Marquez would easily dispose of Nate Campbell

Campbell will always be remembered for one thing, and it's this: Welcome to 2008. Glad you could join us.

Easily dispose? LOL. Fight with Casa is almost even until the KO.

Watch again, it's pretty damn funny He's a cocky mother fucker and that's what he gets.

Campbell will always be remembered for one thing, and it's this: Loser And Guzman will always be remembered for one thing too. lol idiot.

Campbell will always be remembered for one thing, and it's this: Loser

you have to keep in mind he is the physically smaller of the two, and is probably just as high if not higher mileage than Campbell. Id keep my money in my pocket on this one. Actually, JMM has quite a few more miles on him than Nate.... Year turned pro - JMM 1993 - Nate 2000 Fights - JMM 53 - Nate 38 Rounds fought - JMM 390 - Nate 220 Age - JMM 35 - Nate 36

And you cant argue your point that JMM beats Nate. Based on what? On being on the floor 4 times against Pac? On stopping an old Casa in 11 that Nate would have put away in 5 or 6? A green Nate fought a prime casa 5 years ago, in a fight alot of folks thought Nate won. And JMM fights the washed up version of casa, and 2 judges have it even after 10 rounds. You may have an OPINION that JMM beats Nate, but that doesnt make it FACT. I'm pretty sure if I gave a shit enough to look, you probably had a post awhile back that said "Diaz will easily beat Nate". So what? lol. How about they just fight, and then we'll see who wins? My thoughts exactly.

You guys can't argue against my statement that JMM would beat Fake Campbell so you attack the "easily" part of the thread topic. Children. What you posted are subjective and biased opinions. Marquez beating Campbell is not a fact. So don't act like you schooled anybody here. Until Marquez actually does it, you don't have shit in terms of facts. I'm sure you also picked Diaz over Campbell "easily". How did that pick turn out?

I dont think thats giving Campbell enough respect. I know the guy has had some tough spots in his career, but he really redeemed a lot of that against Juan Diaz. After that fight I think we can all agree that when Nate has his head together, and actually shows up to fight, hes a very bad man. JMM is also a legit BMF, but you have to keep in mind he is the physically smaller of the two, and is probably just as high if not higher mileage than Campbell. Id keep my money in my pocket on this one.

You guys can't argue against my statement that JMM would beat Fake Campbell so you attack the "easily" part of the thread topic. Children. And you cant argue your point that JMM beats Nate. Based on what? On being on the floor 4 times against Pac? On stopping an old Casa in 11 that Nate would have put away in 5 or 6? A green Nate fought a prime casa 5 years ago, in a fight alot of folks thought Nate won. And JMM fights the washed up version of casa, and 2 judges have it even after 10 rounds. You may have an OPINION that JMM beats Nate, but that doesnt make it FACT. I'm pretty sure if I gave a shit enough to look, you probably had a post awhile back that said "Diaz will easily beat Nate". So what? lol. How about they just fight, and then we'll see who wins?

You guys can't argue against my statement that JMM would beat Fake Campbell so you attack the "easily" part of the thread topic. Children. Good lord are you so obtuse? I actually think Marquez would win, but he wouldn't win easily. You post something for people to discuss and now you are running away from it? It sure sounds like you are the dimwitted child.

Hey genius you are the one who posted and named the title of this thread "Marquez would easily dispose of Nate Campbell". Idiot. You guys can't argue against my statement that JMM would beat Fake Campbell so you attack the "easily" part of the thread topic. Children.

Another Triangle Theory? You're hate for Nate is just too much.. I'd rather pretend not being a Diaz or JMM fan so it wont be bias. L0l yes, triangle theories do not have any validity to them. they have been proven wrong time and time again. i would love to see marquez vs. campbell though!! what a great fight that would be. weather you like nate o not, he will fight anybody and i'm sure he will fight marquez when the time is right.

Nate fights mandatory's. That pretty much ends there. So first to become mandatory(right now, Diaz is ahead), will get a shot at campbell. I see Diaz, jmm (and maybe Breidis''khan-killer''Prescott maybe?) beating Nate. Same here.

Nate fights mandatory's. That pretty much ends there. So first to become mandatory(right now, Diaz is ahead), will get a shot at campbell. I see Diaz, jmm (and maybe Breidis''khan-killer''Prescott maybe?) beating Nate.

You guys keep focusing on "it won't be easy" or the "triangle theory" but what you all are avoiding is the fact that Juan Manuel Marquez would defeat Nate Campbell. You all are trying to create arguments while avoiding the main topic of the thread: JMM beats Campbell. Now argue that. Hey genius you are the one who posted and named the title of this thread "Marquez would easily dispose of Nate Campbell". Idiot.

Diaz had a bad night thats all he couldnt get off his punches .

Campbell didn't get lucky against Diaz. I fail to see how standing in the pocket and beating your opponent at his own game is getting lucky. Thank you for pointing out how stupid that logic is.

i think JMM beats campbell quite easily. its not that im a campbell hater or a JMM nuthugger or anything of the sort. I think the reality is that campbell got lucky against Juan Diaz and now all of the sudden he gets brought into question when talking about megafights and i dont think he's at that level. i would even say diaz beats him in a rematch. and lets face it JMM is one of, if not arguably THEE best fighter at lightweight. Campbell didn't get lucky against Diaz. I fail to see how standing in the pocket and beating your opponent at his own game is getting lucky.

I dont care who wins but I want to watch it. Both guys are tough and capable of winning.