BBC calls Pavlik "typical american-level one dimensional" fighter

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!! American level? These mofo's............................................................................................................................see they're the ones talking shit. Imagine if we said something like that about Calz or Hatton in one of our newspapers. Thats f u c k ing un-called for! Nice try at stirring shit up to make UK people look bad and Abraham look better. You're a clown. Perect example: omfg... i hate those guys so much. Are they aware that Hopkins is AMERICAN???????????? Well done for stirring up hatred. 100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

Independent view based public writing. Never. Views expressed by one man do not account for an entire organisation. You should hear some of the things Buncey says. Ok, got ya. I didn't see that it was basically an editorial.

Wow, that's ignorant and harsh. Especially coming from a major media outlet like BBC. They should be more educated before saying stuff like this. Pavlik was around before Hopkins, you know.

I think you're referring to someone's post on the 606 boards, not the BBC's journalism. Here's the BBC's report: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7678475.stm No mention of the quote you referenced. Here's the article you speak of: http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A42333923 That article is just a post made by someone on their 606 boards. It'd be like me creating a thread on here hating B-Hop them someone saying that "BoxingScene hates B-Hop" based on my thread. lmao @ this gimp posting a fan forum opinion from 606

omfg... i hate those guys so much. Are they aware that Hopkins is AMERICAN???????????? Read the following posts, it's a forum article like one of us posting a review on the fight.

omfg... i hate those guys so much. Are they aware that Hopkins is AMERICAN????????????

The Great white hoax exposed. by Christopher_Wasp (U10452061) 19 October 2008 Hate to say I told you so folks, but Kelly Pavlik has been exposed as the typical american-level one dimensional come forwards banger a few of the more knowledgeable fans (myself included) have been calling him as all along. He was comprehensively taught a boxing lesson by a shell of a hopkins who Joe Calzaghe caused to crawl around the apron yelping like a lame old seadog. The clamour for the ridiculous Pavlik Calzaghe bout will now go away and Calzaghe can retire to the Hall of fame without the uninformed and uninitiated using the great white hoax as a reason to delay Joes well deserved retirement to the pantheon. word of advice from a concerned boxing fan for KP - stick to middleweight where your power looks half impressive, avoid King Arthur Abraham AT ALL COSTS. Hard to say where you go from here perhaps back to beating up on hicksville tomato cans like you have done for the rest of your career. Question is, would a hopkins pre calzaghe-battering have knocked KP out cold? thoughts folks http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A42333923 That's a user created article....

BBC run this shit!

It says BBC Article Home, and I was sssssoooooo pissed off at the "american-level" part I just lost it. I dont WTF a 606 BS is and shit man. I said sorry, I mis-read or misunderstood it and its my fault, my mistake. Mucho Tak It Ease! LOL, tbh though the BBC's journalism is sometimes that bad, it's an easy mistake to make!

It says BBC Article Home, and I was sssssoooooo pissed off at the "american-level" part I just lost it. I dont WTF a 606 BS is and shit man. I said sorry, I mis-read or misunderstood it and its my fault, my mistake. Mucho Tak It Ease! I pardon you. Just forgive me when I cite a boxing forums "OMG mARGE BEat wlad ko1" thread as a story from the New York times lol.

This was written in a fan forum by a stupid fanboy. This was not written by a journalist working for the beeb. Honestly, can't you tell the difference between an article and a forum? It says BBC Article Home, and I was sssssoooooo pissed off at the "american-level" part I just lost it. I dont WTF a 606 BS is and shit man. I said sorry, I mis-read or misunderstood it and its my fault, my mistake. Mucho Tak It Ease!

This was written in a fan forum by a stupid fanboy. This was not written by a journalist working for the beeb. Honestly, can't you tell the difference between an article and a forum?

Maybe a link? http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A42333923

It's just a typical forum poster like everyone else, got nothing to do with the BBC. Do you think the BBC would have an article titled, "The Great white hoax exposed"?

It's 606, where members of the public can write articles on the website.

I think you're referring to someone's post on the 606 boards, not the BBC's journalism. OOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH F U C K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your right, f u c k I just saw BBC news and I thought....................oh shit my bad guys. My fault

Independent view based public writing. Never. Views expressed by one man do not account for an entire organisation. You should hear some of the things Buncey says.

Maybe a link?

The Great white hoax exposed. by Christopher_Wasp (U10452061) 19 October 2008 Hate to say I told you so folks, but Kelly Pavlik has been exposed as the typical american-level one dimensional come forwards banger a few of the more knowledgeable fans (myself included) have been calling him as all along. He was comprehensively taught a boxing lesson by a shell of a hopkins who Joe Calzaghe caused to crawl around the apron yelping like a lame old seadog. The clamour for the ridiculous Pavlik Calzaghe bout will now go away and Calzaghe can retire to the Hall of fame without the uninformed and uninitiated using the great white hoax as a reason to delay Joes well deserved retirement to the pantheon. word of advice from a concerned boxing fan for KP - stick to middleweight where your power looks half impressive, avoid King Arthur Abraham AT ALL COSTS. Hard to say where you go from here perhaps back to beating up on hicksville tomato cans like you have done for the rest of your career. Question is, would a hopkins pre calzaghe-battering have knocked KP out cold? thoughts folks http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A42333923

I think you're referring to someone's post on the 606 boards, not the BBC's journalism. Here's the BBC's report: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7678475.stm No mention of the quote you referenced. Here's the article you speak of: http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A42333923 That article is just a post made by someone on their 606 boards. It'd be like me creating a thread on here hating B-Hop them someone saying that "BoxingScene hates B-Hop" based on my thread.