Margarito is guilty, even if he's found innocent.

If he is inoocent he is innocent. Mud sticks, but it shouldnt.

nazim said margarito didnt object at all to rewrapping, so even if it is true that they found some object for this fight, it does not mean that he was aware of it. it also does not mean that he used this object in other fights. like t said, we know nothing really about the situation, so lets hold up on criticizing a warrior who has risked his life and fought his heart out many times for our amusement. If he happens to be guilty, we can pass judgement on him then.... Great post, man. I tried to give you green K, but it wouldn't let me. all fighters have fear. courage is not the absence of fear, but being able to conduct yourself well in the presence of fear... That's going in my sig :fing02:

Yep, you got sheetrock falling out of your wraps.. You are GUILTY. "I didn't know!" BS. Shows you his lack of heart if he already knew he was not capable of winning without cheating. Couldn't sleep b4 the Cotto fight... what an undercover pussy. Clearly for Margarito it was more about the $$$ and by any means necessary. Cotto has always been a proud fighter who would not want to win by using loaded gloves. Goes to show you the different types of people in the world. undercover pussy? all fighters have fear. courage is not the absence of fear, but being able to conduct yourself well in the presence of fear... nazim said margarito didnt object at all to rewrapping, so even if it is true that they found some object for this fight, it does not mean that he was aware of it. it also does not mean that he used this object in other fights. like t said, we know nothing really about the situation, so lets hold up on criticizing a warrior who has risked his life and fought his heart out many times for our amusement. If he happens to be guilty, we can pass judgement on him then....

He already got caught cheating but to say he never cheated in the past? That is like saying you got sucking someone's d1ck but you claim that you are not g@y and that it was only your first time. Once a d1ck sucker, always a d1ck sucker, right? He may have been caught cheating, we don't know that 100% yet (Although, it looks bad, and he probably was). What I mean is, there is no evidence of him cheating in the past, however we will all assume that he's been doing it, and write wins off. Hence, he's guilty even if he's innocent. I'm not saying either way just yet, i'm waiting for the investigation. As for the latter part of your post, not really. Maybe you did just decide to try something, maybe Margarito knew Shane was more dangerous than many (Including odds-makers) thought.

He already got caught cheating but to say he never cheated in the past? That is like saying you got caught sucking someone's d1ck but you claim that you are not g@y and that it was only your first time. Once a d1ck sucker, always a d1ck sucker, right? Your starting to scare me you are STOP IT!!

no we live in a world where your innocent if you continue to win... just look at kobe No we live in a world where your innocent if you have money...Just look at michael Jackson

BUT WE LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE YOUR Guilty until proven Innocent no we live in a world where your innocent if you continue to win... just look at kobe

BUT WE LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE YOUR Guilty until proven Innocent Hell yeh... Im gulity of not being able to take my eyes off your avatar but if im asked im gonna lie and say i wasnt looking

BUT WE LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE YOUR Guilty until proven Innocent That's the problem. The media says something, we assume it's true. So we shout that people are guilty, before any form of trial. Which is unfair, as this may affect the judgement of the trial..if everyone assumes he's guilty already, does he really have a chance?

Seriously, it's got to a point now, where even if it comes out Margarito wasn't trying to cheat, he is still damned from now on and some will always discredit him. The main principle of law is; "Innocent until proven Guilty", however no one seems to be following that here. As we have everyone throwing their opinion out there, most of them condemming Tony. How about we wait to see the outcome of the investigation? None of us know all the facts, whether we like that fact or not. BUT WE LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE YOUR Guilty until proven Innocent

Had there been nothing there, there would be no investigation. This ain't going to be no Mickey Mouse court, they have brought in the Justice Dept. You don't bring the Justice Dept into "Nothing there" This is a Federal Crime. You don't have the FEDS meddling in shiet like this unless there is something serious to look at and this is serious. Bye bye Capetillo There's no doubt that something was there, prior to the Mosley fight. If it is Plaster of Paris, then **** Margarito. But even so, we cannot say claim his entire career rested on the use of it. There is no proof of it, only speculation. Ahahahahaha...... Man, you are so innocent it's funny. Anyone with knowledge of law will agree with me, so i'll take that as a compliment.

agree.. the majority of people on this website are idiots though, so what can you do?

NO! NO! NO! Hell no T... He must be burnt on a stake for this... I want his mullet dead or alive..... And Oj didnt kill that white women Mis-use of the quote button im reporting you now!!!

look whether antonio margarito is innocent or not who really cares ? I do, and i'm sure a lot of others do. Loading your gloves is very dangerous, and you could cause serious harm to someone by doing it.

Yep, you got sheetrock falling out of your wraps.. You are GUILTY. "I didn't know!" BS. Shows you his lack of heart if he already knew he was not capable of winning without cheating. Couldn't sleep b4 the Cotto fight... what an undercover pussy. Clearly for Margarito it was more about the $$$ and by any means necessary. Cotto has always been a proud fighter who would not want to win by using loaded gloves. Goes to show you the different types of people in the world. I'm a Cotto fan, does it annoy me to think he may have cheated to beat Cotto? Yes, it does. However, there is no proof at all that he did. So I can't use it as an excuse for the loss, just wait for the rematch and see. He had something in his gloves, we can't say what it was. Although, I do believe he did try to cheat against Mosley, I was more so refering to the rest of his career, where we have no evidence of foul play.

NO! NO! NO! Hell no T... He must be burnt on a stake for this... I want his mullet dead or alive..... And Oj didnt kill that white women[/QUOT oj didn't kill that white woman ..actually vanilla ice did cuz oj wouldn't help fund his new cd..look whether antonio margarito is innocent or not who really cares ? alot of top fighters will do anything to get the egde over there opponents..mosley aint innocent..vargas too..jones jr..the list goes on but who gets caught is the question ? just let them fight it out who cares

Yeah... guilty of throwing the fight I dunno about that, if he was gunna take a dive I would have thought he'd have; 1- Made it competative, and; 2- Gone down earlier, to avoid all the punishment he took. He was genuinly hurt in the fight, I doubt he took a dive.

Seriously, it's got to a point now, where even if it comes out Margarito wasn't trying to cheat, he is still damned from now on and some will always discredit him. The main principle of law is; "Innocent until proven Guilty", however no one seems to be following that here. As we have everyone throwing their opinion out there, most of them condemming Tony. How about we wait to see the outcome of the investigation? None of us know all the facts, whether we like that fact or not. Yeah... guilty of throwing the fight

NO! NO! NO! Hell no T... He must be burnt on a stake for this... I want his mullet dead or alive..... And Oj didnt kill that white women