Why did Hatton lose to Mayweather in your opinion

Ricky Hatton? Weebler II.

There is pretty much only one Hatton fan who is delusional enough to think that the referee was the deciding factor, and we all know who that individual is. Ricky Hatton?

I think with a better ref, Hatton could.............. lose a wide decision. :lol1: LOL I think with Floyd fighting style back in the day he would have done even better, but I also say Hatton should have went back to his original style prior to Tszyu. Cool interview that sums it up:

There is pretty much only one Hatton fan who is delusional enough to think that the referee was the deciding factor, and we all know who that individual is.

I don't care if Jesus was the ref that night; nothing could have saved Hatton. And I'm wondering what Roy thinks of God now. I think with a better ref, Hatton could.............. lose a wide decision. :lol1:

I don't care if Jesus was the ref that night; nothing could have saved Hatton. And I'm wondering what Roy thinks of God now.

Mayweather was just too good,Hatton was way out of his league in that fight. That being said Joe Cortez also played a part in not allowing Hatton(The British Fighter) to hit and hold Mayweather Jr(The Ameican Fighter).In this fight he did his Job properly which shows just how biassed he is. Especially when you consider that Hopkins(The Ameican Fighter) was allowed by the one in the same Joe Cortez to hit and hold when he fought Calzaghe(The British Fighter),the split decision outcome only happened because Hopkins was allowed to break he rules.If Cortez had done his job properly the outcome would have been a clear points win for Joe Calzaghe. That's Just wrong,Cortez showed favour to the American fighters on both these occasions.

Mayweather was just too good,Hatton was way out of his league in that fight. That being said Joe Cortez also played a part in not allowing Hatton(The British Fighter) to hit and hold Mayweather Jr(The Ameican Fighter) which shows just how biassed he is. Especially when you consider that Hopkins(The Ameican Fighter) was allowed by the one in the same Joe Cortez to hit and hold when he fought Calzaghe(The British Fighter),the split decision outcome only happened because Hopkins was allowed to break he rules.If Cortez had done his job properly the outcome would have been a clear points win for Joe Calzaghe. That's Just wrong,Cortez showed favour to the American fighters on these both occasions.

Because Floyd was on God's side

Hatton didnt stand much of a chance because Floyd is just superior in every way but Cortez snuffed out any glimmer of hope Yep...Cortez was adding propane to an already burning fire.

Hatton didnt stand much of a chance because Floyd is just superior in every way but Cortez snuffed out any glimmer of hope

I blame it on the may weather..... Even though it was in winter, damn.

He lost cause floyd is a better fighter all round... They could fight 5 times and Floyd would win all 5...

Co-sign every post in these thread.

Mayweather is the better athlete, Hatton couldn't keep up. There is also the difference in skill Mayweather disected him, Hatton couldn't go for his body shots as he would get punished for it or tied up. Also strength, Hatton thought he would be stronger than Mayweather but that wasn't the case, Mayweather can hit hard enough to damage Hatton yet he kept rushing in, he had no other way of fighting. Many things led to his defeat.

Mayweather is just the better fighter.

Same as most people i think he just wasnt good enough to match it with pbf!!!

cos he wasnt good enough

Cause he got knocked the f.uck out!

There is no need for a debate why Hatton lose to Mayweather, he got KO'ed.