Joe beats Lacy and all the revisionist yank wankers say that he was overarrated. Hopkins domintates Pavlik and all the yanks open their mouths wide for his cock.
Clazaghe would have schooled Pavlik given the chance and beat Hopkins fair and square yet you are not men enough to admit it cause you come from a culture that doesn't know how to admit when it's wrong.
Unintelligent, fickle, arrogant idiots..........
Thats exactly what it is...
Although i do believe Joe would beat Pav 2..
Yes at first I thought Pavlik would do well at light heavy, but now he looks confused and unable to deal with speed. I doubt he has as much stopping power at light heavy, but who knows.
Bad style match up, Calzaghe had the style to beat Hopkins, and Hopkins had the style to beat Pavlik. I think Pavlik should stay at 160, he looked terrible against Hopkins.
Thats exactly what it is...
Although i do believe Joe would beat Pav 2..
I'm not comparing the fighters, i'm comparing the attitudes.......... and it's obvious that all the Hopkins fans are simply saying that he beat Clazaghe and Pavlik and refusing to give Joe any credit.
It's not only americans that are all time greats you know.........
Hopkins tired out later in that fight. At round 6 Hopkins looked like he wanted to take a nap instead of fighting Calzaghe anymore. Joe's too much workrate for Hopkins.
Both Joe Calzaghe and Bernard Hopkins are world class champions and both don't get the respect they deserve in this sport. Some jackass on justin tv told me that hopkins and calzaghe fought just bums there entire career... If that was so true, then why do they keep winning against the elites?
Bad style match up, Calzaghe had the style to beat Hopkins, and Hopkins had the style to beat Pavlik. I think Pavlik should stay at 160, he looked terrible against Hopkins.
I'm not comparing the fighters, i'm comparing the attitudes.......... and it's obvious that all the Hopkins fans are simply saying that he beat Clazaghe and Pavlik and refusing to give Joe any credit.
It's not only americans that are all time greats you know.........
when i wast watching the fight it reminded me alot of the lacy and calzaghe fight.
interesting though ppl turned around after the lacey fight and said that lacey was just over rated, they seemed real reluctant to give him his credit.
Hopkins schools pavlik and like zaghe its a near shut out with him taking every round, yet ppl turn around and say that its because Bernards so damn good, sounds like double standards to me. It would have been interesting to see what would have been said if it was calzaghe/abraham who had exposed pavlik.
there was an interesting comment by abraham who before hand said that he wanted to be the first to expose Pavlik.
Also look at the fighters predictions of who will win and the likes of sugar shane, DLH, and a few other big names favoured Hopkins and favoured him heavily. They know the buisness and the sport they know that sometimes a fighter comes along who is not really all that and his basically a hype job.
________
Buy herbalaire vaporizer
Pavlik has alot better stable then Lacy, and well Lacy was beat by a women whos fast, and Pav by a man who can fight
That so called same woman you mentioned sure made Hopkins look dumb at times and even gassed Hopkins out... Wow, thats one tough woman... LOL
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/04_03/calzagheR2004_468x503.jpg
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll67/rongonzo/calzaghe-hopkins0405.jpg