Boxing's Triangle Theory

If by stuggling you mean having a slightly harder time then usual landing punches on the awkward Nicaraguan then yes... he struggled. But in terms of the fight as a whole, Mosley found the right hand with ease and was never in any kind of danger.

Mosley>Mayorga Mayorga>Forrest Forrest>Mosley

Mosley was indeed struggling with Mayorga,he looked past it but that was as much himself as Mayorga's wildness,ability to box better and size.

Duran>Leonard Leonard>Hearns Hearns>Duran And theres the obvious Frazier>Ali Foreman>Frazier Ali>Foreman

bumpeddddddddd

Taylor>Hopkins Taylor was too active for Hopkins although it was a close fight Pavlik>Taylor Style clash that made Pavlik's long sledgehammer punches the factor in the fight Hopkins>Pavlik Hopkins dismantles the young pavlik.

Jones>Hopkins Too active, too good. Tarver>Jones Brutal 1 punch KO Hopkins>Tarver Tarver was weight trained and his slashing, spurt fighting style was perfect for Hopkins

Well I scored the fight and I had Mosley losing by 2 rounds to Cotto and thats with me biased towards Mosley as he is one of my favourite fighters.

Cliff Couser > Monte Barrett Don't know how that happened Monte Barrett > Domanick Guinn Got outworked Domanick Guinn > Zuri Lawrence Well Lawrence didn't exactly have enough power to hurt him... Zuri Lawrence > Jameel McCline Lawrence took advantage of McCline's stamina issues Jameel McCline > Shannon Briggs Briggs couldn't land the punch Shannon Briggs > George Foreman OK he didn't really win the fight but w/e George Foreman > Joe Frazier Fire met fire, George's fire was too much Joe Frazier > Muhammad Ali By this logic, Cliff Couser > Muhammad Ali

I didnt have Cotto beatin' Shane....like someone said, in Vegas or Cali that decision would've been different :cool2:

I thought mosley would;ve beaten cotto if the fight was in vegas so this triangle theory isnt the best. No. the fight was close because alot of rounds could of gone either way i saw cotto win 8-4. mosley most clear rounds were the 3rd and the 9th. cotto clear rounds were 1,4,5,11. the rest were either way. cotto won clearly.

What are some famous triangle theories and why do they work? Ill start. Cotto>Mosley It was a close fight anyway but a bad style clash for mosley because Cotto could land as mosley pulled away. Margarito>Cotto Cotto didnt go to the body enough, Marg took Cottos legs with bodyshots. I honestly think that this was the difference Mosley>Margarito I predicted the outcome and the exact way it would happen. Does anybody remember those MONSTER right hands that Shane landed on Mayorga? I knew he was going to land these on the Big, Slow and open Margarito. He even finished it with the same left hook he nailed Mayorga with. People say Mosley struggled against Mayorga, I couldnt dissagree more. He looked quite good, especially becase Mayorga is a messy, lunging, clinching fighter. I thought mosley would;ve beaten cotto if the fight was in vegas so this triangle theory isnt the best.