THIS A SERIOUS QUESTION THAT NEED A SERIOUS ANSWER....???
1.Ok Guys, Straight up why has the only time Cotto ever won a belt, it has been for a vacant title?
First title:
~ vacant WBC International light welterweight title ~
vs. Cesar Bazan ( CONTENDER) Previous Best Win:Mauro Lucero :wtf:
Second title:
~ vacant WBO NABO light welterweight title ~
vs. Rocky Martinez ( CONTENDER) Previous Best Win:Javier Carmona:wtf:
Third title:
~ vacant WBO light welterweight title ~
vs.Kelson Pinto ( CONTENDER) Previous Best Win: Richard Savage:wtf:
Fourth Title:
~ vacant WBA welterweight title ~
vs.Carlos Quintana (CONTENDER) Previous Best Win: Joel Julio:thinking:
Where are the champions on that list?
Cotto fights all Medium RISK - Medium Reward fighters
EXCEPT ONE TIME, AND HE GOT HIS ASS BEAT..! (MARGARITO)
Their is a big difference between beating a CURRENT CHAMPION for his belt.
and beating a fellow contender for a belt.
Thats why we have words like CHAMPION and CONTENDER....
and Cotto always fights contenders for his belts...
He has never had to beat a CHAMPION for his belt.
Cotto has never had to take away something from somebody who earned it.
Cotto Flaws....Of Getting HIT alot , and wasting a lot of punches, Is a flaw you can not afford to have against The Elite Fighters And ESPECIALLY (CHAMPIONS)....., THATS WHY COTTO AVOIDS FIGHTING PRIME FIGHTERS(CHAMPIONS) FOR THEIR BELTS... AND FIGHT BULLSHIT FIGHTERS.. FOR VACANT TITLES.
Floyd and Quintana have become a VERY powerful shield. Rather then bringing Floyd to your defense why don't you just prove him wrong?
Why waste his time with people that won't listen even if their lives depended on it. They will come up with another thread with another B.S. It has to end somewhere. One can answer when they feel like. nothing here is on even terms so screw it.
At this point it's just pathetic trying to discredit Pacquiao.
Cotto was a tough, strong and tested top 2 or 3 welterweight.
Who is discrediting Pac...Just check the date of this thread !!
No one is saying Cotto is a great fighter, but he is very good and one of the best current welterweights.
very true, but his flaws IMO is what also held him back when he fought at the elite level.
Cotto just never live up to his Potential.
Plain and Simple.
Gets hit too much, and waste too many punches has been the flaws that brought about his downfall.
Cotto got his belt like everybody is saying the easy way, but he has defeat, supposely the best, Mosley, Judah and every undeafeted future of the weight class, except cheato.
Why he's not getting the respect that he deserves?
I remember when Tito was the best and never got the credit, when Hopkins defeated him, hopkins was the best of the world.
It's true, they're a lot of puertorican heaters, too bad!!!
lol.........
this is like saying he has never been Knockout..he has just been TKO...
Let me rephrase it for you. He has never been knocked down by gettin hit on his chin, he's knocked down getting hit on the temple. You're an idiot. Look at the fights and you'll see what am talking about.
Dude, you have to watch Cotto's fights, he has never been Knock down by the chin, he has been hit on his temple.
lol.........
this is like saying he has never been Knockout..he has just been TKO...
Mayweather would quit to Margarito as well.
If Cotto only had a chin... Tony wouldn't be talked about right now. On the other hand...
Mayweather will never fight Cotto, because he is scared. Doesn't want nothing of those two beasts in COtto and Tony.
So this thread.... It has been "peeleft:
Stop talking about Cotto and him going for vacants, when Floyd wouldn't even fight Tony, when he fought for belts.
Dude, you have to watch Cotto's fights, he has never been Knock down by the chin, he has been hit on his temple.