KO vs TKO

I reckon that the TKO can seriously misrepresent a fighters power. I'm not saying a boxer should be made to continue if hes wobbly or taking a massive beatdown, and I'm not suggesting that a TKO should not be considered a KO. I just look at fighters like Khan who have "knocked out" 14 of 19 opponents, yet in reality each of those 14 have beat the count. Breidis Prescott, on the contrary, has literally hurt 14 guys enough that they were unable to stand up given 10 seconds. :boxing: Joe Calzaghe is another abuser of the TKO victory, and when you think about his style, (fast hands and a high workrate) I can see why many refs pull his opponents away from the blizzard of punches. Personally I don't think Joe is much of a puncher though, despite having 32 knockouts of 45, only 2 of those were truly blown from their senses (in the first round admitedly). A TKO seems to compliment power but if your popping a guys head in every direction, and he keeps standing, only to be pulled by the referee, maybe the power aint there. Having read the post over, it does seem slightly incoherent but fuck it, its my first thread. Anyone see were im coming from?:bigeyes: