My argument is and always has been: how the hell do you know who hits harder? You're a lunatic. Seriously, seek medical help ASAP. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

17y ago

letsgobrady

Oh, and one more thing, you still didnt argue the fact that Hattons punching power can break bones, Pacquiao's cant. Therefore, Hatton=Stronger and you fcking know it. when was the last time hatton knocked someone out? hatton is bigger and maybe stronger but i think paquiao's hits harder

17y ago

S_A_M_U_R_A_I

I dont fcking care what some commentator said, all of them are biased to some degree, especially HBO. OH, and ONCE AGAIN, ignoring the statements that you cant argue against properly. TWAT. LOL You have no replies to what I typed, only weak insults! 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

17y ago

_JCHING_

You really are a crybaby. :bottle: Please -- go watch the first Pacquiao-Marquez fight and listen to Jim Lampley's words as the first bell rings. Come back, then tell me what you heard. Or don't you have this fight? Do you want me to type out what he said, because to be honest, you're not worth my time. ****ing Hatton nuthugger. Get Ricky's dick out your mouth. Twat. Do you not think the sound of a punch depends on microphone placement at all? Being an ex-sound engineer, I can tell you for sure that it does. If a fighter happens to be standing near a mic, it will pick up the sound of the punches. If a punch happens to land on a glove, and therefore is blocked, it will also be loud. Does that mean it was a powerful punch that hurt the opponent? The volume of a punch depends on a number of things. Sound, especially when multiple microphones are introduced into the equation, is certainly not an accurate measure of the generated impact. I would bet you can find plenty of Tyson fights where some of the punches were not even audible at all. Does that mean Tyson hits like Paulie Malignaggi? Of course it doesn't. Your argument that "if a punch is loud it must be hard" doesn't stand up well at all. Oh, and one more thing, you still didnt argue the fact that Hattons punching power can break bones, Pacquiao's cant. Therefore, Hatton=Stronger and you fcking know it.

17y ago

_JCHING_

You really are a crybaby. :bottle: Please -- go watch the first Pacquiao-Marquez fight and listen to Jim Lampley's words as the first bell rings. Come back, then tell me what you heard. Or don't you have this fight? Do you want me to type out what he said, because to be honest, you're not worth my time. ****ing Hatton nuthugger. Get Ricky's dick out your mouth. Twat. Do you not think the sound of a punch depends on microphone placement at all? Being an ex-sound engineer, I can tell you for sure that it does. If a fighter happens to be standing near a mic, it will pick up the sound of the punches. If a punch happens to land on a glove, and therefore is blocked, it will also be loud. Does that mean it was a powerful punch that hurt the opponent? The volume of a punch depends on a number of things. Sound, especially when multiple microphones are introduced into the equation, is certainly not an accurate measure of the generated impact. I would bet you can find plenty of Tyson fights where some of the punches were not even audible at all. Does that mean Tyson hits like Paulie Malignaggi? Of course it doesn't. Your argument that "if a punch is loud t must be hard" doesn't stand up well at all. I dont fcking care what some commentator said, all of them are biased to some degree, especially HBO. OH, and ONCE AGAIN, ridiculous reply. HBO will use the same sound equipment to broadcast their fights, and so the sound quality will be identical each fight. Hattons punches have much more sting and power to them. Oh and its NOT ONLY sound, as I stated, you can tell Tysons punches hurt from the impact it makes on the fighters and intensity in which he throws them, just as Hattons. TWAT.

17y ago

letsgobrady

I did read other posts, but dont think he does get the credit he deserves for that fight. Oh, and Pacquiao does not ****ing deserve major props for beating David Diaz or a zombie ODLH! paulie didn't look like he wanted to fight that night but that was the fight that made me except hatton, yes i hate his wrestling style but he did beat a very slick boxer in paulie,the reason my karma is read is because some obssesive hatton fans gave me red karma for sayin that the paulie win was better than urango

17y ago

S_A_M_U_R_A_I

Again, pretty much ignoring what im saying, and making pathetic excuses for replies. Pacquiao cannot break ribs with body shots. FACT. Hatton can and did. FACT. You can tell how hard you hit something from the sound it makes. FACT. Just go and suck Pacs dick, you twat. You really are a crybaby. :bottle: Please -- go watch the first Pacquiao-Marquez fight and listen to Jim Lampley's words as the first bell rings. Come back, then tell me what you heard. Or don't you have this fight? Do you want me to type out what he said, because to be honest, you're not worth my time. ****ing Hatton nuthugger. Get Ricky's dick out your mouth. Twat. Do you not think the sound of a punch depends on microphone placement at all? Being an ex-sound engineer, I can tell you for sure that it does. If a fighter happens to be standing near a mic, it will pick up the sound of the punches. If a punch happens to land on a glove, and therefore is blocked, it will also be loud. Does that mean it was a powerful punch that hurt the opponent? The volume of a punch depends on a number of things. Sound, especially when multiple microphones are introduced into the equation, is certainly not an accurate measure of the generated impact. I would bet you can find plenty of Tyson fights where some of the punches were not even audible at all. Does that mean Tyson hits like Paulie Malignaggi? Of course it doesn't. Your argument that "if a punch is loud it must be hard" doesn't stand up well at all. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

