116-111 was a robbery but people kept saying including the announcers that Berto was KD at first and then deducted a pt. this messed with people's view because some people thought berto lost the first round 10-8 cuz of the supposed kd and lost another round 10-8.
114-113 was the right score. it was a close fight and not a robbery!
116-111 was a robbery but people kept saying including the announcers that Berto was KD at first and then deducted a pt. this messed with people's view because some people thought berto lost the first round 10-8 cuz of the supposed kd and lost another round 10-8.
114-113 was the right score. it was a close fight and not a robbery!
great idea for a thread..kinda like the one I posted before this one :lol1:
Yeah Papa IS A CLOWN...Berto I had winning 114-113. People saying Collazo was robbed are STUPID. It was a close fight that could have gone eithier way!
That is incredibly dumb to say. A judge has to count the deducted point. It is their job to accommodate the ref.
the judges has no choice but to score it if the referee rules it
It wasn't officially ruled a knockdown so it was a 10-9 round for Collazo, although that could have easily been called a knockdown because there was a shot landed and the ropes held him up so that's a judgment call.
I agree, Papa is a retarded commentator........
Why did you sig me, what the **** is up with people on here? That is not retarded what I said in that quote of mine. What the judges do is to try and ignore that deducted point by giving a round to berto that was collazo. Thus, that fixes the undeserved deducted point.
Agreed. The first round was a 10-9 round for Collazo. I had it 114-113 for Berto but I could understand 114-113 for Collazo also.
All of the "robery" discussion is rediculous.