Bayless or Weeks. Or maybe tempt Richard Steele out of retirement to make it interesting.
As long as it's not Cortez, Cotton or Nady I'll be fine with it. Seriously, if it's those 3 I'll be tempted to change the channel and demand a refund...
Both refs are good, but as I knew all along...Bayless' way of counting: unrivaled.
http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l113/blaow69/kenny-1.jpg
it is legendary tbh.
as for refs that need not apply........
the ones that need to be avoided are, cortez, nady, cotton, and lawrence cole. this is the blacklist of refs in my book..............
I don't know how some of those refs still get big fights.
There has got to be someone dropping backhanders somewhere!
i voted smoger, but either one is good, both guys are terrific refs. bayless is a great guy, i've met him before and his brother, both guys are class acts.
little trivia fact for ya, bayless and his brother were the first black teachers here in las vegas back in 1972 if memory serves correct......
as for refs that need not apply........
the ones that need to be avoided are, cortez, nady, cotton, and lawrence cole. this is the blacklist of refs in my book..............
I like Smoger here. Bayless will stop this earlier. I want to get more of my PPV $$$ worth. Smogger will Let Pac to Land a little bit more punches before he stop the fight.
I forgot his name, the one that ref JMM-Jaca and Pac vs MAB 1.
Lawrence Cole... Clearly the most biased ref I have seen... Called a legit knock down a slip and a slip a knock down for Pac/Barrera 1 and got caught giving advice to JMM againts Jaca through his mic...
I want to add one to the mix
Mitch ****en Halpern!
ahhahaha
just messing
I'd go with Bayless
Lets see hatton try and win a fight based on boxing using punches not holding and grapeling.
I hate to hear all these bitches talk about giving pac an advantage
dont hate cause your guy cant box
all he does is throw a right left and come in to hold you
who the **** wants to see that
Ive got my money on the ring post for a second knockout!
http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:9jXTyIF6yT1suM:http://www.orange.co.uk/images/editorial/Hatton170.jpg
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:F--oza0UgUeScM:http://www.tkogoods.com/images/product/main/Lonsdale%2520ring%2520corner%2520pads%2520-%2520main.jpg
does hatton have night terrors of ringposts KOing him?
I want to add one to the mix
Mitch ****en Halpern!
ahhahaha
just messing
I'd go with Bayless
Lets see hatton try and win a fight based on boxing using punches not holding and grapeling.
I hate to hear all these bitches talk about giving pac an advantage
dont hate cause your guy cant box
all he does is throw a right left and come in to hold you
who the **** wants to see that
Ive got my money on the ring post for a second knockout!
http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:9jXTyIF6yT1suM:http://www.orange.co.uk/images/editorial/Hatton170.jpg
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:F--oza0UgUeScM:http://www.tkogoods.com/images/product/main/Lonsdale%2520ring%2520corner%2520pads%2520-%2520main.jpg
the ref from Berto-Collazo....the one that took a point away from Berto for holding
I agree. Hatton would have a thousand points deducted before the third round.
Steve Smoger cuz I want to see Hatton get knocked out.
Smoger might allow Hatton to turn this WWE. I think this one requires a little bit of regulation. Not too much just a bit. When Cotto fought Malinaggi, Smoger let Malinaggi wrestle like crazy.
smoger or weeks.cortez & nady are good refs nut neither let's guys fight out of clinches.as long as the boxers are not holding they should be allowed to tie up & bang to the body.neither of those guys let's that happen which would give pacman an advantage & I think that is wrong.hatton gets inside,bangs the body then ties his opponent up but he always fights out & doesn't hold like all the hatton haters claim.Cortez did that to hatton vs mayweather & nady did it to ruiz vs jones jr.as soon as they got close they called break & that is ok if they are holding with both hands but that wasn't the case