Who's the better P4P #1 during their time? Pac or Floyd?

Well Currently, Pacquiao is the Unanimous P4P best. And its very Encouraging to hear he is not backing off from anyone. He is very confident of his capabilities and wants to face the very best boxing could offer ( he even wants Margarito, DEYM!):hitit: Pacquiao is the EPITOME of P4P!! speed, power, tenacity, stamina, courage, heart, and faces the very best. So what about Mayweather? Nah! 4get about him, he's a GAY!! If Pac is not afraid of Margo, y is PBF afraid of him? It is only a testament, Pac is way better than floyd-PUSSY! What do u think boxing freaks?

Comments (20)

Johnny_Awesome

Mayweather is the best boxer of this millennium. Let's just have the two fight and watch Floyd own Manny. Manny is great and yes he did beat a bigger Oscar, but Floyd is faster, stronger, and technically a more sound fighter. A Mayweather vs Pac Man fight would have the same result as Mayweather Vs Hatton. Both beat an old DLH but Floyd is clearly better.

17y ago

Pullcounter7451

floyd's got the better skillset, but pac has better resume

17y ago

dde91

Corrales and Castillo are as good as Morales and Barrera, Floyd just ruined them. If you think Pac has the skills of Floyd you're crazy. I love Pac but Hatton will kill him. Gatti's a *** HAHA.. Got Bashed for saying that dumb shit.. Carrales anf Castillo are VERY GOOD. But they aren't in the legacy of Barrera and Morales. And everybody on here seen that. Plus he beat them Both TWICE. That right there is a legacy in itself. Add the he jump to lightweight, JMM, AND DLH, THAT KILLS FLOYDS RESUME. Won fights from 106-147. He's Raw

17y ago

Ishy_Aytan

Last thing boxing needs right now is another Mayweather vs. Baldomir or a Mayweather vs. dela Hoya. Those are fights guaranteed to make casual fans turn to MMA. Awesome skills not used awesomely, awesomely stinks. :D Like i've said many times on here before, your hatred towards Floyd is beyond belief... Everypost you make critisizes him. You should go and check your self out at the doctors, you might be sick!

17y ago

badboypeenoy

He may have the balls of a wimp in your opinion but his boxing skills are awesome. You said earlier he serves boxing better retired, and I don't know how you can justify that? Last thing boxing needs right now is another Mayweather vs. Baldomir or a Mayweather vs. dela Hoya. Those are fights guaranteed to make casual fans turn to MMA. Awesome skills not used awesomely, awesomely stinks. :D

17y ago

Mayfeather

He may have the balls of a wimp in your opinion but his boxing skills are awesome. You said earlier he serves boxing better retired, and I don't know how you can justify that?

17y ago

badboypeenoy

I dont see how u can't see that Mayweather was awesome though? He's got the skills to be great, but he's got the balls of a wimp, how's that awesome? :D

17y ago

Mayfeather

I dont see how u can't see that Mayweather was awesome though?

17y ago

badboypeenoy

Their resumes are comparable but Manny does have losses while Floyd does not. It's too bad Floyd was too chicken to stick around though. That clown is unbeaten because he's chicken. Guzman and Calzaghe are unbeaten as well and Calzaghe can even argue that his resume is better than Floyd, only difference is that Floyd's American so his being "unbeaten" is given that much weight. He is a coward, and his fighting style is cowardly, he serves boxing best retired.

17y ago

Del_Coqui

American publicists have picked Floyd for the past few years knowing lately his opposition was shit, Pac fought the better opposition, took on bigger challenges, true boxing fans know who the real p4p been all along.

17y ago

Mayfeather

This is a very hard question to answer. I mean Pac has done a lot more recently but then you can't knock either of the two fighters opponents. The no losses certainly backs up Mayweathers case but then the fact that Pac has had a crazy year helps him out. Its too hard to call imo

17y ago

FasTHarD

Their resumes are comparable but Manny does have losses while Floyd does not. It's too bad Floyd was too chicken to stick around though. You dont have to be undefeated to become the p4p king or to make p4p top 10... JLC got many loss before he become at p4p top 10... Mayweather is undefeated cuz he ducked his comp....

17y ago

CaRnAgEViOLaToR

i like both but i'd have to say manny

17y ago

5burowz

Their resumes are comparable but Manny does have losses while Floyd does not. It's too bad Floyd was too chicken to stick around though.

17y ago

FasTHarD

Pac in 1 year, proved more than Mayweather did in 3. Green K on you.. You beat me to it...

17y ago

FasTHarD

Pacquiao easy.. When Floyd was the p4p king there's a lot of arguement about who's the really p4p in the world cuz Pac got better resume than Floyd at that time... When Pac become p4p no where near or no arguement on him and his resume...

17y ago

badboypeenoy

you can call Floyd gay all you want, but he has beat better fighters...simple as that Like who? Gatti? :D

17y ago

Lowkey

pac for me and its not even that close hes took more risks fought better comp seems that he will fight anyone put in front of him hes a much more exciting p4p no1 than floyd could ever have been and who gives a shit about how long floyd was p4p no1 tell me in those 3 years who did he fight that had a realistic shot at beating him?

17y ago

Vasyls_dad

you sound stupid Dude won 3 fights in 3 weight classes in the span of 1 calendar year. He beat better opponents, in more devasting fashion in less time. Lets take a look at Floyds 2005 Mitchell Gatti Brusseles 2006 Judah Baldomir 2007 DLH Hatton Like I said, Mannys 1 year>>>>Floyds 3.

17y ago

Horus8731

Pac in 1 year, proved more than Mayweather did in 3. you sound stupid

17y ago