17y ago

letsgobrady

i hate the fact that hatton wrestles more than he boxes in a sport called boxing

17y ago

Scary

I like Hatton A LOT!

17y ago

_JCHING_

So these are your "facts" that I cannot argue against? That Pacquiao can't break ribs? Wow... I'll tell you what -- load up the first Pacquiao-Marquez fight. Listen to Jim Lampley's words as the first bell begins. That should tell you everything you need to know. Again, unless you've been in the ring with either Hatton AND Pacquiao, how the **** would you know who hits harder? Do YOU feel the impact? And you can tell Hatton hits harder because his punches are louder? LOL. This is a retarded conversation. I don't even know why I'm replying. Again, pretty much ignoring what im saying, and making pathetic excuses for replies. Pacquiao cannot break ribs with body shots. FACT. Hatton can and did. FACT. You can tell how hard you hit something from the sound it makes. FACT. Just go and suck Pacs dick, you twat.

17y ago

S_A_M_U_R_A_I

I did read other posts, but dont think he does get the credit he deserves for that fight. Oh, and Pacquiao does not ****ing deserve major props for beating David Diaz or a zombie ODLH! Then Hatton doesn't deserve credit for beating a shot Castillo and a feather-fisted fairy. Let's pretend the Pac-DLH fight hasn't happened yet. If I said to you "if Pacquiao beats Oscar up and TKO's him, he deserves major credit", would you agree? 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

17y ago

S_A_M_U_R_A_I

If you read the post earlier, I posed the question whether Pac could break the ribs of anyone with a body shot, as Hatton did with Castillo. You ignored this question. I also said that you can tell who is the harder puncher from watching fights by the reaction of the opposing fighter, the impact, the sound of punches etc. You ignored this also, despite calling me ridiculous for stating you can tell from watching fighters, who hits harder. So these are your "facts" that I cannot argue against? That Pacquiao can't break ribs? Wow... I'll tell you what -- load up the first Pacquiao-Marquez fight. Listen to Jim Lampley's words as the first bell begins. That should tell you everything you need to know. Again, unless you've been in the ring with either Hatton AND Pacquiao, how the **** would you know who hits harder? Do YOU feel the impact? And you can tell Hatton hits harder because his punches are louder? LOL. This is a retarded conversation. I don't even know why I'm replying. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

17y ago

_JCHING_

He got the credit he deserved. On the other hand, plenty of people also realized that Malignaggi is not the biggest threat in the world and it was just an easy fight anyway. So why SHOULD he get loads of credit for beating a guy who can't crack an egg? He doesn't ****ing deserve major props for beating Paulie Malignaggi! You have been here since February. Did you not read older posts where people gave Hatton credit, or have you only read posts since February? I did read other posts, but dont think he does get the credit he deserves for that fight. Oh, and Pacquiao does not ****ing deserve major props for beating David Diaz or a zombie ODLH!

17y ago

pcr405

When americans (ther're usually the haters) put forward their reason for hating hatton they go look look he lost to pbf and beat mailinaggi he jsut isnt good enough. what has this got to do with hating somone. 1. Hes one of the best fighters outthere ffs. 2. He seems like a genuine average joe, loves boxing, has ambitions and seems like a nice guy. The only reason i think they hate him is because hes from across the pond. Sad and shallow really. NOTE:This dosnt account for all americans most of them havnt got there dicks in there mouth.

17y ago

partacus

Unless a boxer is American (or based in America) it takes a lot for the yanks to give them credit. Get ready for the 1000s of threads saying Hatton cheated or that it was unfair if Hatton wins.

17y ago

_JCHING_

What "facts"? I can argue all day, my friend. Go ahead and start the argument. If you read the post earlier, I posed the question whether Pac could break the ribs of anyone with a body shot, as Hatton did with Castillo. You ignored this question. I also said that you can tell who is the harder puncher from watching fights by the reaction of the opposing fighter, the impact, the sound of punches etc. You ignored this also, despite calling me ridiculous for stating you can tell from watching fighters, who hits harder.

17y ago